Suppr超能文献

在接受艾维雷韦/考比司他/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺治疗 144 周的 HIV-1 初治患者中罕见出现耐药性。

Rare emergence of drug resistance in HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients receiving elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for 144 weeks.

机构信息

Gilead Sciences, Inc., 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA, 94404, USA.

Gilead Sciences, Inc., 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA, 94404, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2018 Jun;103:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The single tablet regimen (STR) composed of elvitegravir (E), cobicistat (C), emtricitabine (F), and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) (E/C/F/TAF) was compared to the STR composed of E, C, F, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (E/C/F/TDF) in 2 phase 3 studies in 1733 HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve adults. Superior efficacy of E/C/F/TAF compared to E/C/F/TDF was demonstrated at Week 144 with 84% treatment success compared to 80%, respectively, along with significantly better outcomes of bone and renal safety.

OBJECTIVES

Analyze the emergence of HIV-1 resistance in treatment-naïve adults receiving E/C/F/TAF for 144 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an integrated resistance analysis of the 2 Phase 3 studies, comprising pretreatment HIV-1 sequencing for all participants (N = 1733) and post-baseline HIV-1 resistance analysis for participants with virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL).

RESULTS

Primary resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed pre-treatment in 7.4% (NRTI-RAMs), 18.1% (NNRTI-RAMs), and 3.3% (PI-RAMs) of enrolled subjects. Baseline HIV-1 subtype or pre-existing RAMs did not affect E/C/F/TAF treatment response at week 144. Virologic failure resistance analyses were conducted for 28/866 (3.2%) and 30/867 (3.5%) patients in the E/C/F/TAF and E/C/F/TDF arms, respectively. Over the 3-year study, the rate of resistance emergence remained low at 1.4% in each group (12/866 in E/C/F/TAF; 12/867 in E/C/F/TDF). Resistant virus emerged in 24 patients who developed resistance to antiretrovirals in the regimens (E/C/F/TAF: M184V/I [1.3%], INSTI-RAMs [0.9%], K65R/N [0.2%]; E/C/F/TDF: M184V/I [1.0%], INSTI-RAMs [0.9%], K65R/N [0.5%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance emergence was rare (1.4%) with similar patterns of emergent mutations in both groups. M184V/I was the most prevalent RAM (1.2% overall).

摘要

背景

在两项共纳入 1733 例初治 HIV-1 感染者的 3 期临床试验中,比较了艾维雷韦(elvitegravir,E)、考比司他(cobicistat,C)、恩曲他滨(emtricitabine,F)和丙酚替诺福韦(taf)(E/C/F/TAF)组成的单片方案(STR)与 E、C、F 和替诺福韦二吡呋酯(tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,TDF)(E/C/F/TDF)组成的 STR。第 144 周时,E/C/F/TAF 组的治疗成功率为 84%,显著高于 E/C/F/TDF 组的 80%,表明 E/C/F/TAF 具有更高的疗效,同时骨骼和肾脏安全性结局也显著改善。

目的

分析初治的 HIV-1 感染者接受 E/C/F/TAF 治疗 144 周时的耐药情况。

研究设计

我们对两项 3 期临床试验进行了整合耐药分析,共纳入了所有参与者(N=1733)的治疗前 HIV-1 测序和病毒学失败(HIV-1 RNA≥400 拷贝/ml)参与者的基线后 HIV-1 耐药分析。

结果

治疗前,分别有 7.4%(NRTI-RAMs)、18.1%(NNRTI-RAMs)和 3.3%(PI-RAMs)的入组患者存在原发性耐药相关突变(RAMs)。基线 HIV-1 亚型或预先存在的 RAMs 对第 144 周时的 E/C/F/TAF 治疗反应没有影响。E/C/F/TAF 和 E/C/F/TDF 组分别有 28/866(3.2%)和 30/867(3.5%)名患者进行了病毒学失败耐药分析。在 3 年的研究期间,两组的耐药发生率均较低,分别为 1.4%(E/C/F/TAF 组:12/866;E/C/F/TDF 组:12/867)。在接受抗病毒药物治疗的患者中,有 24 例出现耐药性,耐药病毒株中分别有 1.3%(E/C/F/TAF 组:M184V/I;INSTI-RAMs)和 0.9%(E/C/F/TDF 组:M184V/I;INSTI-RAMs)出现 M184V/I 突变,0.2%(E/C/F/TAF 组:K65R/N)和 0.5%(E/C/F/TDF 组:K65R/N)出现 K65R/N 突变。

结论

两组耐药发生率均较低(1.4%),且耐药突变模式相似。M184V/I 是最常见的 RAM(总体发生率为 1.2%)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验