Piest Benjamin A, Isberner Maj-Britt, Richter Tobias
Department of Psychology IV, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):849-863. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0807-7.
Previous research has shown that the validation of incoming information during language comprehension is a fast, efficient, and routine process (epistemic monitoring). Previous research on this topic has focused on epistemic monitoring during reading. The present study extended this research by investigating epistemic monitoring of audiovisual information. In a Stroop-like paradigm, participants (Experiment 1: adults; Experiment 2: 10-year-old children) responded to the probe words correct and false by keypress after the presentation of auditory assertions that could be either true or false with respect to concurrently presented pictures. Results provide evidence for routine validation of audiovisual information. Moreover, the results show a stronger and more stable interference effect for children compared with adults.
先前的研究表明,在语言理解过程中对传入信息进行验证是一个快速、高效且常规的过程(认知监测)。此前关于该主题的研究主要集中在阅读过程中的认知监测。本研究通过调查视听信息的认知监测扩展了这一研究。在一个类似斯特鲁普的范式中,参与者(实验1:成年人;实验2:10岁儿童)在呈现关于同时呈现的图片可能为真或假的听觉断言后,通过按键对探测词的对错做出反应。结果为视听信息的常规验证提供了证据。此外,结果表明,与成年人相比,儿童的干扰效应更强且更稳定。