• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较纸质版和电子版回顾性活动空间数据收集模式

Comparing Paper and Tablet Modes of Retrospective Activity Space Data Collection.

作者信息

Yabiku Scott T, Glick Jennifer E, Wentz Elizabeth A, Ghimire Dirgha, Zhao Qunshan

机构信息

The Pennsylvania State University.

Arizona State University.

出版信息

Surv Res Methods. 2017;11(3):329-344. doi: 10.18148/srm/2017.v11i3.6741.

DOI:10.18148/srm/2017.v11i3.6741
PMID:29623133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5881931/
Abstract

Individual actions are both constrained and facilitated by the social context in which individuals are embedded. But research to test specific hypotheses about the role of space on human behaviors and well-being is limited by the difficulty of collecting accurate and personally relevant social context data. We report on a project in Chitwan, Nepal, that directly addresses challenges to collect accurate activity space data. We test if a computer assisted interviewing (CAI) tablet-based approach to collecting activity space data was more accurate than a paper map-based approach; we also examine which subgroups of respondents provided more accurate data with the tablet mode compared to paper. Results show that the tablet approach yielded more accurate data when comparing respondent-indicated locations to the known locations as verified by on-the-ground staff. In addition, the accuracy of the data provided by older and less healthy respondents benefited more from the tablet mode.

摘要

个体行为既受到个体所处社会环境的限制,也受到其促进。但是,由于难以收集准确且与个人相关的社会环境数据,旨在检验关于空间对人类行为和福祉作用的特定假设的研究受到了限制。我们报告了尼泊尔奇旺的一个项目,该项目直接应对了收集准确活动空间数据的挑战。我们测试了基于计算机辅助访谈(CAI)平板电脑的活动空间数据收集方法是否比基于纸质地图的方法更准确;我们还研究了与纸质方式相比,哪些受访者子群体使用平板电脑模式提供的数据更准确。结果表明,将受访者指出的位置与实地工作人员核实的已知位置进行比较时,平板电脑方法产生的数据更准确。此外,年龄较大和健康状况较差的受访者提供的数据准确性从平板电脑模式中受益更多。

相似文献

1
Comparing Paper and Tablet Modes of Retrospective Activity Space Data Collection.比较纸质版和电子版回顾性活动空间数据收集模式
Surv Res Methods. 2017;11(3):329-344. doi: 10.18148/srm/2017.v11i3.6741.
2
Successful use of tablet personal computers and wireless technologies for the 2011 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey.成功应用平板电脑和无线技术进行 2011 年尼泊尔人口与健康调查。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Jul 11;1(2):277-84. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-12-00056. eCollection 2013 Aug.
3
Female respondent acceptance of computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) for maternal, newborn and child health coverage surveys in rural Uganda.乌干达农村地区女性受访者对用于孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康覆盖情况调查的计算机辅助个人访谈(CAPI)的接受度。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Feb;98:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.009. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
6
Score equivalence of paper-, tablet-, and interactive voice response system-based versions of PROMIS, PRO-CTCAE, and numerical rating scales among cancer patients.基于纸质版、平板电脑版和交互式语音应答系统版的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)、癌症治疗功能评估-通用版(PRO-CTCAE)及数字评定量表在癌症患者中的评分等效性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Sep 17;5(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00368-0.
7
Research data collection methods: from paper to tablet computers.研究数据收集方法:从纸笔到平板电脑。
Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S68-73. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7.
8
Computer tablet or telephone? A randomised controlled trial exploring two methods of collecting data from drug and alcohol outpatients.平板电脑还是电话?一项探索从药物和酒精门诊患者收集数据的两种方法的随机对照试验。
Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;71:111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.009. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
9
Tablet-Based Functional MRI of the Trail Making Test: Effect of Tablet Interaction Mode.基于平板电脑的连线测验功能磁共振成像:平板电脑交互模式的影响
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Oct 24;11:496. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00496. eCollection 2017.
10
Web-Based Data Collection for Older Adults Living With HIV in a Clinical Research Setting: Pilot Observational Study.基于网络的 HIV 老年感染者临床研究数据收集:初步观察研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 11;22(11):e18588. doi: 10.2196/18588.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Space in Geographical Analysis.在地理分析中创造空间。
Geogr Anal. 2023 Apr;55(2):325-341. doi: 10.1111/gean.12325. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
2
Egalitarian Attitudes and Activity Spaces in Chitwan, Nepal.尼泊尔奇旺的平等主义态度与活动空间
Spat Demogr. 2023 Apr;11(1):1-24. doi: 10.1007/s40980-023-00115-7. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
3
Drivers of prohibited natural resource collection in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.尼泊尔奇特旺国家公园内禁止的自然资源采集活动的驱动因素。
Environ Conserv. 2022 Jun;49(2):114-121. doi: 10.1017/s0376892922000121. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
Neighborhoods, Activity Spaces, and the Span of Adolescent Exposures.社区、活动空间与青少年接触范围
Am Sociol Rev. 2021 Mar 18;86(2):201-233. doi: 10.1177/0003122421994219. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Using the Web to Collect Data on Sensitive Behaviours: A Study Looking at Mode Effects on the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.利用网络收集敏感行为数据:一项关于方式效应的研究——以英国全国性态度与生活方式调查为例
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0147983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147983. eCollection 2016.
2
Multiple contexts of exposure: Activity spaces, residential neighborhoods, and self-rated health.多种暴露环境:活动空间、居住社区与自评健康状况
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;146:204-13. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.040. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Youth activity spaces and daily exposure to tobacco outlets.青少年活动空间与日常接触烟草销售点。
Health Place. 2015 Jul;34:30-3. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
4
Differences in associations between active transportation and built environmental exposures when expressed using different components of individual activity spaces.当使用个体活动空间的不同组成部分来表示时,主动出行与建成环境暴露之间关联的差异。
Health Place. 2015 May;33:195-202. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
5
Moving Beyond Neighborhood: Activity Spaces and Ecological Networks As Contexts for Youth Development.超越邻里范畴:作为青少年发展背景的活动空间与生态网络
Cityscape. 2014 Jan 1;16(1):165-196.
6
A comparison of tablet computer and paper-based questionnaires in healthy aging research.平板电脑与纸质问卷在健康老龄化研究中的比较
JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Jul 16;3(3):e38. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3291.
7
Neighborhood Effects in Temporal Perspective.从时间角度看邻里效应。
Am Sociol Rev. 2011 Oct 1;76(5):713-736. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420816. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
8
Activity space environment and dietary and physical activity behaviors: a pilot study.活动空间环境与饮食和身体活动行为:一项初步研究。
Health Place. 2011 Sep;17(5):1150-61. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DIMENSIONS OF NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS ON HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION.邻里环境对高中毕业率影响的空间和时间维度
Soc Sci Res. 2011 Jan 30;40(1):87-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.04.013.
10
Using Google Street View to audit neighborhood environments.利用谷歌街景来审核社区环境。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jan;40(1):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.09.034.