Suppr超能文献

帕金森病的诊断标准:从詹姆斯·帕金森到前驱疾病的概念

Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease: From James Parkinson to the Concept of Prodromal Disease.

作者信息

Marsili Luca, Rizzo Giovanni, Colosimo Carlo

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2018 Mar 23;9:156. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00156. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

The diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) is based on clinical features and differently to the common opinion that detecting this condition is easy, seminal clinicopathological studies have shown that up one-fourth of patients diagnosed as PD during life has an alternative diagnosis at postmortem. The misdiagnosis is even higher when only the initial diagnosis is considered, since the diagnostic accuracy improves by time, during follow-up visits. Given that the confirmation of the diagnosis of PD can be only obtained through neuropathology, to improve and facilitate the diagnostic-therapeutic workup in PD, a number of criteria and guidelines have been introduced in the last three decades. In the present paper, we will critically re-appraise the main diagnostic criteria proposed for PD, with particular attention to the recently published criteria by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) task force, underlying their novelty and focusing on the diagnostic issues still open. We also emphasize that the MDS-PD criteria encompass the two main previous sets of diagnostic criteria (United Kingdom PD Society Brain Bank and Gelb's criteria), introducing at the same time new aspects as the use of non-motor symptoms as additional diagnostic features, and the adoption of the concept of prodromal PD, crucial to enroll in clinical trials PD patients in the very early phase of the disease. To better understand the real diffusion of the new MDS-PD diagnostic criteria among neurologists, we have also collected selective opinions of sixteen movement disorder experts from various world regions on their practical approach for the clinical diagnosis of PD. Results from this brief survey showed that, although innovative and complete, the revised diagnostic criteria produced by MDS task force are still scarcely employed among clinicians. We believe that both national and international scientific societies should operate in the future for a broader diffusion of these criteria with specific initiatives, including dedicated events and teaching courses.

摘要

帕金森病(PD)的诊断基于临床特征,与普遍认为的检测这种疾病很容易的观点不同,开创性的临床病理研究表明,生前被诊断为PD的患者中,有多达四分之一在死后有其他诊断。如果只考虑初始诊断,误诊率甚至更高,因为在随访期间,诊断准确性会随着时间提高。鉴于PD的诊断只能通过神经病理学来确认,为了改进和促进PD的诊断治疗工作,在过去三十年中引入了一些标准和指南。在本文中,我们将批判性地重新评估针对PD提出的主要诊断标准,特别关注国际帕金森和运动障碍协会(MDS)工作组最近发布的标准,强调其新颖性并关注仍然存在的诊断问题。我们还强调,MDS-PD标准涵盖了之前两套主要的诊断标准(英国帕金森病协会脑库标准和格尔布标准),同时引入了新的方面,如将非运动症状用作额外的诊断特征,以及采用前驱期PD的概念,这对于在疾病的极早期阶段招募PD患者参加临床试验至关重要。为了更好地了解新的MDS-PD诊断标准在神经科医生中的实际普及情况,我们还收集了来自世界各个地区的16位运动障碍专家对他们临床诊断PD的实际方法的选择性意见。这项简短调查的结果表明,尽管MDS工作组修订后的诊断标准具有创新性和完整性,但在临床医生中仍然很少被采用。我们认为,国家和国际科学协会未来应该通过包括专门活动和教学课程在内的具体举措,来更广泛地推广这些标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1145/5877503/7b456413eb49/fneur-09-00156-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验