Maha Hussain, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Catherine M. Tangen, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Daniel W. Lin, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Ian M. Thompson Jr, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio; Gregory P. Swanson, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX; David P. Wood, Beaumont Physician Partners and Clinical Faculty, Royal Oak; Wael Sakr, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI; Nancy A. Dawson, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC; Naomi B. Haas, Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Thomas W. Flaig, E. David Crawford, and L. Michael Glode, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO; Tanya B. Dorff and David I. Quinn, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; and Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 20;36(15):1498-1504. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4126. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
Purpose Patients with high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy are at risk for death. Adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) may reduce this risk. We hypothesized that the addition of mitoxantrone and prednisone (MP) to adjuvant ADT could reduce mortality compared with adjuvant ADT alone. Methods Eligible patients had cT1-3N0 prostate cancer with one or more high-risk factors after radical prostatectomy (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 8; pT3b, pT4, or pN+ disease; GS 7 and positive margins; or preoperative prostate-specific antigen [PSA] > 15 ng/mL, biopsy GS score > 7, or PSA > 10 ng/mL plus biopsy GS > 6. Patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy were stratified by pT/N stage, GS, and adjuvant radiation plan and randomly assigned to ADT (bicalutamide and goserelin for 2 years) or ADT plus six cycles of MP. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Median OS was projected to be 10 years in the ADT arm, requiring 680 patients per arm to detect a hazard ratio of 1.30 with 92% power and one-sided α = .05. Results Nine hundred sixty-one eligible intent-to-treat patients were randomly assigned to ADT or ADT + MP from October 1999 to January 2007, when the Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping accrual as a result of higher leukemia incidence with ADT + MP. Median follow-up was 11.2 years. The 10-year OS estimates were 87% with ADT (expected 50%) and 86% with ADT + MP (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.43). The 10-year estimate for disease-free survival was 72% for both arms. Prostate cancer was the cause of death in 18% of patients in the ADT arm and 22% in the ADT + MP arm. More patients in the MP arm died of other cancers (36% v 18% in ADT alone arm). Conclusion MP did not improve OS and increased deaths from other malignancies. The DFS and 10-year OS in these patients treated with 2 years of ADT were encouraging compared with historical estimates, although a definitive conclusion regarding value of ADT may not be made without a nontreatment control arm.
根治性前列腺切除术后患有高危前列腺癌的患者有死亡风险。辅助去势治疗(ADT)可能降低这种风险。我们假设米托蒽醌和泼尼松(MP)联合辅助 ADT 可降低死亡率,与单独辅助 ADT 相比。
符合条件的患者为根治性前列腺切除术后具有一种或多种高危因素的 cT1-3N0 前列腺癌(Gleason 评分[GS]≥8;pT3b、pT4 或 pN+疾病;GS7 且有阳性切缘;或术前前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]>15ng/ml、活检 GS 评分>7、或 PSA>10ng/ml 加活检 GS>6。根治性前列腺切除术后 PSA≤0.2ng/ml 的患者根据 pT/N 分期、GS 和辅助放疗计划进行分层,并随机分配至 ADT(比卡鲁胺和戈舍瑞林治疗 2 年)或 ADT 加 6 个周期的 MP。主要终点是总生存(OS)。ADT 组的中位 OS 预计为 10 年,需要每组 680 例患者才能检测到危险比为 1.30,有 92%的功效和单侧α=0.05。
1999 年 10 月至 2007 年 1 月,961 名符合意向治疗的合格患者被随机分配至 ADT 或 ADT+MP 组,当时数据安全监测委员会建议因 ADT+MP 组白血病发病率较高而停止入组。中位随访时间为 11.2 年。ADT 组的 10 年 OS 估计值为 87%(预期为 50%),ADT+MP 组为 86%(危险比,1.06;95%CI,0.79 至 1.43)。两组的无病生存 10 年估计值均为 72%。ADT 组有 18%的患者死于前列腺癌,ADT+MP 组有 22%的患者死于前列腺癌。MP 组更多的患者死于其他癌症(36%比 ADT 组单独治疗的 18%)。
MP 并未改善 OS,并增加了其他恶性肿瘤的死亡。与历史估计值相比,这些接受 2 年 ADT 治疗的患者的 DFS 和 10 年 OS 令人鼓舞,尽管如果没有非治疗对照组,可能无法得出 ADT 价值的确切结论。