Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 May 1;101(1):144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.048. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, dosimetric benefits, delivery efficiency, and patient comfort in the clinical implementation of 4π radiation therapy.
Eleven patients with recurrent high-grade glioma were recruited for the trial. 4π plans integrating beam orientation and fluence-map optimization were created using an in-house column-generation algorithm. The collision-free beam solution space throughout the 4π steradian was determined using a computer-aided-design model of the Varian TrueBeam system and a human subject. Twenty beams were optimized for each case and imported into Eclipse for intensity modulated radiation therapy planning. Beam orientations with neighboring couch kicks were merged for increased delivery efficiency, generating plans with an average of 16 beam orientations. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with 3-4 arcs were also generated for each case, and the plan achieving superior dosimetric quality was selected for treatment. Patient comfort was surveyed after every fraction. Multiple 2-dimensional X-ray images were obtained to measure intrafractional motion.
Of 11 patients, 9 were treated with 4π. Mean and maximum organ at risk doses were equal or significantly lower (P < .05) with 4π than with VMAT. Particularly substantial dose reduction of 2.92 Gy in the average accumulated brainstem maximum dose enabled treatments that would otherwise not satisfy safe dose constraints with VMAT. One patient was not treated because neither plan met the dosimetric criteria. The other was treated with VMAT owing to comparable dosimetry resulting from a planning target volume located in a separate co-plane superior to organs at risk. Treatments were well tolerated, with an average patient comfort score of 8.6/10. Intrafractional motion was <1.5 mm for all delivered fractions, and the average delivery time was 34.1 minutes.
The feasibility, safety, dosimetric benefits, delivery efficiency, and patient comfort of 4π radiation therapy have been clinically demonstrated with a prospective clinical trial. The results elucidate the potential and challenges of wider clinical implementations.
评估 4π 放射治疗临床实施的可行性、安全性、剂量学优势、治疗效率和患者舒适度。
该试验招募了 11 名复发性高级别脑胶质瘤患者。使用内部列生成算法为每位患者创建了整合射束方向和通量图优化的 4π 计划。通过瓦里安 TrueBeam 系统和人体的计算机辅助设计模型确定了整个 4π 立体角内无碰撞射束解决方案空间。为每个病例优化了 20 个射束,并将其导入 Eclipse 进行强度调制放射治疗计划。为了提高治疗效率,将具有相邻治疗床踢动的射束方向合并,生成的计划平均有 16 个射束方向。为每个病例还生成了 3-4 个弧的容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划,并选择具有更好剂量学质量的计划进行治疗。每次分割治疗后都对患者舒适度进行了调查。获取多个二维 X 射线图像以测量分次内运动。
11 名患者中有 9 名接受了 4π 治疗。与 VMAT 相比,4π 的平均和最大危及器官剂量相等或显著降低(P<.05)。特别是脑干最大剂量的平均累积值降低了 2.92Gy,使得原本不符合 VMAT 安全剂量限制的治疗方案得以实施。有 1 名患者因两种方案均不符合剂量学标准而未接受治疗,另 1 名患者因计划靶区位于与危及器官分开的同一平面而接受了 VMAT 治疗,因为两种方案的剂量学结果相当。治疗耐受性良好,平均患者舒适度评分为 8.6/10。所有治疗的分次内运动均<1.5mm,平均治疗时间为 34.1 分钟。
前瞻性临床试验已经证明了 4π 放射治疗的可行性、安全性、剂量学优势、治疗效率和患者舒适度。结果阐明了更广泛临床应用的潜力和挑战。