• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Umeclidinium-Vilanterol for Protocolized Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation in Hospitalized Patients: A Sequential Period Analysis.茚达特罗格隆溴铵用于住院慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者规范化管理的有效性:序贯阶段分析
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Jan 24;5(1):38-45. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.1.2017.0163.
2
Hospital Admission and Readmission Among US Patients Receiving Umeclidinium/Vilanterol or Tiotropium as Initial Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病初始维持治疗使用乌美溴铵/维兰特罗或噻托溴铵的患者的住院和再入院情况
Pulm Ther. 2021 Jun;7(1):203-219. doi: 10.1007/s41030-021-00151-y. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
3
Long-acting beta2-agonist in addition to tiotropium versus either tiotropium or long-acting beta2-agonist alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.长效β2受体激动剂联合噻托溴铵与单独使用噻托溴铵或长效β2受体激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD008989. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008989.pub3.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium/vilanterol for the management of patients with moderate to very severe COPD using an economic model.使用经济模型对乌美溴铵/维兰特罗治疗中度至非常严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的成本效益分析。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Mar 24;12:997-1008. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S124420. eCollection 2017.
5
Comparison of Effectiveness Using Different Dual Bronchodilator Agents in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment.不同双支气管扩张剂用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗的有效性比较
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 16;10(12):2649. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122649.
6
Comparative Effectiveness of Long-Acting Beta -Agonist Combined with a Long-Acting Muscarinic Antagonist or Inhaled Corticosteroid in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.长效β受体激动剂联合长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂或吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的比较疗效
Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Apr;37(4):447-455. doi: 10.1002/phar.1913.
7
Real-world effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a retrospective cohort study.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)初始维持治疗的真实世界疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Aug 1;14:1721-1737. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S204649. eCollection 2019.
8
Umeclidinium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: latest evidence and place in therapy.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的乌美溴铵:最新证据及在治疗中的地位
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2017 Apr;8(4-5):81-91. doi: 10.1177/2040622317700822. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
9
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol for the Treatment of COPD.乌美溴铵与维兰特罗固定剂量复方治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效和安全性系统评价
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):397-407. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0084.
10
The combination of umeclidinium bromide and vilanterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current evidence and future prospects.乌美溴铵和维兰特罗联合治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病:当前证据和未来前景。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2013 Dec;7(6):311-9. doi: 10.1177/1753465813499789. Epub 2013 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-based review of data on the combination inhaler umeclidinium/vilanterol in patients with COPD.对 COPD 患者联合吸入剂乌美溴铵/维兰特罗数据的循证回顾。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 6;14:1251-1265. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S191845. eCollection 2019.
2
Impact of a Comprehensive COPD Therapeutic Interchange Program on 30-Day Readmission Rates in Hospitalized Patients.一项慢性阻塞性肺疾病综合治疗转换计划对住院患者30天再入院率的影响。
P T. 2019 Apr;44(4):185-191.
3
Treatment strategies after acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Impact on mortality.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的治疗策略:对死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 14;13(12):e0208847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208847. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Dual Bronchodilation With LAMA/LABA for the Treatment of Stable COPD.一项关于长效抗胆碱能药物/长效β2受体激动剂双重支气管扩张治疗稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价与荟萃分析
Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1181-96. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.646. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
2
Combination bronchodilator therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.联合支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病。
Respir Res. 2013 May 8;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-49.
3
Confirmatory spirometry for adults hospitalized with a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation.成人哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重住院患者的确认性肺量测定。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Dec 7;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-73.
4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults--United States, 2011.成年人慢性阻塞性肺疾病——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Nov 23;61(46):938-43.
5
Seasonality and determinants of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations in the TORCH study.TORCH 研究中中重度 COPD 加重的季节性和决定因素。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Jan;39(1):38-45. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00194610. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
6
Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD--a review of potential interventions.COPD 恶化率、健康状况和死亡率——潜在干预措施的综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:203-23. doi: 10.2147/copd.s3385. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, risk factors, and outcome trials: comparisons with cardiovascular disease.
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2006 Sep;3(7):635-40. doi: 10.1513/pats.200603-094SS.
8
Severe acute exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的严重急性加重和死亡率
Thorax. 2005 Nov;60(11):925-31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.040527. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
9
The most expensive medical conditions in America.美国最昂贵的医疗病症。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Jul-Aug;21(4):105-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.105.
10
The costs of treating COPD in the United States.美国慢性阻塞性肺疾病的治疗成本。
Chest. 2001 Feb;119(2):344-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.344.

