• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边缘捕食:遭遇效应还是混淆效应能解释对猎物群体边缘的定向选择?

Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?

作者信息

Duffield Callum, Ioannou Christos C

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.

出版信息

Behav Ecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;28(5):1283-1292. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx090. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1093/beheco/arx090
PMID:29622928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5873256/
Abstract

Marginal predation, also known as the edge effect, occurs when aggregations of prey are preferentially targeted on their periphery by predators and has long been established in many taxa. Two main processes have been used to explain this phenomenon, the confusion effect and the encounter rate between predators and prey group edges. However, it is unknown at what size a prey group needs to be before marginal predation is detectable and to what extent each mechanism drives the effect. We conducted 2 experiments using groups of virtual prey being preyed upon by 3-spined sticklebacks () to address these questions. In Experiment 1, we show that group sizes do not need to be large for marginal predation to occur, with this being detectable in groups of 16 or more. In Experiment 2, we find that encounter rate is a more likely explanation for marginal predation than the confusion effect in this system. We find that while confusion does affect predatory behaviors (whether or not predators make an attack), it does not affect marginal predation. Our results suggest that marginal predation is a more common phenomenon than originally thought as it also applies to relatively small groups. Similarly, as marginal predation does not need the confusion effect to occur, it may occur in a wider range of predator-prey species pairings, for example those where the predators search for prey using nonvisual sensory modalities.

摘要

边缘捕食,也称为边缘效应,是指猎物聚集时,其边缘优先被捕食者盯上,这种现象在许多生物分类群中早已存在。有两个主要过程被用来解释这一现象,即混淆效应以及捕食者与猎物群体边缘的相遇率。然而,尚不清楚猎物群体需要多大规模才能检测到边缘捕食,以及每种机制在多大程度上驱动了这种效应。我们进行了两项实验,用虚拟猎物群体被三刺鱼捕食来解决这些问题。在实验1中,我们表明,边缘捕食的发生并不需要很大的群体规模,16个或更多个体的群体就能检测到这种现象。在实验2中,我们发现,在这个系统中,相遇率比混淆效应更有可能是边缘捕食的原因。我们发现,虽然混淆确实会影响捕食行为(捕食者是否发动攻击),但它并不影响边缘捕食。我们的结果表明,边缘捕食是一种比原先认为的更为普遍的现象,因为它也适用于相对较小的群体。同样,由于边缘捕食的发生不需要混淆效应,它可能发生在更广泛的捕食者 - 猎物物种配对中,例如捕食者使用非视觉感官模式搜索猎物的情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/1f7438a0da30/arx09007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/480e3c3cb160/arx09001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/922a3dadd2fe/arx09002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/2f699cb10874/arx09003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/7f6208b08f2a/arx09004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/80886fd2d266/arx09005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/994fd15dac98/arx09006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/1f7438a0da30/arx09007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/480e3c3cb160/arx09001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/922a3dadd2fe/arx09002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/2f699cb10874/arx09003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/7f6208b08f2a/arx09004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/80886fd2d266/arx09005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/994fd15dac98/arx09006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5803/5873256/1f7438a0da30/arx09007.jpg

相似文献

1
Marginal predation: do encounter or confusion effects explain the targeting of prey group edges?边缘捕食:遭遇效应还是混淆效应能解释对猎物群体边缘的定向选择?
Behav Ecol. 2017 Sep-Oct;28(5):1283-1292. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arx090. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
2
Virtual prey with Lévy motion are preferentially attacked by predatory fish.具有 Lévy 运动的虚拟猎物更容易受到掠食性鱼类的攻击。
Behav Ecol. 2023 May 18;34(4):695-699. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad039. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
3
The hunter and the hunted-A 3D analysis of predator-prey interactions between three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and larvae of different prey fishes.猎人与猎物——三种棘鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)和不同猎物鱼类幼虫之间的捕食者-被捕食者相互作用的 3D 分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256427. eCollection 2021.
4
Fire as a driver and mediator of predator-prey interactions.火作为驱动和调节捕食者-猎物相互作用的因素。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Aug;97(4):1539-1558. doi: 10.1111/brv.12853. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
The measure of spatial position within groups that best predicts predation risk depends on group movement.群体内部空间位置的度量指标,能够最好地预测捕食风险,这取决于群体的运动方式。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Sep 8;288(1958):20211286. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1286. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
Are behavioral responses to eyespots in sticklebacks influenced by the visual environment? An experimental examination.棘鱼对眼斑的行为反应会受到视觉环境的影响吗?一项实验研究。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul 5;12(7):e9089. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9089. eCollection 2022 Jul.
7
Threats from the air: Damselfly predation on diverse prey taxa.来自空中的威胁:豆娘对多种猎物类群的捕食。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Jun;89(6):1365-1374. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13184. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Do intraspecific or interspecific interactions determine responses to predators feeding on a shared size-structured prey community?种内或种间相互作用决定了对以共享的大小结构猎物群落为食的捕食者的反应吗?
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):414-26. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12305. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
9
Small scale spatial heterogeneity influences predation success in an unexpected way: Model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Acarina).小规模空间异质性以一种意想不到的方式影响捕食成功率:捕食螨(蜱螨目)功能反应的模型实验。
Oecologia. 1983 Feb;56(2-3):249-256. doi: 10.1007/BF00379698.
10
The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.警惕性对集团内捕食的影响。
J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 21;249(2):218-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.07.031. Epub 2007 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic colour change in zebrafish () across multiple contexts.斑马鱼在多种环境下的动态颜色变化。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 8;12(1):241073. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241073. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Collective responses of flocking sheep (Ovis aries) to a herding dog (border collie).群体绵羊(Ovis aries)对牧羊犬(边境牧羊犬)的集体反应。
Commun Biol. 2024 Nov 20;7(1):1543. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07245-8.
3
Selfish herd effects in aggregated caterpillars and their interaction with warning signals.聚集状态下毛毛虫的自私群集效应及其与预警信号的相互作用。

