McGregor Margaret J, Cox Michelle B, Slater Jay M, Poss Jeff, McGrail Kimberlyn M, Ronald Lisa A, Sloan John, Schulzer Michael
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, 713-828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
UBC Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, Vancouver, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 5;18(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3040-y.
As individuals age, they are more likely to experience increasing frailty and more frequent use of hospital services. First, we explored whether initiating home-based primary care in a frail homebound cohort, influenced hospital use. Second, we explored whether initiating regular home care support for personal care with usual primary care, in a second somewhat less frail cohort, influenced hospital use.
This was a before-after retrospective cohort study of two frail populations in Vancouver, Canada using administrative data to assess the influence of two different services started in two different cohorts over the same time period. The participants were 246 recipients of integrated home-based primary care and 492 recipients of home care followed between July 1st, 2008 and June 30th, 2013 before and after starting their respective services. Individuals in each group were linked to their hospital emergency department visit and discharge abstract records. The main outcome measures were mean emergency department visit and hospital admission rates per 1000 patient days for 21 months before versus the period after receipt of services, and the adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) on these outcomes post receipt of service.
Before versus after starting integrated home-based primary care, emergency department visit rates per 1000 patient days (95% confidence intervals) were 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) versus 3.7 (3.3, 4.1), and hospital admissions rates were 2.3 (2.1, 2.5) versus 2.2 (1.9, 2.5). Before versus after starting home care, emergency department visit rates per 1000 patient days (95% confidence intervals) were 3.0 (2.8, 3.2) versus 4.0 (3.7, 4.3) visits and hospital admissions rates were 1.3 (1.2, 1.4) versus 1.9 (1.7, 2.1). Home-based primary care IRRs were 0.91 (0.72, 1.15) and 0.99 (0.76, 1.27) and home care IRRs were 1.34 (1.15, 1.56) and 1.46 (1.22, 1.74) for emergency department visits and hospital admissions respectively.
After enrollment in integrated home-based primary care, emergency department visit and hospital admission rates stabilized. After starting home care with usual primary care, emergency department visit and hospital admission rates continued to rise.
随着个体年龄增长,他们更有可能变得日益虚弱,且更频繁地使用医院服务。首先,我们探讨了在居家虚弱人群中启动家庭初级保健是否会影响医院服务的使用。其次,我们探讨了在第二个相对不那么虚弱的人群中,在常规初级保健基础上启动定期家庭护理支持以提供个人护理,是否会影响医院服务的使用。
这是一项针对加拿大温哥华两个虚弱人群的前后回顾性队列研究,使用行政数据评估在同一时期在两个不同队列中启动的两种不同服务的影响。参与者为246名接受综合家庭初级保健的患者和492名接受家庭护理的患者,在2008年7月1日至2013年6月30日期间,分别在开始各自服务之前和之后进行随访。每组个体均与他们的医院急诊科就诊和出院摘要记录相关联。主要结局指标为接受服务前21个月与接受服务后每1000患者日的平均急诊科就诊率和住院率,以及接受服务后这些结局的调整发病率比(IRR)。
在开始综合家庭初级保健之前和之后,每1000患者日的急诊科就诊率(95%置信区间)分别为4.1(3.8,4.4)和3.7(3.3,4.1),住院率分别为2.3(2.1,2.5)和2.2(1.9,2.5)。在开始家庭护理之前和之后,每1000患者日的急诊科就诊率(95%置信区间)分别为3.0(2.8,3.2)和4.0(3.7,4.3),住院率分别为1.3(1.2,1.4)和1.9(1.7,2.1)。家庭初级保健的急诊科就诊和住院的IRR分别为0.91(0.72,1.15)和0.99(0.76,1.27),家庭护理的急诊科就诊和住院的IRR分别为1.34(1.15,1.56)和1.46(1.22,1.74)。
在加入综合家庭初级保健后,急诊科就诊率和住院率趋于稳定。在开始常规初级保健的家庭护理后,急诊科就诊率和住院率持续上升。