• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤聚焦型团体干预对年轻难民的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of a trauma-focused group intervention for young refugees: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;59(11):1171-1179. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12908. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1111/jcpp.12908
PMID:29624664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As access to evidence-based treatments for young refugees with posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) is limited, we developed the trauma-focused group intervention Mein Weg to be delivered by trained social workers. A recently published pilot study delivered preliminary evidence of the intervention with regard to symptom reduction and its feasibility. The aim of this study was, therefore, to determine whether the intervention, in addition to usual care (UC), is more effective in reducing PTSS (primary outcome) compared to UC alone.

METHODS

A parallel group randomized controlled trial was conducted in seven German child and adolescent welfare agencies. Participants were randomly assigned to either six sessions Mein Weg (n = 50; M = 17.00, 94% male) or UC (n = 49; M = 16.92, 92% male). Mixed effect models, with fixed effects of group and time as well as their interaction, were performed on the relevant outcome measures. This trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (#DRKS00010915, https://www.drks.de/drks_web/).

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses showed that Mein Weg was significantly superior to UC regarding symptom improvement of self-reported PTSS (Mein Weg: d = .61, UC: d = .15) and depression (Mein Weg: d = .63, UC: d = -.06), but not regarding caregiver-reported symptoms and self-reported dysfunctional posttraumatic cognitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mein Weg is effective for young refugees according to self-reports and can be viewed as a valuable component in a stepped care approach for this vulnerable population. The findings need to be replicated with independent clinical assessments.

摘要

背景

由于获得针对创伤后应激症状 (PTSS) 的年轻难民的循证治疗的机会有限,我们开发了由经过培训的社会工作者提供的以创伤为中心的小组干预措施 Mein Weg。最近发表的一项试点研究提供了该干预措施在减轻症状及其可行性方面的初步证据。因此,本研究的目的是确定干预措施(除了常规护理 (UC) 外)是否比单独接受 UC 更能有效降低 PTSS(主要结果)。

方法

在七个德国儿童和青少年福利机构中进行了一项平行组随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到六次 Mein Weg (n=50;M=17.00,94%为男性)或 UC(n=49;M=16.92,92%为男性)。使用混合效应模型,固定效应为组和时间及其交互作用,对相关结局测量进行分析。该试验在德国临床试验注册处(#DRKS00010915,https://www.drks.de/drks_web/)进行了注册。

结果

意向治疗分析表明,与 UC 相比,Mein Weg 在自我报告的 PTSS(Mein Weg:d=0.61,UC:d=0.15)和抑郁(Mein Weg:d=0.63,UC:d=-0.06)方面的症状改善方面显著更优,但在照顾者报告的症状和自我报告的创伤后认知功能障碍方面没有差异。

