Seliem Wael, Sultan Amira M
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de El Mansura, El Mansura, Egipto; Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Infantil Universitario de El Mansura, El Mansura, Egipto.
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de El Mansura, El Mansura, Egipto; Departamento de Microbiología Clínica e Inmunología, Hospital Infantil Universitario de El Mansura, El Mansura, Egipto.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2019 Jan;90(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
The aim of our study is to evaluate whether the use of heliox (79:21) delivered through a low flow nasal cannula would improve respiratory distress in infants with acute bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus.
We have conducted a prospective randomized controlled study. All patients fulfilled inclusion criteria were randomized to either heliox (79:21) or air via NC at 2 L/min for a continuous 24hours. Measurements were taken at baseline, after 2hours and at the end of the 24hours.
We have included 104 patients into our study. The MCA-S did not show any significant difference between the two groups after 2hours 4.3 vs. 4.1 (P =.78), or at 24hours after 4.2 vs. 4.3 (P =.89). No difference was found in the proportion of participants progressed to MV, n-CPAP or oxygen via nasal cannula (RR 1.0, 0.86 and 0.89) (P= 1.0, .77 and .73). There was no notable reduction in length of treatment in Heliox group 2.42 days vs. 2.79 days in air group P =.65. The in oxygen saturation, PaO, and PaCO did not to have any statistical difference between the two studied groups after 2hours and 24hours of treatment.
Our data showed absence of any beneficial effect of heliox in a concentration (79:21) delivered through low flow nasal cannula in terms of respiratory distress improvement in infants with RSV acute bronchiolitis.
我们研究的目的是评估通过低流量鼻导管输送氦氧混合气(79:21)是否能改善呼吸道合胞病毒引起的急性细支气管炎婴儿的呼吸窘迫。
我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。所有符合纳入标准的患者被随机分为氦氧混合气(79:21)组或空气组,通过鼻导管以2L/min的流量持续给予24小时。在基线、2小时后和24小时结束时进行测量。
我们的研究纳入了104名患者。两组在2小时后(4.3对4.1,P = 0.78)或24小时后(4.2对4.3,P = 0.89)的改良儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征评分(MCA-S)均无显著差异。在进展为机械通气、无创持续气道正压通气或经鼻导管吸氧的参与者比例方面未发现差异(相对危险度分别为1.0、0.86和0.89)(P = 1.0、0.77和0.73)。氦氧混合气组的治疗时间无明显缩短(2.42天对空气组的2.79天,P = 0.65)。治疗2小时和24小时后,两组在血氧饱和度、动脉血氧分压和动脉血二氧化碳分压方面均无统计学差异。
我们的数据表明,对于呼吸道合胞病毒急性细支气管炎婴儿,通过低流量鼻导管输送浓度为79:21的氦氧混合气在改善呼吸窘迫方面没有任何有益效果。