New England Veterans Engineering Resource Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;19(9):E1045-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01435.x.
The objectives were to evaluate three models that use information gathered during triage to predict, in real time, the number of emergency department (ED) patients who subsequently will be admitted to a hospital inpatient unit (IU) and to introduce a new methodology for implementing these predictions in the hospital setting.
Three simple methods were compared for predicting hospital admission at ED triage: expert opinion, naïve Bayes conditional probability, and a generalized linear regression model with a logit link function (logit-linear). Two months of data were gathered from the Boston VA Healthcare System's 13-bed ED, which receives approximately 1,100 patients per month. Triage nurses were asked to estimate the likelihood that each of 767 triaged patients from that 2-month period would be admitted after their ED treatment, by placing them into one of six categories ranging from low to high likelihood. Logit-linear regression and naïve Bayes models also were developed using retrospective data and used to estimate admission probabilities for each patient who entered the ED within a 2-month time frame, during triage hours (1,160 patients). Predictors considered included patient age, primary complaint, provider, designation (ED or fast track), arrival mode, and urgency level (emergency severity index assigned at triage).
Of the three methods considered, logit-linear regression performed the best in predicting total bed need, with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.887, an R(2) of 0.58, an average estimation error of 0.19 beds per day, and on average roughly 3.5 hours before peak demand occurred. Significant predictors were patient age, primary complaint, bed type designation, and arrival mode (p < 0.0001 for all factors). The naïve Bayesian model had similar positive predictive value, with an AUC of 0.841 and an R(2) of 0.58, but with average difference in total bed need of approximately 2.08 per day. Triage nurse expert opinion also had some predictive capability, with an R(2) of 0.52 and an average difference in total bed need of 1.87 per day.
Simple probability models can reasonably predict ED-to-IU patient volumes based on basic data gathered at triage. This predictive information could be used for improved real-time bed management, patient flow, and discharge processes. Both statistical models were reasonably accurate, using only a minimal number of readily available independent variables.
本研究旨在评估三种模型,这些模型利用分诊时收集的信息实时预测随后将被收入急诊病房(ED)的患者数量,并介绍一种在医院环境中实施这些预测的新方法。
比较了三种用于预测 ED 分诊时住院的简单方法:专家意见、朴素贝叶斯条件概率和具有对数链接函数的广义线性回归模型(对数线性)。从波士顿退伍军人事务医疗系统的 13 张病床的 ED 采集了两个月的数据,该 ED 每月接收约 1100 名患者。分诊护士被要求评估这两个月期间的 767 名分诊患者中每一位患者在 ED 治疗后被收入的可能性,将他们分为从低到高的六个可能性类别之一。对数线性回归和朴素贝叶斯模型也使用回顾性数据进行开发,并用于估计在两个月的时间范围内在分诊时间(1160 名患者)进入 ED 的每位患者的入院概率。考虑的预测因子包括患者年龄、主要主诉、提供者、指定(ED 或快速通道)、入院方式和紧急程度(分诊时分配的紧急严重程度指数)。
在所考虑的三种方法中,对数线性回归在预测总床位需求方面表现最佳,其接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.887,R²为 0.58,平均估计误差为每天 0.19 张床位,平均在需求高峰发生前约 3.5 小时。显著的预测因子是患者年龄、主要主诉、床位类型指定和入院方式(所有因素的 p<0.0001)。朴素贝叶斯模型具有类似的阳性预测值,AUC 为 0.841,R²为 0.58,但总床位需求的平均差异约为每天 2.08 张。分诊护士的专家意见也具有一定的预测能力,R²为 0.52,总床位需求的平均差异为每天 1.87 张。
基于分诊时收集的基本数据,简单的概率模型可以合理地预测 ED 到 IU 的患者量。该预测信息可用于改进实时床位管理、患者流程和出院流程。这两种统计模型都具有相当的准确性,仅使用了少量现成的独立变量。