结论

根据自我报告,Mein Weg 对年轻难民有效,可以被视为针对这一弱势群体的阶梯式护理方法的有价值组成部分。需要使用独立的临床评估来复制这些发现。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a trauma-focused group intervention for young refugees: a randomized controlled trial.创伤聚焦型团体干预对年轻难民的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov;59(11):1171-1179. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12908. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
2
Trauma-focused group intervention for unaccompanied young refugees: "Mein Weg"-predictors of treatment outcomes and sustainability of treatment effects.针对无人陪伴的年轻难民的创伤聚焦团体干预:“我的道路”——治疗结果的预测因素及治疗效果的可持续性
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2019 Apr 1;13:18. doi: 10.1186/s13034-019-0277-0. eCollection 2019.
3
Evaluation of a Trauma-Focused Group Intervention for Unaccompanied Young Refugees: A Pilot Study.创伤聚焦型小组干预对无人陪伴未成年难民的效果评估:一项试点研究。
J Trauma Stress. 2017 Oct;30(5):531-536. doi: 10.1002/jts.22218. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
4
Improving mental health care for unaccompanied young refugees through a stepped-care approach versus usual care+: study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled hybrid effectiveness implementation trial.通过阶梯式护理方法对比常规护理改善无人陪伴的年轻难民的心理健康护理+:一项集群随机对照混合有效性实施试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Dec 9;21(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04922-x.
5
HELP@APP: development and evaluation of a self-help app for traumatized Syrian refugees in Germany - a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.帮助@应用程序:为在德国的创伤后叙利亚难民开发和评估自助应用程序 - 一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y.
6
A Self-Help App for Syrian Refugees With Posttraumatic Stress (Sanadak): Randomized Controlled Trial.一款针对有创伤后应激障碍的叙利亚难民的自助应用程序(Sanadak):随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e24807. doi: 10.2196/24807.
7
Brief imagery rescripting vs. usual care and treatment advice in refugees with posttraumatic stress disorder: study protocol for a multi-center randomized-controlled trial.简短意象重述与常规护理及创伤后应激障碍难民治疗建议对照:一项多中心随机对照试验研究方案。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Feb 4;12(1):1872967. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1872967. eCollection 2021.
8
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial: peer-to-peer Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) for adult Syrian refugees in Turkey.一项随机对照试验方案:在土耳其为成年叙利亚难民实施同伴支持的团体问题管理加护(PM+)。
Trials. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4166-x.
9
Traumatized refugees: morbidity, treatment and predictors of outcome.受创伤的难民:发病率、治疗及预后预测因素
Dan Med J. 2014 Aug;61(8):B4871.
10
Successfully treating refugees' post-traumatic stress symptoms in a Ugandan settlement with group cognitive behaviour therapy.在乌干达难民营中采用团体认知行为疗法成功治疗难民创伤后应激症状。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2021 Jan;49(1):35-49. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000478. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Potentially traumatising events and post-traumatic stress symptoms of adolescents in out-of-home care.寄养青少年的潜在创伤性事件及创伤后应激症状
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2486902. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2486902. Epub 2025 May 28.
2
Quality of life in unaccompanied young refugees: the role of traumatic events, post-migration stressors and mental distress.无人陪伴的年轻难民的生活质量:创伤性事件、移民后压力源和精神痛苦的作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 26;25(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06975-1.
3
Effectiveness of trauma-focused treatments for refugee children: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
针对难民儿童的创伤聚焦治疗的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2494362. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2494362. Epub 2025 May 19.
4
Investigating factors influencing utilization of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy among unaccompanied young refugees: an exploratory analysis.调查影响无人陪伴的年轻难民使用创伤聚焦认知行为疗法的因素:一项探索性分析。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Feb 6;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00862-z.
5
Evaluation of ANKOMMEN as a group intervention based on life story work for adolescents in residential care in Germany: a single-arm pilot study.评估德国住院护理机构中基于生活故事工作的“ANKOMMEN”青少年群体干预措施:一项单臂试点研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Oct 22;18(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00817-w.
6
The dissemination and implementation of trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy for children and adolescents in seven European countries.创伤聚焦认知行为疗法在七个欧洲国家的传播和实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):1202. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11689-3.
7
Brief CBT-based psychological interventions to improve mental health outcomes in refugee populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于认知行为疗法的简短心理干预措施对改善难民群体心理健康结局的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2389702. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2389702. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
Examining cognitive behavioral therapy interventions for unaccompanied minors: a systematic review and qualitative research synthesis.考察针对无人陪伴未成年人的认知行为疗法干预措施:一项系统综述与定性研究综合分析
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;34(2):465-481. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02500-z. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Evaluation of "Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools" (CBITS) in child welfare programs in Germany: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.评估德国儿童福利项目中的“创伤认知行为干预”(CBITS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 19;25(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08190-x.
10
Practical recommendations for addressing the psychological needs of unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in England: A literature and service review.满足英国无人陪伴寻求庇护儿童心理需求的实用建议:文献与服务综述
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(2):245-263. doi: 10.1177/13591045241252858. Epub 2024 Jun 13.