• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Raise the Bar, Not the Threshold Value: Meeting Patient Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care.

作者信息

McCaffrey Nikki, Eckermann Simon

机构信息

Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia.

Centre for Health Service Development, Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Jun;2(2):93-95. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0039-y.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-017-0039-y
PMID:29623615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5972111/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Raise the Bar, Not the Threshold Value: Meeting Patient Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care.提高标准，而非阈值：满足患者对姑息治疗和临终关怀的偏好。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2018 Jun;2(2):93-95. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0039-y.
2
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响：对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
3
Opportunities to maximize value with integrated palliative care.通过综合姑息治疗实现价值最大化的机会。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 5;9:219-26. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S90822. eCollection 2016.
4
Patient-centered family meetings in palliative care: a quality improvement project to explore a new model of family meetings with patients and families at the end of life.姑息治疗中以患者为中心的家庭会议：一项质量改进项目，旨在探索一种在生命末期与患者及其家属召开家庭会议的新模式。
Ann Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;6(Suppl 2):S195-S205. doi: 10.21037/apm.2017.08.11. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
5
Patients' preferences in palliative care: A systematic mixed studies review.姑息治疗中患者的偏好：一项系统的混合研究综述。
Palliat Med. 2015 May;29(5):399-419. doi: 10.1177/0269216314557882. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
6
Associations Between Personality and End-of-Life Care Preferences Among Men With Prostate Cancer: A Clustering Approach.前列腺癌男性患者的人格与临终关怀偏好之间的关联：一种聚类分析方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jan;51(1):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
7
Evaluation of palliative care training and skills retention by medical students.医学生对姑息治疗培训及技能保持情况的评估。
J Surg Res. 2017 May 1;211:172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
8
The effect of underlying health status on patient or surrogate preferences for end-of-life care: a pilot study.潜在健康状况对患者或替代者临终关怀偏好的影响：一项试点研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2007 Jun-Jul;24(3):185-90. doi: 10.1177/1049909106299062.
9
A Comparison of the Influence of Anticipated Death Trajectory and Personal Values on End-of-Life Care Preferences: A Qualitative Analysis.预期死亡轨迹与个人价值观对临终关怀偏好的影响比较：一项质性分析
Clin Gerontol. 2019 May-Jun;42(3):247-258. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2017.1365796. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
10
Death and the Oldest Old: Attitudes and Preferences for End-of-Life Care--Qualitative Research within a Population-Based Cohort Study.死亡与高龄老人：临终关怀的态度与偏好——基于人群队列研究的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 5;11(4):e0150686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150686. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the economic and social return on investment for telephone cancer information and support services in Australia? An evaluative social return on investment study protocol.澳大利亚电话癌症信息和支持服务的投资经济和社会效益回报是什么？一项评估性社会投资回报研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e081425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081425.
2
Aligning opportunity cost and net benefit criteria: the health shadow price.使机会成本和净收益标准一致：健康影子价格。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 6;12:1212439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1212439. eCollection 2024.
3
Methodological challenges and potential solutions for economic evaluations of palliative and end-of-life care: A systematic review.姑息治疗和临终关怀的经济评估方法学挑战及潜在解决方案：系统综述。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jan;38(1):85-99. doi: 10.1177/02692163231214124. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
4
What Aspects of Quality of Life are Important from Palliative Care Patients' Perspectives? A Framework Analysis to Inform Preference-Based Measures for Palliative and End-of-Life Settings.从姑息治疗患者的角度来看，哪些方面的生活质量很重要？一个框架分析，为姑息治疗和生命终末期环境下的偏好测量提供信息。
Patient. 2024 Jan;17(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00651-w. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
An analysis of the construct validity and responsiveness of the ICECAP-SCM capability wellbeing measure in a palliative care hospice setting.在姑息治疗临终关怀环境中，对 ICECAP-SCM 能力福利衡量标准的结构有效性和反应度进行分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 8;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01012-4.
6
Multiple effects health economic evaluation of the Ahead of The Game Study for mental health promotion in sporting club communities.“领先一步研究”对体育俱乐部社区促进心理健康的多重效应健康经济评估
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Aug 5;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00323-1.
7
Methodological aspects of economic evaluations conducted in the palliative or end of life care settings: a systematic review protocol.姑息治疗或生命终末期护理环境下经济评估的方法学方面：系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 27;10(5):e035760. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035760.

本文引用的文献

1
An economic view on the current state of the economics of palliative and end-of-life care.对姑息治疗与临终关怀经济学现状的经济学视角审视
Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;31(4):291-292. doi: 10.1177/0269216317695677.
2
Development of a Patient-Reported Palliative Care-Specific Health Classification System: The POS-E.患者报告的姑息治疗特定健康分类系统的开发：POS-E。
Patient. 2017 Jun;10(3):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0224-1.
3
Using Multicriteria Approaches to Assess the Value of Health Care.运用多标准方法评估医疗保健的价值。
Value Health. 2017 Feb;20(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.011.
4
Priority to End of Life Treatments? Views of the Public in the Netherlands.临终治疗的优先级？荷兰公众的观点。
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.544. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
5
Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness.全民健康覆盖的优先事项设定：我们需要基于证据的审议过程，而不仅仅是更多关于成本效益的证据。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Nov 1;5(11):615-618. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.83.
6
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量：南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
7
Clinical trials of medicinal cannabis for appetite-related symptoms from advanced cancer: a survey of preferences, attitudes and beliefs among patients willing to consider participation.临床研究医用大麻对晚期癌症相关食欲症状的疗效：愿意考虑参与的患者对其偏好、态度和信念的调查。
Intern Med J. 2016 Nov;46(11):1269-1275. doi: 10.1111/imj.13224.
8
What Aspects of Quality of Life Are Important From Palliative Care Patients' Perspectives? A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research.从姑息治疗患者的角度来看，生活质量的哪些方面是重要的？一项定性研究的系统综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Aug;52(2):318-328.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
'The ICECAP-SCM tells you more about what I'm going through': A think-aloud study measuring quality of life among patients receiving supportive and palliative care.“ICECAP-SCM让你更了解我的经历”：一项测量接受支持性和姑息治疗患者生活质量的出声思考研究。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;30(7):642-52. doi: 10.1177/0269216315624890. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
10
Complex Valuation: Applying Ideas from the Complex Intervention Framework to Valuation of a New Measure for End-of-Life Care.复杂评估：将复杂干预框架中的理念应用于临终关怀新措施的评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 May;34(5):499-508. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0365-9.