茚达特罗格隆溴铵用于住院慢性阻塞性肺疾病加重期患者规范化管理的有效性:序贯阶段分析

Effectiveness of Umeclidinium-Vilanterol for Protocolized Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation in Hospitalized Patients: A Sequential Period Analysis.

作者信息

Chapin Todd W, Mann Michael A, Brown Gary L, Leitheiser Traci L, Anderson Becky, Leedahl David D

机构信息

1-Pharmacy Services, Sanford Health, Fargo, North Dakota.

2-North Dakota State University College of Health Professions, Fargo.

出版信息

Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2018 Jan 24;5(1):38-45. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.5.1.2017.0163.

DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.5.1.2017.0163
PMID:29629403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5870738/
Abstract

Bronchodilator therapy is a foundation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation treatment. Although international guidelines recommend short-acting formulations given multiple times per day, long-acting formulations have not been adequately evaluated. The objective of our study was to determine the effectiveness of umeclidinium-vilanterol (UME/VIL), long-acting beta2-agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LABA/LAMA) as a once-daily alternative for treating COPD exacerbations in hospitalized patients. In this retrospective sequential period analysis, we reviewed electronic medical records of patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations before (September 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016) and after (April 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016) incorporation of UME/VIL into our standard COPD protocol. Before implementation, patients received a daily anticholinergic plus twice-daily long-acting beta2-agonist therapy (tiotropium plus formoterol, n=65). After implementation, UME/VIL replaced the previous regimen (n=58). No other changes were made to the COPD protocol. The primary outcome was 30-day hospital readmission rate. Hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and cost of care were analyzed as secondary outcomes. A trend toward increased 30-day readmission rates in the post-intervention group (24.1% versus 10.8%, =0.049) was no longer statistically significant after adjustment for severity of illness (based on case-mix index) and complications or comorbidities based on diagnosis-related group codes (adjusted odds ratio: 2.499; 95% confidence interval: 0.916-7.380; =0.074). After adjustment for potential confounders,the implementation of a LABA/LAMA combination product was not statistically associated with an increased 30-day readmission rate but was associated with lower cost of care.

摘要

支气管扩张剂治疗是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重期治疗的基础。尽管国际指南推荐每日多次给予短效制剂,但长效制剂尚未得到充分评估。我们研究的目的是确定乌美溴铵-维兰特罗(UME/VIL),一种长效β2受体激动剂/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LABA/LAMA)作为每日一次治疗住院COPD急性加重期的替代药物的有效性。在这项回顾性序贯时期分析中,我们回顾了在将UME/VIL纳入我们的标准COPD治疗方案之前(2015年9月1日至2016年2月29日)和之后(2016年4月1日至2016年9月30日)因COPD急性加重期住院患者的电子病历。在实施之前,患者接受每日一次抗胆碱能药物加每日两次长效β2受体激动剂治疗(噻托溴铵加福莫特罗,n = 65)。实施后,UME/VIL取代了先前的治疗方案(n = 58)。COPD治疗方案没有其他改变。主要结局是30天再入院率。住院时间、30天死亡率和护理费用作为次要结局进行分析。干预后组30天再入院率有增加趋势(24.1%对10.8%,P = 0.049),但在根据疾病严重程度(基于病例组合指数)和基于诊断相关组编码的并发症或合并症进行调整后,不再具有统计学意义(调整后的优势比:2.499;95%置信区间:0.916 - 7.380;P = 0.074)。在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,LABA/LAMA联合产品的实施与30天再入院率增加无统计学关联,但与较低的护理费用相关。