• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款针对有创伤后应激障碍的叙利亚难民的自助应用程序(Sanadak):随机对照试验。

A Self-Help App for Syrian Refugees With Posttraumatic Stress (Sanadak): Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e24807. doi: 10.2196/24807.

DOI:10.2196/24807
PMID:33439140
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935251/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Syrian refugees residing in Germany often develop posttraumatic stress as a result of the Syrian civil war, their escape, and postmigration stressors. At the same time, there is a lack of adequate treatment options. The smartphone-based app Sanadak was developed to provide cognitive behavioral therapy-based self-help in the Arabic language for Syrian refugees with posttraumatic stress.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the app.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, eligible individuals were randomly allocated to the intervention group (IG; app use) or control group (CG; psychoeducational reading material). Data were collected during structured face-to-face interviews at 3 assessments (preintervention/baseline, postintervention/after 4 weeks, follow-up/after 4 months). Using adjusted mixed-effects linear regression models, changes in posttraumatic stress and secondary outcomes were investigated as intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated based on adjusted mean total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves using the net benefit approach.

RESULTS

Of 170 screened individuals (aged 18 to 65 years), 133 were eligible and randomized to the IG (n=65) and CG (n=68). Although there was a pre-post reduction in posttraumatic stress, ITT showed no significant differences between the IG and CG after 4 weeks (Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale for DSM-5, Diff -0.90, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.47; P=.52) and after 4 months (Diff -0.39, 95% CI -3.24 to 2.46; P=.79). The same was true for PP. Regarding secondary outcomes, ITT indicated a treatment effect for self-stigma: after 4 weeks (Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale/SSMIS-stereotype agreement: d=0.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.25; stereotype application: d=0.60, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.99) and after 4 months (d=0.52, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.92; d=0.50, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.90), the IG showed significantly lower values in self-stigma than the CG. ITT showed no significant group differences in total costs and QALYs. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 81% for a willingness-to-pay of €0 per additional QALY but decreased with increasing willingness-to-pay.

CONCLUSIONS

Sanadak was not more effective in reducing mild to moderate posttraumatic stress in Syrian refugees than the control condition nor was it likely to be cost-effective. Therefore, Sanadak is not suitable as a standalone treatment. However, as the app usability was very good, no harms detected, and stigma significantly reduced, Sanadak has potential as a bridging aid within a stepped and collaborative care approach.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00013782; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00013782.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y.

摘要

背景

居住在德国的叙利亚难民由于叙利亚内战、逃亡和后移民压力经常患有创伤后应激。同时,缺乏足够的治疗选择。基于智能手机的应用程序 Sanadak 是为了为患有创伤后应激的叙利亚难民提供基于认知行为疗法的阿拉伯语自助服务而开发的。

目的

本研究旨在评估该应用程序的有效性和成本效益。

方法

在一项随机对照试验中,符合条件的个体被随机分配到干预组(IG;应用程序使用)或对照组(CG;心理教育阅读材料)。在 3 次评估(干预前/基线、干预后/4 周后、随访/4 个月后)期间通过结构化面对面访谈收集数据。使用调整后的混合效应线性回归模型,根据意向治疗(ITT)和方案(PP)分析,调查创伤后应激和次要结果的变化。根据调整后的平均总费用、质量调整生命年(QALY)和净收益方法的成本效益接受曲线,评估成本效益。

结果

在 170 名筛查个体(年龄 18 至 65 岁)中,有 133 名符合条件并随机分配到 IG(n=65)和 CG(n=68)。尽管创伤后应激有预后降低,但 ITT 在 4 周后(DSM-5 创伤后诊断量表,差异-0.90,95%置信区间-0.24 至 0.47;P=.52)和 4 个月后(差异-0.39,95%置信区间-3.24 至 2.46;P=.79)IG 和 CG 之间没有显著差异。PP 也是如此。关于次要结果,IT 表明自我污名化有治疗效果:4 周后(精神疾病自我污名量表/SSMIS 刻板印象认同:d=0.86,95%置信区间 0.46 至 1.25;刻板印象应用:d=0.60,95%置信区间 0.22 至 0.99)和 4 个月后(d=0.52,95%置信区间 0.12 至 0.92;d=0.50,95%置信区间 0.10 至 0.90)IG 自我污名化的得分明显低于 CG。IT 显示总费用和 QALY 两组之间没有显著差异。对于每增加一个 QALY 愿意支付 0 欧元的意愿支付,成本效益的概率为 81%,但随着意愿支付的增加而降低。

