Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;46(7):1139-1149. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003149.
It is uncertain whether dedicated neurocritical care units are associated with improved outcomes for critically ill neurologically injured patients in the era of collaborative protocol-driven care. We examined the association between dedicated neurocritical care units and mortality and the effects of standardized management protocols for severe traumatic brain injury.
We surveyed trauma medical directors from centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program to obtain information about ICU structure and processes of care. Survey data were then linked to the Trauma Quality Improvement Program registry, and random-intercept hierarchical multivariable modeling was used to evaluate the association between dedicated neurocritical care units, the presence of standardized management protocols and mortality.
Trauma centers in North America participating in Trauma Quality Improvement Program.
Data were analyzed from 9,773 adult patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury admitted to 134 Trauma Quality Improvement Program centers between 2011 and 2013.
None.
Only 50 ICUs (37%) were dedicated neurocritical care units, whereas 84 (63%) were general ICUs. Rates of standardized management protocols were similar comparing dedicated neurocritical care units and general ICUs. Among severe TBI patients admitted to trauma centers enrolled in Trauma Quality Improvement Program, care in a dedicated neurocritical care unit did not improve risk-adjusted in-hospital survival (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19; p = 0.79). However, the presence of a standardized management protocol for these patients was associated with lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93; p = 0.009).
Compared with dedicated neurocritical care models, standardized management protocols for severe traumatic brain injured patients are process-targeted intervention strategies that may improve clinical outcomes.
在协作式协议驱动型治疗时代,专门的神经重症监护病房是否与危重神经损伤患者的预后改善相关尚不确定。我们研究了专门的神经重症监护病房与死亡率之间的关系,以及严重创伤性脑损伤的标准化管理方案的效果。
我们调查了参加美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划的创伤医学主任,以获取有关 ICU 结构和护理流程的信息。然后将调查数据与创伤质量改进计划登记处相关联,并使用随机截距分层多变量模型来评估专门的神经重症监护病房、标准化管理方案的存在与死亡率之间的关系。
参与创伤质量改进计划的北美创伤中心。
分析了 2011 年至 2013 年期间,134 个创伤质量改进计划中心收治的 9773 例孤立性严重创伤性脑损伤成年患者的数据。
无。
只有 50 个 ICU(37%)是专门的神经重症监护病房,而 84 个(63%)是普通 ICU。比较专门的神经重症监护病房和普通 ICU,标准化管理方案的实施率相似。在参加创伤质量改进计划的创伤中心收治的严重 TBI 患者中,在专门的神经重症监护病房接受治疗并不能提高风险调整后的院内生存率(比值比,0.97;95%置信区间,0.80-1.19;p=0.79)。然而,这些患者存在标准化管理方案与较低的风险调整后院内死亡率相关(比值比,0.77;95%置信区间,0.63-0.93;p=0.009)。
与专门的神经重症监护模式相比,严重创伤性脑损伤患者的标准化管理方案是针对流程的干预策略,可能改善临床结局。