College of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, PR China; Engineering Research Center of Modern Preparation Technology of TCM of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, PR China.
College of Chinese Materia Medica, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, PR China.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul 1;119:147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.04.001. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
This study aimed to develop novel co-processed tablet fillers based on the principle of particle engineering for direct compaction and to compare the characteristics of co-processed products obtained by fluid-bed coating and co-spray drying, respectively. Water-soluble mannitol and water-insoluble calcium carbonate were selected as representative fillers for this study. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), serving as a surface property modifier, was distributed on the surface of primary filler particles via the two co-processing methods. Both fundamental and functional properties of the products were comparatively investigated. The results showed that functional properties of the fillers, like flowability, compactibility, and drug-loading capacity, were effectively improved by both co-processing methods. However, fluid-bed coating showed greater advantages over co-spray drying in some aspects, which was mainly attributed to the remarkable differences in some fundamental properties of co-processed powders, like particle size, surface topology, and particle structure. For example, the more irregular surface and porous structure induced by fluid-bed coating could contribute to better compaction properties and lower lubricant sensitivity due to the increasing contact area and mechanical interlocking between particles under pressure. More effective surface distribution of HPMC during fluid-bed coating was also a contributor. In addition, such a porous agglomerate structure could also reduce the separation of drug and excipients after mixing, resulting in the improvement in drug loading capacity and tablet uniformity. In summary, fluid-bed coating appears to be more promising for co-processing than spray drying in some aspects, and co-processed excipients produced by it have a great prospect for further investigations and development.
本研究旨在基于颗粒工程原理开发新型共处理片剂填充剂,用于直接压片,并分别比较流化床包衣和共喷雾干燥获得的共处理产物的特性。水溶性甘露醇和水不溶性碳酸钙被选为该研究的代表性填充剂。羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)作为表面性质改性剂,通过两种共处理方法分布在初级填充剂颗粒的表面上。对产品的基础和功能特性进行了比较研究。结果表明,两种共处理方法均可有效改善填充剂的流动性、可压缩性和载药量等功能特性。然而,流化床包衣在某些方面显示出比共喷雾干燥更大的优势,这主要归因于共处理粉末的某些基础性质的显著差异,如粒径、表面拓扑和颗粒结构。例如,流化床包衣引起的更不规则的表面和多孔结构可归因于颗粒之间接触面积的增加和压力下的机械联锁,从而改善可压缩性和降低润滑剂敏感性。流化床包衣过程中 HPMC 的更有效表面分布也是一个贡献因素。此外,这种多孔团聚结构还可以减少药物和赋形剂混合后的分离,从而提高载药量和片剂均匀性。总之,在某些方面,流化床包衣似乎比喷雾干燥更适合共处理,并且由其生产的共处理赋形剂具有进一步研究和开发的广阔前景。