结论

Sanadak 在减轻叙利亚难民轻度至中度创伤后应激方面并不比对照组更有效,也不太可能具有成本效益。因此,Sanadak 不适合作为独立的治疗方法。然而,由于应用程序的可用性非常好,没有发现任何危害,并且耻辱感明显减轻,因此 Sanadak 在分阶段和协作护理方法中作为桥梁辅助手段具有潜力。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处 DRKS00013782;https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00013782.

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR2-10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/10c446117449/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/1db5613fccbf/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/416da5c6ac0c/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/2b042caa77b5/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/b1fb47867946/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/10c446117449/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/1db5613fccbf/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/416da5c6ac0c/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/2b042caa77b5/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/b1fb47867946/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edfc/7935251/10c446117449/mhealth_v9i1e24807_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
A Self-Help App for Syrian Refugees With Posttraumatic Stress (Sanadak): Randomized Controlled Trial.一款针对有创伤后应激障碍的叙利亚难民的自助应用程序(Sanadak):随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 13;9(1):e24807. doi: 10.2196/24807.
2
HELP@APP: development and evaluation of a self-help app for traumatized Syrian refugees in Germany - a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.帮助@应用程序:为在德国的创伤后叙利亚难民开发和评估自助应用程序 - 一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y.
3
Recruitment and Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the "Sanadak" Trial: A Self-Help App for Syrian Refugees with Post-traumatic Stress.“Sanadak”试验参与者的招募和基线特征:一款针对有创伤后应激的叙利亚难民的自助应用程序。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 18;17(20):7578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207578.
4
Predictors of psychological distress in Syrian refugees with posttraumatic stress in Germany.德国 PTSD 叙利亚难民心理困扰的预测因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0254406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254406. eCollection 2021.
5
Health Care Services Utilization and Health-Related Quality of Life of Syrian Refugees with Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms in Germany (the Sanadak Trial).德国创伤后应激症状的叙利亚难民的卫生保健服务利用情况和与健康相关的生活质量(Sanadak 试验)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3408. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073408.
6
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial: peer-to-peer Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) for adult Syrian refugees in Turkey.一项随机对照试验方案:在土耳其为成年叙利亚难民实施同伴支持的团体问题管理加护(PM+)。
Trials. 2020 Mar 20;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4166-x.
7
Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.《自我指导的数字心理健康自助干预对在埃及的叙利亚难民的影响:一项实用随机对照试验》
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 9;21(9):e1004460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004460. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
[Strategies to Recruit Refugees for Intervention Studies: Lessons Learned from the "Sanadak" Trial].[招募难民参与干预研究的策略:从“萨纳达克”试验中吸取的经验教训]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 Dec;69(12):484-489. doi: 10.1055/a-1030-4570. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
9
Feasibility and Acceptability Study of a Culturally Adapted Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Suicidal Ideation for Syrian Asylum Seekers and Refugees in the United Kingdom: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.一项基于网络的文化适应性干预措施减少在英国的叙利亚寻求庇护者和难民自杀意念的可行性和可接受性研究:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 2;13:e56957. doi: 10.2196/56957.
10
Mental Health Self-Stigma of Syrian Refugees With Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: Investigating Sociodemographic and Psychopathological Correlates.有创伤后应激症状的叙利亚难民的心理健康自我污名化:探究社会人口学和心理病理学相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;12:642618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642618. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost-Effectiveness of Digitally Supported Mental Well-Being Prevention and Promotion Targeting Nonclinical Adult Populations: Systematic Review.针对非临床成年人群体的数字支持心理健康预防与促进的成本效益:系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Aug 11;12:e72458. doi: 10.2196/72458.
2
An Overview on Methods, Evidence, and Study Quality of Health Economic Evaluation Studies for Independently Usable Digital Health Apps: Rapid Review.独立可用数字健康应用程序健康经济评估研究的方法、证据与研究质量概述:快速综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 19;27:e68349. doi: 10.2196/68349.
3
Stabilization interventions in the treatment of traumatized refugees: A scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic evaluations and cost analyses in posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.创伤后应激障碍的经济评估与成本分析:一项系统综述
