• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨垂直截骨误差对胫骨近端的生物力学影响及截骨平面改善的研究

An investigation into the biomechanical effects of tibial vertical cutting errors on the proximal tibia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the improvement of cutting planes.

作者信息

Ou Deyan, Deng Gaoyong, Qin Gaosheng, Ye Yongqing, Pan Jingwei, Huang Yu, Kuang Haisheng, Tang Shilin, Mo Yongxin, Pan Shixin

机构信息

Department of Limb and Joint Ward, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi Province, China.

Department of Spine Ward, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical College, Guilin, Guangxi Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 9;26(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08630-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-025-08630-y
PMID:40346562
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12063333/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has shown significant clinical effectiveness in treating medial compartment knee degeneration, but postoperative periprosthetic fractures and persistent pain remain common and challenging complications. Tibial vertical cutting errors are considered an important factor influencing postoperative biomechanics. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical effects of tibial vertical cutting errors(referring to the deviation between the actual vertical cutting plane and the ideal vertical resection plane during UKA)on the proximal tibia after UKA and to reduce the risk of fractures and improve postoperative outcomes through surface modification designs (chamfering and filleting).

METHODS

In this study, a three-dimensional model of the tibia was constructed from CT and MRI data of a 26-year-old male volunteer. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate different vertical cutting errors (1 mm, 3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm, and 9 mm). The study included models with varying cutting errors and two surface modification designs. During the simulation, stress and strain distribution on the proximal tibia were analyzed to assess the impact of cutting errors on the risk of periprosthetic fractures. Additionally, the fracture risk was quantified using the Risk of Fracture(ROF) index, and statistical data analysis and comparison were performed.

RESULTS

The results showed that as the vertical cutting error increased, the equivalent stress and fracture risk value beneath the tibial prosthesis significantly increased. Notably, in the 5-9 mm cutting error models, the fracture risk was markedly higher. The chamfering and rounding designs effectively reduced stress concentration beneath the tibial prosthesis, lowering the stress peaks and significantly decreasing the fracture risk. In the ROF calculation, when the vertical cutting error exceeded 5 mm, the ROF value significantly exceeded the critical value, indicating a substantial increase in fracture risk. Compared to the standard osteotomy method, both surface modification designs effectively reduced the fracture risk.

CONCLUSION

Tibial vertical cutting error is a significant risk factor for periprosthetic fractures and pain after UKA. The greater the vertical cutting error, the faster the fracture risk and bone degeneration progress. Specifically, when the vertical cutting error exceeds 5 mm, the fracture risk increases significantly. The surface modification design proposed in this study effectively mitigates the negative biomechanical effects of cutting errors on the tibia and reduces the risk of postoperative complications. Future research should further explore the impact of other factors, such as osteoporosis, activity level, and muscle strength, on UKA outcomes, and incorporate advanced surgical navigation technologies to improve surgical precision and reduce errors.

摘要

目的

单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)在治疗膝关节内侧间室退变方面已显示出显著的临床疗效,但术后假体周围骨折和持续性疼痛仍然是常见且具有挑战性的并发症。胫骨垂直截骨误差被认为是影响术后生物力学的一个重要因素。本研究旨在探讨胫骨垂直截骨误差(指UKA手术过程中实际垂直截骨平面与理想垂直截骨平面之间的偏差)对UKA术后胫骨近端的生物力学影响,并通过表面改性设计(倒角和倒圆角)降低骨折风险,改善术后效果。

方法

在本研究中,根据一名26岁男性志愿者的CT和MRI数据构建了胫骨的三维模型。采用有限元分析(FEA)模拟不同的垂直截骨误差(1毫米、3毫米、5毫米、7毫米和9毫米)。该研究包括具有不同截骨误差的模型以及两种表面改性设计。在模拟过程中,分析胫骨近端的应力和应变分布,以评估截骨误差对假体周围骨折风险的影响。此外,使用骨折风险(ROF)指数对骨折风险进行量化,并进行统计数据分析和比较。

结果

结果表明,随着垂直截骨误差的增加,胫骨假体下方的等效应力和骨折风险值显著增加。值得注意的是,在截骨误差为5 - 9毫米的模型中,骨折风险明显更高。倒角和倒圆角设计有效地降低了胫骨假体下方的应力集中,降低了应力峰值,并显著降低了骨折风险。在ROF计算中,当垂直截骨误差超过5毫米时,ROF值显著超过临界值,表明骨折风险大幅增加。与标准截骨方法相比,两种表面改性设计均有效地降低了骨折风险。

