Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance.
作者信息
Marín-Franch Iván
机构信息
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
出版信息
J Optom. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):67-68. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.001.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Publication bias and the chase for statistical significance.发表偏倚与对统计学显著性的追求。
J Optom. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):67-68. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2018.03.001.
2
Publication bias as a function of study characteristics.发表偏倚的研究特征函数。
Psychol Methods. 2015 Sep;20(3):310-30. doi: 10.1037/met0000046.
3
The bias busters.偏见破除者。
BMJ. 2014 Jul 23;349:g4748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4748.
4
A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.一种减轻发表偏倚的贝叶斯方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):74-86. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0868-6.
5
Statistical and clinical interpretation of research results.研究结果的统计学与临床解读。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;97(2):165-70. doi: 10.7547/0970165.
6
White hat bias: a threat to the integrity of scientific reporting.白帽偏见：对科学报告完整性的一种威胁。
Acta Paediatr. 2010 Nov;99(11):1615-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02006.x.
7
Rethinking reanalysis.重新思考再分析。
JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2499-500. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281337.
8
Editorial: Sparse-data Bias-What the Savvy Reader Needs to Know.社论：稀疏数据偏差——精明读者需要了解的内容。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Apr;476(4):657-659. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000228.
9
The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.统计分析计划在观察性研究中的价值：从一开始就定义高质量研究。
JAMA. 2012 Aug 22;308(8):773-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.9502.
10
[Reverberations of the past or the pitfalls of statistical and data manipulation].[过去的余波还是统计与数据操纵的陷阱]
Rev Med Suisse. 2011 Jun 15;7(299):1332-3.
引用本文的文献
1
The unmet promise of trustworthy AI in healthcare: why we fail at clinical translation.医疗保健领域中值得信赖的人工智能尚未实现的承诺：我们在临床转化中失败的原因。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Apr 18;6:1279629. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1279629. eCollection 2024.
2
Publication delays and associated factors in ophthalmology journals.眼科期刊的发表延迟及其相关因素。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 3;10:e14331. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14331. eCollection 2022.
3
A decentralized framework for cultivating research lifecycle transparency.去中心化的研究生命周期透明度培养框架。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0241496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241496. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Scientific information overload in vision: What is behind?视觉领域的科学信息过载：背后的原因是什么？
J Optom. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.12.001.
2
Science, pseudoscience, evidence-based practice and post truth.科学、伪科学、循证实践与后真相
J Optom. 2017 Oct-Dec;10(4):203-204. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2017.08.001.
3
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility.1500名科学家揭开了可重复性的盖子。
Nature. 2016 May 26;533(7604):452-4. doi: 10.1038/533452a.
4
The Nine Circles of Scientific Hell.科学地狱的九层轮回。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):643-4. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459519. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
5
Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology.眼科领域的阳性结果偏倚与影响因子
Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(8):858-61. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2014.957777. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network.引用失真如何产生无根据的权威性：对一个引用网络的分析
BMJ. 2009 Jul 20;339:b2680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2680.
7
Why most published research findings are false.为何大多数已发表的研究结果是错误的。
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. Epub 2005 Aug 30.
8
Publication bias in clinical research.临床研究中的发表偏倚。
Lancet. 1991 Apr 13;337(8746):867-72. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-y.
Zotero 插件