• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

New visual field indices of disharmony for early diagnosis of glaucoma, alone or associated with conventional parameters.

作者信息

Abreu-Gonzalez Rodrigo, Gonzalez-Hernandez Marta, Pena-Betancor Cristina, Rodriguez-Esteve Paloma, Gonzalez De La Rosa Manuel

机构信息

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of La Candelaria, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain.

2 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;28(5):590-597. doi: 10.1177/1120672118762668. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1177/1120672118762668
PMID:29623722
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the specificity of new perimetric indices based on harmony, alone and in combination with structural data, for glaucoma detection.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cross-sectional study, one eye of 105 healthy subjects and 97 early and suspect glaucomas were sequentially included and examined with Cirrus optical coherence tomography, twice with OCULUS Smartfield perimeter (SPARK strategy) and twice with Humphrey Analyzer (24-2 SITA-Fast) at the Ophthalmology Department from the University Hospital La Candelaria. Disharmony in the visual field was evaluated including vertical threshold symmetry, threshold rank), and homogeneity (threshold standard deviation from its maximum) using the patient himself/herself as a reference. We also evaluated disharmony in combination with the mean deviation and the pattern standard deviation in a single index (mismatch) and various combinations of morphological and functional indices. Combinations used a new score based on values above certain critical cut-off levels of each index.

RESULTS

For 95% specificity, the highest sensitivities were as follows: vertical cup/disc ratio: 28.9%; SPARK threshold rank: 29.9%; and SITA-Fast threshold standard deviation: 28.9%. For the combined indices and 100% specificity, they were 5 SPARK indices mismatch: 10.3%; 5 SITA-Fast indices mismatch: 11.3%; 8 optical coherence tomography indices: 21.9%; 13 SPARK and optical coherence tomography indices: 27.8%; and 13 SITA-Fast and optical coherence tomography indices: 32.0%.

CONCLUSION

Disharmony combined with normative value-based indices and/or optical coherence tomography indices is useful for very specific early diagnosis of glaucoma.

摘要

相似文献

1
New visual field indices of disharmony for early diagnosis of glaucoma, alone or associated with conventional parameters.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;28(5):590-597. doi: 10.1177/1120672118762668. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.高眼压症和青光眼患者中 Humphrey 30-2 SITA 标准测试、Matrix 30-2 阈值测试与海德堡视网膜断层扫描之间的关系。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Apr-May;17(3):203-10. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815a3493.
3
Six-month Longitudinal Comparison of a Portable Tablet Perimeter With the Humphrey Field Analyzer.便携式平板电脑与 Humphrey 视野分析仪的 6 个月纵向比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;190:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
4
Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者视野评估的两种快速策略(SITA快速策略和TOP策略)的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0482-y. Epub 2002 May 15.
5
Comparison of 24-2 Faster, Fast, and Standard Programs of Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm of Humphrey Field Analyzer for Perimetry in Patients With Manifest and Suspect Glaucoma.比较 24-2 快速、快速和标准程序的瑞典交互式阈值算法的 Humphrey 视野分析仪在有明显和可疑青光眼的患者中的视野检查。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Nov;29(11):1070-1076. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001611.
6
Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.早期青光眼患者中快蓝黄视野检查与标准自动视野计检查的诊断敏感性:不同检测程序的比较
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jul;113(7):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.12.028.
7
Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.瑞典交互式阈值算法对青光眼性视野缺损的敏感性和特异性。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jun;109(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01047-3.
8
The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.青光眼的SITA视野阈值算法
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Aug;40(9):1998-2009.
9
A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma.青光眼患者中 SITA Fast 与 SITA Standard 策略的视野参数比较。
J Glaucoma. 2020 Sep;29(9):783-788. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001551.
10
Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA.SPARK Precision 阈值算法和 SITA 对局限性和弥漫性视野缺失的定量比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun;260(6):1983-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05430-7. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Fully Automated Colorimetric Analysis of the Optic Nerve Aided by Deep Learning and Its Association with Perimetry and OCT for the Study of Glaucoma.深度学习辅助的视神经全自动比色分析及其与视野检查和光学相干断层扫描在青光眼研究中的关联
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 22;10(15):3231. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153231.