结论

胫骨垂直截骨误差是UKA术后假体周围骨折和疼痛的重要危险因素。垂直截骨误差越大,骨折风险和骨质退变进展越快。具体而言,当垂直截骨误差超过5毫米时,骨折风险显著增加。本研究提出的表面改性设计有效地减轻了截骨误差对胫骨的负面生物力学影响,并降低了术后并发症的风险。未来的研究应进一步探讨骨质疏松、活动水平和肌肉力量等其他因素对UKA手术效果的影响,并引入先进的手术导航技术以提高手术精度,减少误差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/b70026dd4ad2/12891_2025_8630_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/c208fd40ba43/12891_2025_8630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/c2b29cadc5fc/12891_2025_8630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/844e50904749/12891_2025_8630_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/557371d1d272/12891_2025_8630_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/82058b6d9c85/12891_2025_8630_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/92ad9ea9a8f6/12891_2025_8630_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/9eaaa78d5943/12891_2025_8630_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/b70026dd4ad2/12891_2025_8630_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/c208fd40ba43/12891_2025_8630_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/c2b29cadc5fc/12891_2025_8630_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/844e50904749/12891_2025_8630_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/557371d1d272/12891_2025_8630_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/82058b6d9c85/12891_2025_8630_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/92ad9ea9a8f6/12891_2025_8630_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/9eaaa78d5943/12891_2025_8630_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f2b/12063333/b70026dd4ad2/12891_2025_8630_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation into the biomechanical effects of tibial vertical cutting errors on the proximal tibia after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the improvement of cutting planes.单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨垂直截骨误差对胫骨近端的生物力学影响及截骨平面改善的研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 May 9;26(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08630-y.
2
Tibial cutting guide (resector) holding pins position and subsequent risks of periprosthetic fracture in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a finite element analysis study.胫骨截骨导向器(骨锯)固定销的位置与单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的后续风险:有限元分析研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02308-6.
3
Impact of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment on Knee Joint Biomechanics Following Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.固定平台单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨组件冠状面对线对膝关节生物力学的影响:有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1423-1429. doi: 10.1111/os.12927. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
[Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic fracture after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].[内侧单髁膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的诊断与治疗]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):635-640. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211111-00527.
5
How does the inclination of the tibial component matter? A three-dimensional finite element analysis of medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty.胫骨组件的倾斜度为何重要?内侧活动平台单髁关节置换术的三维有限元分析。
Knee. 2018 Jun;25(3):434-444. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
6
Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures.在牛津单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)中,胫骨组件的尺寸选择不当会增加假体周围骨折的风险。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1353-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05142-z. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Cementless, Cruciate-Retaining Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Conventional Instrumentation: Technical Pearls and Intraoperative Considerations.使用传统器械的非骨水泥型、保留交叉韧带初次全膝关节置换术:技术要点与术中注意事项
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024 Sep 13;14(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00036. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
8
Twice cutting method reduces tibial cutting error in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.两次截骨法减少单髁膝关节置换术中胫骨截骨误差。
Knee. 2016 Jan;23(1):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.015. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
9
Rotational alignment errors can occur in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty if anatomical landmarks are misused: A preoperative CT scan analysis.如果解剖标志使用不当,单髁膝关节置换术中可能会出现旋转对线误差:术前CT扫描分析。
Knee. 2020 Jan;27(1):242-248. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Finite-Element Analysis of Stress on the Proximal Tibia After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨近端应力的有限元分析
J Nippon Med Sch. 2020 Dec 14;87(5):260-267. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2020_87-504. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical effects of femoral prosthesis misalignment on the structure of the lateral compartment during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in osteoporotic patients.骨质疏松症患者行单髁膝关节置换术时股骨假体对线不良对外侧间室结构的生物力学影响。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2024 May-Aug;32(2):10225536241273924. doi: 10.1177/10225536241273924.
2
Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.等待单髁膝关节置换术患者的骨质疏松患病率:一项横断面研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Sep 11;14:1224890. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1224890. eCollection 2023.
3
Functional scores and prosthetic implant placement are different for navigated medial UKA left in varus alignment.
在导航内侧 UKA 中,内翻对线时功能评分和假体植入位置不同。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Sep;31(9):3919-3926. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07388-x. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
4
The risk of tibial eminence avulsion fracture with bi-unicondylar knee arthroplasty : a finite element analysis.双髁膝关节置换术中胫骨髁间隆起撕脱骨折的风险:有限元分析
Bone Joint Res. 2022 Aug;11(8):575-584. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.118.BJR-2021-0533.R1.
5
Tibio-Femoral Contact Force Distribution of Knee Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Finite Element and Gait Analysis.全膝关节置换前后膝关节胫股接触力分布:有限元与步态分析的联合研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1836-1845. doi: 10.1111/os.13361. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
6
Are there functional biomechanical differences in robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized controlled trial.与传统全膝关节置换相比,机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换在功能生物力学方面是否存在差异?一项前瞻性、随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Apr;104-B(4):433-443. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B4.BJJ-2021-0837.R1.
7
Biomechanical effects of fixed-bearing femoral prostheses with different coronal positions in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.固定平台股骨假体在膝关节单髁置换术中不同冠状位对线的生物力学影响
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 9;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03037-0.
8
Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.骨折固定的有限元分析。
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2021 Aug;19(4):403-416. doi: 10.1007/s11914-021-00690-y. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
9
Impact of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment on Knee Joint Biomechanics Following Fixed-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.固定平台单髁膝关节置换术后胫骨组件冠状面对线对膝关节生物力学的影响:有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jun;13(4):1423-1429. doi: 10.1111/os.12927. Epub 2021 May 20.
10
Improved sizing with image-based robotic-assisted system compared to image-free and conventional techniques in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.与无影像和传统技术相比,基于影像的机器人辅助系统在膝关节单髁置换术中可实现更好的假体尺寸选择。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Apr;103-B(4):610-618. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1453.R1.