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 May 29;11(1):1753940. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1753940.
2
Recruitment and Baseline Characteristics of Participants in the "Sanadak" Trial: A Self-Help App for Syrian Refugees with Post-traumatic Stress.“Sanadak”试验参与者的招募和基线特征:一款针对有创伤后应激的叙利亚难民的自助应用程序。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 18;17(20):7578. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207578.
3
Cost-effectiveness of psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults.
创伤难民治疗中的稳定化干预措施:一项范围综述。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Jun 23;12:e73. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10028. eCollection 2025.
4
An investigation into telemedicine utilization for refugee mental health: a systematic review.难民心理健康远程医疗应用的调查:一项系统综述。
Global Health. 2025 May 26;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01119-2.
5
Smartphone apps for mental health: systematic review of the literature and five recommendations for clinical translation.用于心理健康的智能手机应用程序:文献系统综述及临床转化的五项建议。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 11;15(2):e093932. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093932.
6
Cultural adaptation of a self-help app for grieving Syrian refugees in Switzerland. A feasibility and acceptability pilot-RCT.瑞士针对叙利亚难民哀伤问题的一款自助应用程序的文化适应性调整。一项可行性和可接受性试点随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jan 18;39:100800. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100800. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials of mental health apps.心理健康应用程序临床试验中不良事件的系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 18;7(1):363. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01388-y.
8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for PTSD, depression, and anxiety in asylum seekers, refugees, and other migrant populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies.心理社会干预措施对寻求庇护者、难民及其他移民群体创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症和焦虑症的比较疗效及可接受性:一项随机对照研究的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Nov 29;48:101152. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101152. eCollection 2025 Jan.
9
Implementing a stabilizing intervention for traumatized refugees in temporary accommodations in South-West Germany - a randomized controlled pilot trial.在德国西南部为临时住所中的受创伤难民实施稳定干预措施——一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 31;15:1453957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1453957. eCollection 2024.
10
Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.《自我指导的数字心理健康自助干预对在埃及的叙利亚难民的影响:一项实用随机对照试验》
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 9;21(9):e1004460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004460. eCollection 2024 Sep.
成人创伤后应激障碍心理治疗的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0232245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232245. eCollection 2020.
4
Efficacy of Self-Management Smartphone-Based Apps for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于智能手机的自我管理应用程序对创伤后应激障碍症状的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jan 24;14:3. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00003. eCollection 2020.
5
'Help for trauma from the app stores?' A systematic review and standardised rating of apps for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).“应用商店能为创伤提供帮助吗?” 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)应用程序的系统评价与标准化评级
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Jan 9;11(1):1701788. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1701788. eCollection 2020.
6
Syrian refugees in Germany: Perspectives on mental health and coping strategies.在德叙利亚难民:心理健康与应对策略透视。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Feb;129:109906. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109906. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
7
[Strategies to Recruit Refugees for Intervention Studies: Lessons Learned from the "Sanadak" Trial].[招募难民参与干预研究的策略:从“萨纳达克”试验中吸取的经验教训]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 Dec;69(12):484-489. doi: 10.1055/a-1030-4570. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
8
Family Separation and the Impact of Digital Technology on the Mental Health of Refugee Families in the United States: Qualitative Study.家庭分离与数字技术对美国难民家庭心理健康的影响:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Sep 3;21(9):e14171. doi: 10.2196/14171.
9
A Mobile and Web-Based Self-Directed Complementary and Integrative Health Program for Veterans and Their Partners (Mission Reconnect): Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对退伍军人及其伴侣的基于移动设备和网络的自我导向补充与综合健康计划(使命重连):混合方法随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 May 13;8(5):e13666. doi: 10.2196/13666.
10
HELP@APP: development and evaluation of a self-help app for traumatized Syrian refugees in Germany - a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.帮助@应用程序:为在德国的创伤后叙利亚难民开发和评估自助应用程序 - 一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2110-y.