Suppr超能文献

血管外科学会的伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类独立预测糖尿病足溃疡的伤口愈合。

The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification independently predicts wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers.

机构信息

Diabetic Foot and Wound Service, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Md.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.079. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have reported correlation between the Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system and wound healing time on unadjusted analyses. However, in the only multivariable analysis to date, WIfI stage was not predictive of wound healing. Our aim was to examine the association between WIfI classification and wound healing after risk adjustment in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated in a multidisciplinary setting.

METHODS

All patients presenting to our multidisciplinary DFU clinic from June 2012 to July 2017 were enrolled in a prospective database. A Cox proportional hazards model accounting for patients' sociodemographics, comorbidities, medication profiles, and wound characteristics was used to assess the association between WIfI classification and likelihood of wound healing at 1 year.

RESULTS

There were 310 DFU patients enrolled (mean age, 59.0 ± 0.7 years; 60.3% male; 60.0% black) with 709 wounds, including 32.4% WIfI stage 1, 19.9% stage 2, 25.2% stage 3, and 22.4% stage 4. Mean wound healing time increased with increasing WIfI stage (stage 1, 96.9 ± 8.3 days; stage 4, 195.1 ± 10.6 days; P < .001). Likelihood of wound healing at 1 year was 94.1% ± 2.0% for stage 1 wounds vs 67.4% ± 4.4% for stage 4 (P < .001). After risk adjustment, increasing WIfI stage was independently associated with poor wound healing (stage 4 vs stage 1: hazard ratio, [HR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.59). Peripheral artery disease (HR, 0.73), increasing wound area (HR, 0.99 per square centimeter), and longer time from wound onset to first assessment (HR, 0.97 per month) also decreased the likelihood of wound healing, whereas use of clopidogrel was protective (HR, 1.39; all, P ≤ .04). The top three predictors of poor wound healing were WIfI stage 4 (z score, -5.40), increasing wound area (z score, -3.14), and WIfI stage 3 (z score, -3.11), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with DFU, the WIfI classification system predicts wound healing at 1 year in both crude and risk-adjusted analyses. This is the first study to validate the WIfI score as an independent predictor of wound healing using multivariable analysis.

摘要

目的

先前的研究报告称,伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类系统与未经调整分析的伤口愈合时间之间存在相关性。然而,在迄今为止唯一的多变量分析中,WIfI 分期对伤口愈合并无预测作用。我们的目的是在多学科环境中治疗糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者的情况下,在风险调整后,检查 WIfI 分类与伤口愈合之间的关联。

方法

2012 年 6 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,所有到我们多学科 DFU 诊所就诊的患者均被纳入前瞻性数据库。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,对患者的社会人口统计学、合并症、药物治疗概况和伤口特征进行风险调整,以评估 WIfI 分类与 1 年时伤口愈合的可能性之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 310 例 DFU 患者(平均年龄 59.0±0.7 岁;60.3%为男性;60.0%为黑人),共有 709 处伤口,其中 32.4%为 WIfI 分期 1 期,19.9%为分期 2 期,25.2%为分期 3 期,22.4%为分期 4 期。随着 WIfI 分期的增加,伤口愈合时间也随之增加(分期 1 期为 96.9±8.3 天;分期 4 期为 195.1±10.6 天;P<.001)。1 年时伤口愈合的可能性为:分期 1 期为 94.1%±2.0%,分期 4 期为 67.4%±4.4%(P<.001)。在风险调整后,WIfI 分期的增加与伤口愈合不良独立相关(分期 4 期与分期 1 期相比:风险比[HR]0.44;95%置信区间[CI]0.33-0.59)。外周动脉疾病(HR 0.73)、伤口面积增加(HR 每平方厘米增加 0.99)和从伤口发病到首次评估的时间延长(HR 每月增加 0.97)也降低了伤口愈合的可能性,而使用氯吡格雷则具有保护作用(HR 1.39;所有 P≤.04)。伤口愈合不良的前三大预测因素分别为 WIfI 分期 4 期(z 评分,-5.40)、伤口面积增加(z 评分,-3.14)和 WIfI 分期 3 期(z 评分,-3.11)。

结论

在 DFU 患者中,WIfI 分类系统在未调整和风险调整分析中均预测了 1 年时的伤口愈合情况。这是第一项使用多变量分析验证 WIfI 评分作为伤口愈合独立预测因子的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验