School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan 2308, NSW, Australia.
Cancer Council NSW, Dowling Street, Woolloomooloo 2011, NSW, Australia.
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
There remains a need to identify effective smoking cessation interventions in severely disadvantaged populations. This trial aimed to examine the effectiveness of an intervention (Call it Quits) developed to promote smoking cessation and delivered by community social service case-workers.
Call it Quits was a pragmatic, parallel randomised trial of a case-worker delivered smoking cessation intervention conducted in a non-government community social service organisation in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Adult smokers requiring financial assistance were randomly assigned to the five-session Call it Quits intervention or usual care control group. Of the 618 eligible individuals, 300 were randomised to the intervention group, of whom 187 (62%) consented and 318 were randomised to the control group, of whom 244 (77%) consented, resulting in 431 participants. The primary outcome measure was self-reported continuous abstinence up to 6-month follow-up with biochemical verification. Primary analysis was performed using all the available data from participants under the assumption the data is missing completely at random, followed by sensitivity analyses.
No statistically significant differences in the primary outcome were found (1.4% in the control group versus 1.0% in the intervention group, OR = 0.77, p = 0.828).
A multi-component smoking cessation intervention delivering motivational interviewing-based counselling and free NRT by a trained case-worker within a community social service setting was not effective at achieving abstinence in a highly disadvantaged sample of smokers but increased attempts to stop and led to a reduction in number of cigarettes smoked daily.
仍需在弱势群体中确定有效的戒烟干预措施。本试验旨在检验一种干预措施(称为“戒烟”)的有效性,该干预措施旨在促进戒烟,由社区社会服务工作者实施。
“戒烟”是一项在澳大利亚新南威尔士州(新州)非政府社区社会服务组织中进行的、具有实际意义的、平行的、随机对照试验,对由社区社会服务工作者实施的戒烟干预措施进行评估。需要经济援助的成年吸烟者被随机分配到五节“戒烟”干预组或常规护理对照组。在 618 名符合条件的个体中,300 名被随机分配到干预组,其中 187 名(62%)同意,318 名被随机分配到对照组,其中 244 名(77%)同意,最终有 431 名参与者。主要结局测量指标为在 6 个月随访期间自我报告的持续戒烟情况,同时进行生物化学验证。主要分析是基于所有可用数据进行的,假设数据是完全随机缺失的,然后进行敏感性分析。
主要结局无统计学差异(对照组为 1.4%,干预组为 1.0%,OR=0.77,p=0.828)。
在一个高度弱势的吸烟者样本中,由经过培训的社区社会服务工作者提供基于动机访谈的咨询和免费尼古丁替代疗法的多成分戒烟干预措施,并不能有效地实现戒烟,但增加了戒烟尝试,并导致每日吸烟量减少。