• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证荷兰急诊科入院预测工具。

Development and validation of an admission prediction tool for emergency departments in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Clinical Research Department, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2018 Aug;35(8):464-470. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206673. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1136/emermed-2017-206673
PMID:29627769
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Early prediction of admission has the potential to reduce length of stay in the ED. The aim of this study is to create a computerised tool to predict admission probability.

METHODS

The prediction rule was derived from data on all patients who visited the ED of the Rijnstate Hospital over two random weeks. Performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis factors associated with hospitalisation were explored. Using these data, a model was developed to predict admission probability. Prospective validation was performed at Rijnstate Hospital and in two regional hospitals with different baseline admission rates. The model was converted into a computerised tool that reported the admission probability for any patient at the time of triage.

RESULTS

Data from 1261 visits were included in the derivation of the rule. Four contributing factors for admission that could be determined at triage were identified: age, triage category, arrival mode and main symptom. Prospective validation showed that this model reliably predicts hospital admission in two community hospitals (area under the curve (AUC) 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) and in an academic hospital (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80). In the community hospitals, using a cut-off of 80% for admission probability resulted in the highest number of true positives (actual admissions) with the greatest specificity (positive predictive value (PPV): 89.6, 95% CI 84.5 to 93.6; negative predictive value (NPV): 70.3, 95% CI 67.6 to 72.9). For the academic hospital, with a higher admission rate, a 90% probability was a better cut-off (PPV: 83.0, 95% CI 73.8 to 90.0; NPV: 59.3, 95% CI 54.2 to 64.2).

CONCLUSION

Admission probability for ED patients can be calculated using a prediction tool. Further research must show whether using this tool can improve patient flow in the ED.

摘要

目的

提前预测患者是否需要住院可以减少急诊的住院时间。本研究的目的是创建一个可以预测住院概率的计算机工具。

方法

从随机抽取的两周内到 Rijnstate 医院急诊科就诊的所有患者的数据中推导出预测规则。使用多元逻辑回归分析探索与住院相关的因素。利用这些数据,开发了一个预测住院概率的模型。在 Rijnstate 医院和两家具有不同基线住院率的地区医院进行了前瞻性验证。该模型被转化为一个计算机工具,可以在分诊时报告任何患者的住院概率。

结果

该规则的推导纳入了 1261 次就诊的数据。确定了 4 个可在分诊时确定的入院因素:年龄、分诊类别、到达方式和主要症状。前瞻性验证表明,该模型可以可靠地预测两家社区医院(曲线下面积(AUC)0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.85 至 0.89)和一家学术医院(AUC 0.76,95%CI 0.72 至 0.80)的住院情况。在社区医院中,使用 80%的住院概率作为切点可以获得最多的真阳性(实际住院)和最大的特异性(阳性预测值(PPV):89.6,95%CI 84.5 至 93.6;阴性预测值(NPV):70.3,95%CI 67.6 至 72.9)。对于学术医院,由于住院率较高,90%的概率是更好的切点(PPV:83.0,95%CI 73.8 至 90.0;NPV:59.3,95%CI 54.2 至 64.2)。

结论

可以使用预测工具计算急诊科患者的住院概率。进一步的研究必须表明,使用该工具是否可以改善急诊科的患者流量。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of an admission prediction tool for emergency departments in the Netherlands.开发和验证荷兰急诊科入院预测工具。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Aug;35(8):464-470. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206673. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Early prediction of hospital admission for emergency department patients: a comparison between patients younger or older than 70 years.急诊科患者住院的早期预测:年龄小于或大于 70 岁的患者之间的比较。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jan;35(1):18-27. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-205846. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
3
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
4
The Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START) to predict Emergency Department Disposition: A derivation and internal validation study using retrospective state-wide data from New South Wales, Australia.用于预测急诊科处置情况的悉尼分诊至入院风险工具(START):一项使用澳大利亚新南威尔士州全州范围回顾性数据的推导与内部验证研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0111-4.
5
Predicting emergency department inpatient admissions to improve same-day patient flow.预测急诊科住院人数以改善当日患者流量。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1045-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01435.x.
6
Predicting hospital admission at the emergency department triage: A novel prediction model.预测急诊科分诊中的住院:一种新的预测模型。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1498-1504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.060. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
Extending the Sydney Triage to Admission Risk Tool (START+) to predict discharges and short stay admissions.将悉尼分诊至入院风险工具(START+)扩展,以预测出院和短期住院入院。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Aug;35(8):471-476. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207227. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
Validation of pediatric early warning score in pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊室中儿童早期预警评分的验证
Pediatr Int. 2015 Aug;57(4):694-8. doi: 10.1111/ped.12595. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
9
Predictive variables of an emergency department quality and performance indicator: a 1-year prospective, observational, cohort study evaluating hospital and emergency census variables and emergency department time interval measurements.预测急诊质量和绩效指标的变量:一项为期 1 年的前瞻性、观察性队列研究,评估医院和急诊人数变量以及急诊部门时间间隔测量。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Aug;30(8):638-45. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201404. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
10
The emergency department prediction of disposition (EPOD) study.急诊科处置预测(EPOD)研究
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2014 Nov;17(4):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2014.07.003. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing Crowding in Emergency Departments With Early Prediction of Hospital Admission of Adult Patients Using Biomarkers Collected at Triage: Retrospective Cohort Study.利用分诊时收集的生物标志物对成年患者入院进行早期预测以减少急诊科拥挤情况:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 13;3(1):e38845. doi: 10.2196/38845.
2
Benchmarking emergency department prediction models with machine learning and public electronic health records.利用机器学习和公共电子健康记录对急诊科预测模型进行基准测试。
Sci Data. 2022 Oct 27;9(1):658. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01782-9.
3
Use of Artificial Intelligence to Manage Patient Flow in Emergency Department during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective, Single-Center Study.
利用人工智能管理 COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科的患者流量:一项前瞻性、单中心研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159667.
4
Development of a low-dimensional model to predict admissions from triage at a pediatric emergency department.开发一种低维模型以预测儿科急诊科分诊后的住院情况。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jul 15;3(4):e12779. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12779. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation.利用大规模电子健康记录和可解释机器学习进行急诊科临床决策:系统开发与验证方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 25;11(3):e34201. doi: 10.2196/34201.
6
Predicting inhospital admission at the emergency department: a systematic review.预测急诊科住院:系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Mar;39(3):191-198. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210902. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Models Predicting Hospital Admission of Adult Patients Utilizing Prehospital Data: Systematic Review Using PROBAST and CHARMS.利用院前数据预测成年患者住院情况的模型:采用PROBAST和CHAMRS的系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):e30022. doi: 10.2196/30022.
8
Predicting Admissions From a Paediatric Emergency Department - Protocol for Developing and Validating a Low-Dimensional Machine Learning Prediction Model.预测儿科急诊科的入院情况——开发和验证低维机器学习预测模型的方案
Front Big Data. 2021 Apr 16;4:643558. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2021.643558. eCollection 2021.
9
Institution-Specific Machine Learning Models for Prehospital Assessment to Predict Hospital Admission: Prediction Model Development Study.用于院前评估以预测住院情况的特定机构机器学习模型:预测模型开发研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 27;8(10):e20324. doi: 10.2196/20324.
10
Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE): Development, electronic health record integration and prospective validation of hospital mortality, 180-day mortality and 30-day readmission risk prediction models.临床分析预测引擎 (CAPE):开发、电子健康记录集成以及对医院死亡率、180 天死亡率和 30 天再入院风险预测模型的前瞻性验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238065. eCollection 2020.