Intensive Care Department, International Medical Research Center, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz, University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):542-553. doi: 10.1177/0885066618767835. Epub 2018 Apr 8.
Invasive candidiasis is not uncommon in critically ill patients but has variable epidemiology and outcomes between intensive care units (ICUs). This study evaluated the epidemiology, characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with invasive candidiasis at 6 ICUs of 2 tertiary care centers.
This was a prospective observational study of all adults admitted to 6 ICUs in 2 different hospitals between August 2012 and May 2016 and diagnosed to have invasive candidiasis by 2 intensivists according to predefined criteria. The epidemiology of isolated and the characteristics, management, and outcomes of affected patients were studied. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of versus infection and hospital mortality.
Invasive candidiasis was diagnosed in 162 (age 58.4 ± 18.9 years, 52.2% males, 82.1% medical admissions, and admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 24.1 ± 8.4) patients at a rate of 2.6 cases per 100 ICU admissions. On the diagnosis day, the Candida score was 2.4 ± 0.9 in invasive candidiasis compared with 1.6 ± 0.9 in colonization ( < .01). The most frequent species were (38.3%), (16.7%), (16%), and (13.6%). In patients with candidemia, antifungal therapy was started on average 1 hour before knowing the culture result (59.6% of therapy initiated after). Resistance to fluconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B occurred in 27.9%, 2.9%, and 3.1%, respectively. The hospital mortality was 58.6% with no difference between and infections (61.3% and 54.9%, respectively; = .44). The independent predictors of mortality were renal replacement therapy after invasive candidiasis diagnosis (odds ratio: 5.42; 95% confidence interval: 2.16-13.56) and invasive candidiasis leading/contributing to ICU admission versus occurring during critical illness (odds ratio: 2.87; 95% confidence interval: 1.22-6.74).
In critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis, was responsible for most cases, and mortality was high (58.6%). Antifungal therapy was initiated after culture results in 60% suggesting low preclinical suspicion. Study registration: NCT01490684; registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on February 11, 2012.
危重症患者中侵袭性念珠菌病并不少见,但不同 ICU 之间的流行病学和结局存在差异。本研究评估了 2 家三级护理中心的 6 个 ICU 中侵袭性念珠菌病患者的流行病学、特征、管理和结局。
这是一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入了 2012 年 8 月至 2016 年 5 月期间在 2 家不同医院的 6 个 ICU 中住院的所有成年人,并根据既定标准由 2 位重症监护医生诊断为侵袭性念珠菌病。研究了分离株的流行病学以及受感染患者的特征、管理和结局。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定 与 感染和医院死亡率的预测因素。
在 162 例(年龄 58.4 ± 18.9 岁,52.2%为男性,82.1%为内科入院,入院急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 评分 24.1 ± 8.4)患者中诊断出侵袭性念珠菌病,其发病率为每 100 例 ICU 入院患者 2.6 例。在诊断日,侵袭性念珠菌病患者的 Candida 评分(2.4 ± 0.9)高于定植患者(1.6 ± 0.9;<.01)。最常见的菌种是 (38.3%)、 (16.7%)、 (16%)和 (13.6%)。在念珠菌血症患者中,平均在获知培养结果前 1 小时开始抗真菌治疗(59.6%的治疗在开始后)。对氟康唑、卡泊芬净和两性霉素 B 的耐药率分别为 27.9%、2.9%和 3.1%。医院死亡率为 58.6%, 与 感染无差异(分别为 61.3%和 54.9%;=.44)。死亡率的独立预测因素是侵袭性念珠菌病诊断后进行肾脏替代治疗(比值比:5.42;95%置信区间:2.16-13.56)以及侵袭性念珠菌病导致/促成 ICU 入院而非发生在危重病期间(比值比:2.87;95%置信区间:1.22-6.74)。
在患有侵袭性念珠菌病的危重症患者中, 是大多数病例的病因,死亡率很高(58.6%)。在 60%的患者中,在获得培养结果后才开始抗真菌治疗,这表明临床前的怀疑度较低。研究注册:NCT01490684;2012 年 2 月 11 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册。