Margot Nicolas A, Kitrinos Kathryn M, Fordyce Marshall, McCallister Scott, Miller Michael D, Callebaut Christian
a Gilead Sciences Inc. , 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City , CA , 94404 , USA.
HIV Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;17(2):78-87. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1142731.
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), a novel prodrug of the NtRTI tenofovir (TFV), delivers TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) to target cells more efficiently than the current prodrug, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), with a 90% reduction in TFV plasma exposure. TAF, within the fixed dose combination of elvitegravir /cobicistat / emtricitabine (FTC)/TAF (E/C/F/TAF), has been evaluated in one Phase 2 and two Phase 3 randomized, double-blinded studies in HIV-infected treatment-naive patients, comparing E/C/F/TAF to E/C/F/TDF. In these studies, the TAF-containing group demonstrated non-inferior efficacy to the TDF-containing comparator group with 91.9% of E/C/F/TAF patients having <50 copies/mL of HIV-1 RNA at week 48. An integrated resistance analysis across these three studies was conducted, including HIV-1 genotypic analysis at screening, and genotypic/phenotypic analysis for patients with HIV-1 RNA>400 copies/mL at virologic failure. Pre-existing primary resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) were observed at screening among the 1903 randomized and treated patients: 7.5% had NRTI-RAMs, 18.2% had NNRTI-RAMs, and 3.4% had primary PI-RAMs. Pre-treatment RAMs did not influence treatment response at Week 48. In the E/C/F/TAF group, resistance development was rare; seven patients (0.7%, 7/978) developed NRTI-RAMs, five of whom (0.5%, 5/978) also developed primary INSTI-RAMs. In the E/C/F/TDF group, resistance development was also rare; seven patients (0.8%, 7/925) developed NRTI-RAMs, four of whom (0.4%, 4/925) also developed primary INSTI-RAMs. An additional analysis by deep sequencing in virologic failures revealed minimal differences compared to population sequencing. Overall, resistance development was rare in E/C/F/TAF-treated patients, and the pattern of emergent mutations was similar to E/C/F/TDF.
替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)是核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂替诺福韦(TFV)的新型前体药物,与目前的前体药物替诺福韦酯富马酸盐(TDF)相比,能更有效地将替诺福韦二磷酸酯(TFV-DP)递送至靶细胞,同时使TFV的血浆暴露量降低90%。在一项2期和两项3期随机双盲研究中,对初治HIV感染患者使用整合酶抑制剂/考比司他/恩曲他滨(FTC)/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(E/C/F/TAF)的固定剂量组合进行了评估,并与E/C/F/TDF进行比较。在这些研究中,含TAF组显示出与含TDF的对照非劣效,在第48周时,91.9%的E/C/F/TAF患者HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/mL。对这三项研究进行了综合耐药性分析,包括筛查时的HIV-1基因分型分析,以及病毒学失败时HIV-1 RNA>400拷贝/mL患者的基因分型/表型分析。在1903例随机分组并接受治疗的患者中,筛查时观察到了预先存在的主要耐药相关突变(RAMs):7.5%有核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂-RAMs,18.2%有非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂-RAMs,3.4%有主要蛋白酶抑制剂-RAMs。治疗前的RAMs不影响第48周的治疗反应。在E/C/F/TAF组中,耐药的发生很罕见;7例患者(0.7%,7/978)出现核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂-RAMs,其中5例(0.5%,5/978)还出现了主要整合酶抑制剂-RAMs。在E/C/F/TDF组中,耐药的发生也很罕见;7例患者(0.8%,7/925)出现核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂-RAMs,其中4例(0.4%,4/925)还出现了主要整合酶抑制剂-RAMs。对病毒学失败患者进行的深度测序额外分析显示,与群体测序相比差异极小。总体而言,接受E/C/F/TAF治疗的患者耐药发生罕见,且出现的突变模式与E/C/F/TDF相似。