• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与全球外科手术学术合作的障碍及可能的解决方案:一项定性研究。

Barriers to participation in global surgery academic collaborations, and possible solutions: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Fallah Parisa Nicole, Bernstein Mark

机构信息

1Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

2Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto; and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 6;130(4):1157-1165. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17435. Print 2019 Apr 1.

DOI:10.3171/2017.10.JNS17435
PMID:29624152
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is a global lack of access to surgical care, and this issue disproportionately affects those in low- and middle-income countries. Global surgery academic collaborations (GSACs) between surgeons in high-income countries and those in low- and middle-income countries are one possible sustainable way to address the global surgical need. The objective of this study was to examine the barriers to participation in GSACs and to suggest ways to increase involvement.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 86 surgeons, anesthesiologists, other physicians, residents, fellows, and nurses from the US, Canada, and Norway was used. Participants were all health care providers from multiple specialties and multiple academic centers with varied involvement in GSACs. More than half of the participants were neurosurgeons. Participants were interviewed in person or over Skype in Toronto over the course of 2 months by using a predetermined set of open-ended questions. Thematic content analysis was used to evaluate the participants' responses.

RESULTS

Based on the data, 3 main themes arose that pointed to individual, community, and system barriers for involvement in GSACs. Individual barriers included loss of income, family commitments, young career, responsibility to local patients, skepticism of global surgery efforts, ethical concerns, and safety concerns. Community barriers included insufficient mentorship and lack of support from colleagues. System barriers included lack of time, minimal academic recognition, insufficient awareness, insufficient administrative support and organization, and low political and funding support.

CONCLUSIONS

Steps can be taken to address some of these barriers and to increase the involvement of surgeons from high-income countries in GSACs. This could lead to a necessary scale-up of global surgery efforts that may help increase worldwide access to surgical care.

摘要

目的

全球范围内外科治疗的可及性不足,且这一问题对低收入和中等收入国家人群的影响尤为严重。高收入国家与低收入和中等收入国家的外科医生之间开展全球外科手术学术合作(GSACs)是满足全球外科手术需求的一种可持续途径。本研究的目的是探讨参与GSACs的障碍,并提出增加参与度的方法。

方法

选取了来自美国、加拿大和挪威的86名外科医生、麻醉师、其他医生、住院医师、研究员和护士作为便利样本。参与者均为来自多个专业和多个学术中心的医疗服务提供者,参与GSACs的程度各不相同。超过半数的参与者为神经外科医生。在2个月的时间里,通过使用一组预先确定的开放式问题,对参与者进行了面对面访谈或在多伦多通过Skype进行访谈。采用主题内容分析法对参与者的回答进行评估。

结果

基于数据,出现了3个主要主题,指出了参与GSACs的个人、社区和系统障碍。个人障碍包括收入损失、家庭责任、职业生涯初期、对当地患者的责任、对全球外科手术努力的怀疑、伦理问题和安全问题。社区障碍包括指导不足和同事支持缺乏。系统障碍包括时间不足、学术认可度低、认识不足、行政支持和组织不足,以及政治和资金支持低。

结论

可以采取措施解决其中一些障碍,并增加高收入国家外科医生参与GSACs的程度。这可能会促使全球外科手术努力进行必要的扩大,有助于增加全球范围内外科治疗的可及性。

相似文献

1
Barriers to participation in global surgery academic collaborations, and possible solutions: a qualitative study.参与全球外科手术学术合作的障碍及可能的解决方案:一项定性研究。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 6;130(4):1157-1165. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17435. Print 2019 Apr 1.
2
Unifying a fragmented effort: a qualitative framework for improving international surgical teaching collaborations.整合分散的努力:改善国际外科教学合作的定性框架
Global Health. 2017 Sep 7;13(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0296-7.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
What factors influence the production of orthopaedic research in East Africa? A qualitative analysis of interviews.哪些因素影响东非骨科研究的产出?一项访谈的定性分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):2120-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4254-5. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
6
Global cardiothoracic surgery: A survey of trainees' interests and barriers.全球心胸外科手术:实习生兴趣与障碍的调查
JTCVS Open. 2023 Oct 1;16:610-618. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.08.026. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Value of Global Surgical Activities for US Academic Health Centers: A Position Paper by the Association for Academic Surgery Global Affairs Committee, Society of University Surgeons Committee on Global Academic Surgery, and American College of Surgeons' Operation Giving Back.美国学术健康中心全球外科活动的价值:由美国外科学院全球事务委员会、大学外科医生学会全球学术外科委员会和美国外科医师学会Operation Giving Back 联合发布的立场文件。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):455-466.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.07.661. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
An academic career in global surgery: a position paper from the Society of University Surgeons Committee on Academic Global Surgery.全球外科学术生涯:来自大学外科学会全球外科学术委员会的立场文件。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Global surgery interest and engagement in Canadian thoracic surgery practice.全球对加拿大胸外科手术实践的兴趣与参与情况。
JTCVS Open. 2025 May 4;25:501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.03.020. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
With equity in mind: Evaluating an interactive hybrid global surgery course for cross-site interdisciplinary learners.考虑到公平性:评估一门面向跨站点跨学科学习者的交互式混合式全球外科课程。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 4;3(5):e0001778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001778. eCollection 2023.
3
Partnering to build surgical capacity in low-resource settings: a qualitative study of Canadian global surgeons.
在资源匮乏环境中建立外科能力的合作伙伴关系:对加拿大全球外科医生的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):e070148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070148.
4
International Survey of Medical Students Exposure to Relevant Global Surgery (ISOMERS): A Cross-Sectional Study.医学生全球相关外科手术接触情况国际调查(ISOMERS):一项横断面研究。
World J Surg. 2022 Jul;46(7):1577-1584. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06440-0. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
5
Trainee Perspectives Regarding Advanced Clinical Global Health Fellowships in North America.北美高级临床全球健康研究员奖学金学员观点。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Apr 19;104(6):2286-2292. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1589.
6
Letter to the Editor Regarding "A Bibliographic Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Global Neurosurgery".致编辑的信:关于“全球神经外科领域被引用次数最多文章的文献计量分析”
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:533-534. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.196.
7
A Bibliographic Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Global Neurosurgery.全球神经外科学高被引文献的书目分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e195-e203. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.08.084. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
8
Ethical considerations in global surgery: a scoping review.全球外科手术中的伦理考量:范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Apr 21;5(4):e002319. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002319. eCollection 2020.
9
Global neurosurgery: continued momentum at the 72nd World Health Assembly.全球神经外科学:第 72 届世界卫生大会的持续动力。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 17;132(4):1256-1260. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS191823. Print 2020 Apr 1.
10
A China - Vietnam collaboration for public health care: a preliminary study.一项中国与越南公共卫生保健合作的初步研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2019 Aug 30;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s41256-019-0116-0. eCollection 2019.