Murray D W, Parkinson R W
Botnar Research Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
Arrowe Park Hospital, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Orthopaedics, Arrowe Park Road, Upton, Wirral CH49 5PE, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2018 Apr 1;100-B(4):432-435. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2017-0716.R1.
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has numerous advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and one disadvantage, the higher revision rate. The best way to minimize the revision rate is for surgeons to use UKA for at least 20% of their knee arthroplasties. To achieve this, they need to learn and apply the appropriate indications and techniques. This would decrease the revision rate and increase the number of UKAs which were implanted, which would save money and patients would benefit from improved outcomes over their lifetime. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:432-5.
单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)与全膝关节置换术(TKA)相比有诸多优势,但也有一个缺点,即翻修率较高。将翻修率降至最低的最佳方法是外科医生在至少20%的膝关节置换手术中使用UKA。要做到这一点,他们需要学习并应用适当的适应症和技术。这将降低翻修率,增加UKA的植入数量,既能节省费用,患者也能在其一生中受益于改善的治疗效果。引用本文:《骨与关节杂志》2018年;100 - B:432 - 5。