Suppr超能文献

在接受异基因干细胞移植的患者中,噻替派 10mg/kg 治疗方案优于噻替派 5mg/kg 在 TBF 预处理中的作用。

Thiotepa 10 mg/kg Treatment Regimen Is Superior to Thiotepa 5 mg/kg in TBF Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation.

机构信息

Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Bone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 May;18(5):368-374. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The optimal intensity of myeloablation with a reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen to decrease relapse rate after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation without increasing transplant-related mortality (TRM) has not been well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared outcomes between 5 mg/kg (T5) and 10 mg/kg (T10) thiotepa-based conditioning regimens in 29 adults who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 11 months, TRM was 0% and 14% at 100 days and 1 year, respectively, with TRM observed only in the T5 group (P = .016). The relapse incidence at 1 year was 20%. No patient had disease in first complete remission at the time of transplantation. At 1 year, progression-free and overall survival were 30% versus 87% (P = .012) and 46% versus 87% (P = .008) in the T5 and T10 groups, respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, only age at transplantation and total dose of thiotepa had a significant impact on TRM, overall, and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients deemed fit to receive T10-based conditioning for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation to treat high-risk hematologic malignancies had better overall and progression-free survival than those who received T5 with no additional toxicities. Patients should be stratified before conditioning, and those judged fit should receive T10, while the others should consider alternative reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

摘要

简介

为降低异体造血干细胞移植后复发率而降低强度的减毒预处理方案,同时不增加移植相关死亡率(TRM),但其最佳的骨髓清除强度尚未明确。

材料与方法

我们比较了 29 例接受异基因造血干细胞移植治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者中,接受 5mg/kg(T5 组)和 10mg/kg(T10 组)塞替派预处理方案的结果。

结果

中位随访 11 个月后,100 天和 1 年的 TRM 分别为 0%和 14%,仅在 T5 组观察到 TRM(P=.016)。1 年的复发率为 20%。无患者在移植时处于首次完全缓解。1 年时,T5 组和 T10 组的无进展生存率和总生存率分别为 30%和 87%(P=.012)和 46%和 87%(P=.008)。在单因素和多因素分析中,只有移植时的年龄和塞替派的总剂量对 TRM、总生存率和无进展生存率有显著影响。

结论

适合接受 T10 预处理方案进行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗高危血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者,其总生存率和无进展生存率均优于接受 T5 预处理方案且无额外毒性的患者。患者应在预处理前进行分层,适合的患者应接受 T10 治疗,而其他患者应考虑替代的减强度预处理方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验