Loeb Stacy, Folkvaljon Yasin, Robinson David, Lissbrant Ingela Franck, Egevad Lars, Stattin Pär
Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, NY, USA.
Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.036. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
New five-tiered Gleason grade groups (GGGs) were recently proposed, in which Gleason 6 is GGG 1, Gleason 3+4 is GGG 2, Gleason 4+3 is GGG 3, Gleason 8 is GGG 4, and Gleason 9-10 is GGG 5.
To examine the performance of the new GGGs in men with prostate cancer from a nationwide population-based cohort.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, we identified 5880 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2005 to 2007, including 4325 who had radical prostatectomy and 1555 treated with radiation therapy.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards models, and concordance indices were used to examine the relationship between the GGGs and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy.
Among men treated with surgery, the 4-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 89%, 82%, 74%, 77%, and 49% for GGG 1-5 on biopsy, and 92%, 85%, 73%, 63%, and 51% based on prostatectomy GGG, respectively. For men treated by radiation therapy, men with biopsy GGG of 1-5 had 4-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival rates of 95%, 91%, 85%, 78%, and 70%. Adjusting for preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen and clinical stage, biopsy GGGs were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The new 5-tier system resulted in virtually no change in predictive accuracy compared with the current 3- and 4-tier classifications. Limitations include a median follow-up of 4.6 yr, precluding the ability to examine long-term oncologic outcomes.
The newly proposed GGGs offer a simplified, user-friendly nomenclature to aid in patient counseling, with similar predictive accuracy in a population-based setting to previous classifications.
The new Gleason grade groups, ranging from 1-5, provide a simplified, user-friendly classification system to predict the risk of recurrence after prostatectomy and radiation therapy.
最近提出了新的五级Gleason分级组(GGGs),其中Gleason 6为GGG 1,Gleason 3+4为GGG 2,Gleason 4+3为GGG 3,Gleason 8为GGG 4,Gleason 9 - 10为GGG 5。
在一个基于全国人群的队列中,检验新的GGGs在前列腺癌男性患者中的性能。
设计、设置和参与者:从瑞典国家前列腺癌登记处,我们确定了2005年至2007年期间被诊断为前列腺癌的5880名男性,其中4325人接受了根治性前列腺切除术,1555人接受了放射治疗。
采用Kaplan - Meier生存分析、Cox比例风险模型和一致性指数,来检验GGGs与根治性前列腺切除术后和放射治疗后生化复发之间的关系。
在接受手术治疗的男性中,活检时GGG 1 - 5的4年无生化复发生存率分别为89%、82%、74%、77%和49%,基于前列腺切除术后GGG的相应生存率分别为92%、85%、73%、63%和51%。对于接受放射治疗的男性,活检GGG为1 - 5的男性4年无生化复发生存率分别为95%、91%、85%、78%和70%。在对术前血清前列腺特异性抗原和临床分期进行校正后,活检GGGs是根治性前列腺切除术后和放射治疗后生化复发的显著独立预测因素。与当前的三级和四级分类相比,新的五级系统在预测准确性方面几乎没有变化。局限性包括中位随访时间为4.6年,无法检验长期肿瘤学结局。
新提出的GGGs提供了一种简化、用户友好的命名法,有助于患者咨询,在基于人群的环境中与先前的分类具有相似的预测准确性。
新的Gleason分级组,范围从1 - 5,提供了一个简化、用户友好的分类系统,以预测前列腺切除术后和放射治疗后的复发风险。