Suppr超能文献

下颌切牙根管形态和牙本质厚度的影像学及显微计算机断层扫描分类

Radiographic and micro-computed tomography classification of root canal morphology and dentin thickness of mandibular incisors.

作者信息

Espir Camila Galleti, Nascimento Camila Almeida, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Bonetti-Filho Idomeo, Tanomaru-Filho Mário

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara Dental School, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;21(1):57-62. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_230_16.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Root canal anatomy is evaluated using different methodologies.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate and classify root canal morphology and dentin thicknesses (DT), comparing radiographic and micro-computed tomography (CT) analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Canal diameter and DT of mandibular incisors ( = 520) were evaluated using digital radiographs in buccolingual (BL) and mesiodistal (MD) directions. The diameter ratio (DR) BL/MD was classified: flattened (FL, DR >4); oval (OV, 2≤ DR ≥4); rounded (RN, 1.1< DR >2); round (RO, 0.9≤ DR ≥1.1); and with BL flatness (BL, DR <0.9). OV ( = 110) were subjected to micro-CT. DT and DR were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 mm. ANOVA, Tukey, and paired Wilcoxon tests ( < 0.05) were used.

RESULTS

Radiographic classification was 23.3% FL, 41.3% OV, 27.3% RN, 4.5% RO, and 3.6% BL. DT was similar. Radiographic DT at 3 and 9 mm was greater than micro-CT ( < 0.05) and was similar at 6 mm ( > 0.05). DR differed between the analyses. Oval canals were predominant at all levels radiographically and at 9 and 6 mm in micro-CT analysis, with greater variation at 3 mm.

CONCLUSION

Oval root canals are predominant in mandibular incisors at 9 mm. Radiographic DT is larger than observed in micro-CT at 3 and 9 mm, and the classification differed in each root level. The classification at 9 mm is indicated.

摘要

背景

采用不同方法评估根管解剖结构。

目的

本研究旨在评估并分类根管形态及牙本质厚度(DT),比较影像学分析与显微计算机断层扫描(CT)分析。

材料与方法

使用数字化根尖片在颊舌(BL)和近远中(MD)方向评估下颌切牙(n = 520)的根管直径和DT。将直径比(DR)BL/MD分类为:扁平(FL,DR>4);椭圆形(OV,2≤DR≤4);圆形(RN,1.1<DR<2);圆形(RO,0.9≤DR≤1.1);以及BL扁平(BL,DR<0.9)。选取OV(n = 110)进行显微CT检查。在3、6和9 mm处评估DT和DR。采用方差分析、Tukey检验和配对Wilcoxon检验(P<0.05)。

结果

影像学分类为23.3% FL、41.3% OV、27.3% RN、4.5% RO和3.6% BL。DT相似。3和9 mm处的影像学DT大于显微CT(P<0.05),6 mm处相似(P>0.05)。两种分析方法的DR不同。椭圆形根管在各层面影像学上均占主导,在显微CT分析中9和6 mm处占主导,3 mm处变异更大。

结论

9 mm处下颌切牙椭圆形根管占主导。3和9 mm处的影像学DT大于显微CT观察结果,且各根管层面的分类不同。建议采用9 mm处的分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea36/5852937/545fa8adddc9/JCD-21-57-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验