• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用价格作为政策工具来利用私营医疗部门:南非的经验教训。

Harnessing the private health sector by using prices as a policy instrument: Lessons learned from South Africa.

机构信息

World Health Organization Centre for Health Development, 1-5-1 Wakinohama-Kaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 651-0073, Japan.

Independent consultant.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):558-564. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.018
PMID:29622381
Abstract

Governments frequently draw upon the private health care sector to promote sustainability, optimal use of resources, and increased choice. In doing so, policy-makers face the challenge of harnessing resources while grappling with the market failures and equity concerns associated with private financing of health care. The growth of the private health sector in South Africa has fundamentally changed the structure of health care delivery. A mutually reinforcing ecosystem of private health insurers, private hospitals and specialists has grown to account for almost half of the country's spending on health care, despite only serving 16% of the population with the capacity to pay. Following years of consolidation among private hospital groups and insurance schemes, and after successive failures at establishing credible price benchmarks, South Africa's private hospitals charge prices comparable with countries that are considerably richer. This compromises the affordability of a broad-based expansion in health care for the population. The South African example demonstrates that prices can be part of a structure that perpetuates inequalities in access to health care resources. The lesson for other countries is the importance of norms and institutions that uphold price schedules in high-income countries. Efforts to compromise or liberalize price setting should be undertaken with a healthy degree of caution.

摘要

政府经常借助私营医疗保健部门来促进可持续性、资源的最佳利用和更多的选择。在这样做的过程中,政策制定者面临着在利用资源的同时应对与医疗保健私营融资相关的市场失灵和公平性问题的挑战。南非私营医疗保健部门的增长从根本上改变了医疗服务提供的结构。私营医疗保险商、私营医院和专科医生之间的相互促进的生态系统已经发展起来,占该国医疗保健支出的近一半,尽管只为有支付能力的 16%的人口提供服务。在私营医院集团和保险计划多年的整合之后,以及在连续未能建立可信的价格基准之后,南非的私营医院收取的价格与那些富裕得多的国家相当。这降低了为人口提供广泛的医疗保健的可负担性。南非的例子表明,价格可以成为一种结构的一部分,这种结构会使获得医疗资源的机会不平等永久化。其他国家的教训是,坚持高收入国家价格表的规范和制度的重要性。在做出妥协或放宽价格设定的努力时,应该保持适度的谨慎。

相似文献

1
Harnessing the private health sector by using prices as a policy instrument: Lessons learned from South Africa.利用价格作为政策工具来利用私营医疗部门:南非的经验教训。
Health Policy. 2018 May;122(5):558-564. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
2
The role of insurance in the achievement of universal coverage within a developing country context: South Africa as a case study.发展中国家实现全民覆盖背景下的保险作用:以南非为例。
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S5. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
3
Social health insurance contributes to universal coverage in South Africa, but generates inequities: survey among members of a government employee insurance scheme.社会健康保险有助于南非实现全民覆盖,但也造成了不平等:对政府雇员保险计划成员的调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jan 4;17(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0710-z.
4
Perceptions of and support for national health insurance in South Africa's public and private healthcare sectors.南非公共和私营医疗部门对国家医疗保险的认知与支持
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Aug 16;30:277. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.30.277.14147. eCollection 2018.
5
Private sector health reform in South Africa.南非的私营部门医疗改革。
Health Econ. 1998 Jun;7(4):281-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199806)7:4<281::aid-hec355>3.0.co;2-z.
6
Traditional Medicare Versus Private Insurance: How Spending, Volume, And Price Change At Age Sixty-Five.传统医疗保险与私人保险:65岁时支出、服务量及价格如何变化
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):864-72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1195.
7
It's Still The Prices, Stupid: Why The US Spends So Much On Health Care, And A Tribute To Uwe Reinhardt.还是价格问题:美国医疗保健支出为何如此之高——纪念乌韦·赖因哈特。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):87-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05144.
8
Testing times: trends in availability, price, and market share of malaria diagnostics in the public and private healthcare sector across eight sub-Saharan African countries from 2009 to 2015.测试时期:2009年至2015年撒哈拉以南非洲八个国家公共和私营医疗部门疟疾诊断检测的可及性、价格及市场份额趋势
Malar J. 2017 May 19;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1829-5.
9
Regulating the for-profit private health sector: lessons from East and Southern Africa.规范营利性私营医疗部门:来自东非和南部非洲的经验教训。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30 Suppl 1:i93-102. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu111.
10
Private sector participation in delivering tertiary health care: a dichotomy of access and affordability across two Indian states.私营部门参与提供三级医疗保健服务:印度两个邦在可及性和可负担性方面的二元分化。
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Mar;30 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-31. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu061.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Shifting in Lung Cancer Inpatient Care Under Diagnosis-Intervention Packet Reform: A Pilot Study in China.诊断-干预包改革下肺癌住院治疗中的成本转移:中国的一项试点研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 5;18:759-773. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S498634. eCollection 2025.
2
How significant is cost-shifting behavior under the diagnosis intervention packet payment reform? Evidence from the coronary heart disease market.在诊断干预打包付费改革下,成本转移行为的影响程度如何?来自冠心病市场的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 20;12:1431991. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1431991. eCollection 2024.
3
Possible Changes and Trends in Non-COVID-19 Vaccine-Prescribing Patterns before and during COVID-19 Pandemic.
2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间非2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种模式可能出现的变化及趋势
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 27;12(6):582. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12060582.
4
The role of private healthcare sector actors in health service delivery and financing policy processes in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家私立医疗保健部门行为体在卫生服务提供及融资政策进程中的作用:一项范围界定综述
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 5;8(Suppl 5):e013408. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013408.
5
Models using private general practitioners to provide caesarean deliveries at five South African district public hospitals: insights for public-private contracting for obstetric care in rural areas.模型利用私人全科医生在南非五个地区公立医院提供剖宫产服务:农村地区产科保健公私合同的见解。
Glob Health Action. 2023 Dec 31;16(1):2241811. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2241811.
6
Hyperglycemia First Detected in Pregnancy in South Africa: Facts, Gaps, and Opportunities.南非孕期首次检测出血糖过高:事实、差距与机遇
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022 May 24;3:895743. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.895743. eCollection 2022.
7
Understanding Differences in Health Care Spending: A Comparative Study of Prices and Volumes Across OECD Countries.理解医疗保健支出的差异:经合组织国家价格与数量的比较研究
Health Serv Insights. 2022 Jun 23;15:11786329221109755. doi: 10.1177/11786329221109755. eCollection 2022.
8
The Association of Market Mix of Hospital Ownership With Medical Disputes: Evidence From China.医院所有权的市场组合与医疗纠纷的关联:来自中国的证据。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020971403. doi: 10.1177/0046958020971403.
9
Other considerations than: how much will universal health coverage cost?除了考虑:全民健康覆盖需要花费多少?
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Feb 1;98(2):95-99. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.238915. Epub 2019 Nov 22.