本文引用的文献

1
The confusion effect when attacking simulated three-dimensional starling flocks.攻击模拟三维椋鸟群时的混淆效应。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jan 18;4(1):160564. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160564. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Dazzle camouflage, target tracking, and the confusion effect.迷彩伪装、目标跟踪与混淆效应。
Behav Ecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):1547-1551. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arw081. Epub 2016 May 31.
3
The anti-predator role of within-nest emergence synchrony in sea turtle hatchlings.海龟幼崽巢穴内出壳同步的反捕食者作用。
Biol Lett. 2024 May;20(5):20240050. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0050. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Virtual prey with Lévy motion are preferentially attacked by predatory fish.具有 Lévy 运动的虚拟猎物更容易受到掠食性鱼类的攻击。
Behav Ecol. 2023 May 18;34(4):695-699. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arad039. eCollection 2023 Jul-Aug.
5
'Selfish herders' finish last in mobile animal groups.自私的牧人在移动的动物群体中处于劣势。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Oct 26;289(1985):20221653. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1653.
6
Raptors avoid the confusion effect by targeting fixed points in dense aerial prey aggregations.猛禽通过瞄准密集空中猎物群中的固定点来避免混淆效应。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 23;13(1):4778. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32354-5.
7
Both prey and predator features predict the individual predation risk and survival of schooling prey.被捕食者和捕食者的特征都可以预测群体捕食风险和被捕食者的个体存活率。
Elife. 2022 Jul 19;11:e76344. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76344.
8
Responsive robotic prey reveal how predators adapt to predictability in escape tactics.响应式机器人猎物揭示了捕食者如何适应逃避策略的可预测性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 7;119(23):e2117858119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117858119. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
9
Collective motion diminishes, but variation between groups emerges, through time in fish shoals.在鱼群中,随着时间推移,群体运动减弱,但群体间的差异出现了。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Oct 20;8(10):210655. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210655. eCollection 2021 Oct.
10
The measure of spatial position within groups that best predicts predation risk depends on group movement.群体内部空间位置的度量指标,能够最好地预测捕食风险,这取决于群体的运动方式。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Sep 8;288(1958):20211286. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1286. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 13;283(1834). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0697.
4
A Sensory-Driven Trade-Off between Coordinated Motion in Social Prey and a Predator's Visual Confusion.社会猎物的协调运动与捕食者视觉混淆之间的感官驱动权衡
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Feb 25;12(2):e1004708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004708. eCollection 2016 Feb.
5
Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk.群体移动:密度和不可预测的运动如何影响捕食风险。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2015;69(6):867-872. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-1885-1. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Predatory fish select for coordinated collective motion in virtual prey.掠夺性鱼类选择在虚拟猎物中进行协调的集体运动。
Science. 2012 Sep 7;337(6099):1212-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1218919. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
7
Unified effects of aggregation reveal larger prey groups take longer to find.聚集的统一效应表明,较大的猎物群体需要更长的时间才能找到。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Oct 7;278(1720):2985-90. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0003. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
8
The effect of prey density on predators: conspicuousness and attack success are sensitive to spatial scale.猎物密度对捕食者的影响:显眼程度和攻击成功率对空间尺度敏感。
Am Nat. 2009 Apr;173(4):499-506. doi: 10.1086/597219.
9
Interactions between background matching and motion during visual detection can explain why cryptic animals keep still.视觉检测过程中背景匹配与运动之间的相互作用可以解释保护色动物为何保持静止。
Biol Lett. 2009 Apr 23;5(2):191-3. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0758. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
10
Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).暴露于捕食风险会使三刺鱼(Gasterosteus aculeatus)形成个性。
Ecol Lett. 2007 Sep;10(9):828-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01081.x.