Suppr超能文献

氦氧治疗毛细支气管炎:III 期多中心双盲随机对照试验。

Heliox therapy in bronchiolitis: phase III multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Wright Fleming Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2013 Apr;131(4):661-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1317. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy in bronchiolitis. Earlier studies suggest that helium-oxygen therapy may be beneficial, but evidence is limited. We aimed to compare efficacy of 2 treatment gases, Heliox and Airox (21% oxygen + 79% helium or nitrogen, respectively), on length of hospital treatment for bronchiolitis.

METHODS

This was a multicenter randomized blinded controlled trial of 319 bronchiolitic infant subjects randomly assigned to either gas; 281 subjects completed the study (140 Heliox, 141 Airox), whose data was analyzed. Treatment was delivered via facemask (nasal cannula, if the facemask intolerant) ± continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Severe bronchiolitics received CPAP from the start. Primary end point was length of treatment (LoT) required to alleviate hypoxia and respiratory distress. Secondary end-points were proportion of subjects needing CPAP; CPAP (LoT); and change in respiratory distress score.

RESULTS

Analysis by intention to treat (all subjects); median LoT (inter-quartile range, days): Heliox 1.90 (1.08-3.17), Airox 1.87 (1.11-3.34), P = .41. Facemask tolerant subgroup: Heliox 1.46 (0.85-1.95), Airox 2.01 (0.93-2.86), P = .03. Nasal cannula subgroup: Heliox 2.51 (1.21-4.32), Airox 2.81 (1.45-4.78), P = .53. Subgroup started on CPAP: Heliox 1.55 (1.38-2.01), Airox 2.26 (1.84-2.73), P = .02. Proportion of subjects needing CPAP: Heliox 17%, Airox 19%, O.R. 0.87 (0.47-1.60), P = .76. Heliox reduced respiratory distress score after 8 hours (mixed models estimate, -0.1298; P < .001). The effect was greater for facemask compared with nasal cannula (mixed models estimate, 0.093; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Heliox therapy does not reduce LoT unless given via a tight-fitting facemask or CPAP. Nasal cannula heliox therapy is ineffective.

摘要

背景与目的

支持性治疗仍然是毛细支气管炎治疗的主要方法。早期研究表明,氦氧治疗可能有益,但证据有限。我们旨在比较两种治疗气体(Heliox 和 Airox,分别为 21%氧气+79%氦气和氮气)对毛细支气管炎患儿住院治疗时间的疗效。

方法

这是一项多中心随机双盲对照试验,纳入 319 例毛细支气管炎患儿,随机分为两组气体;281 例患儿完成了研究(Heliox 组 140 例,Airox 组 141 例),对其数据进行了分析。治疗通过面罩(不耐受面罩时使用鼻导管)+持续气道正压通气(CPAP)进行。严重毛细支气管炎患儿从开始就接受 CPAP。主要终点是缓解缺氧和呼吸窘迫所需的治疗时间(LoT)。次要终点是需要 CPAP 的患者比例;CPAP(LoT);呼吸窘迫评分的变化。

结果

根据意向治疗(所有患者)进行分析;中位数 LoT(四分位间距,天):Heliox 组 1.90(1.08-3.17),Airox 组 1.87(1.11-3.34),P=0.41。面罩耐受亚组:Heliox 组 1.46(0.85-1.95),Airox 组 1.93(0.93-2.86),P=0.03。鼻导管亚组:Heliox 组 2.51(1.21-4.32),Airox 组 2.81(1.45-4.78),P=0.53。开始 CPAP 亚组:Heliox 组 1.55(1.38-2.01),Airox 组 1.86(1.84-2.73),P=0.02。需要 CPAP 的患者比例:Heliox 组 17%,Airox 组 19%,O.R.0.87(0.47-1.60),P=0.76。Heliox 治疗后 8 小时呼吸窘迫评分降低(混合模型估计,-0.1298;P<0.001)。与鼻导管相比,面罩的效果更大(混合模型估计,0.093;P=0.04)。

结论

除非通过紧密贴合的面罩或 CPAP 给予 Heliox 治疗,否则不会缩短 LoT。鼻导管 Heliox 治疗无效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验