Salvian A J, Baker J D
Vascular Surgery Sections, Sepulveda, VA Medical Center, CA.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1988 Jan-Feb;29(1):37-41.
The changes in common femoral vein flow produced by three different intermittent pneumatic compression devices were recorded with a Doppler velocity detector in 20 normal legs and 20 with postphlebitic syndrome. Mean and peak velocity increases were measured and expressed as a percent of resting baseline values. There was no significant difference in the peak velocity increase produced by the three devices in normals and abnormals; however, there were differences in the mean velocity increases. The devices worked as well on postphlebitic legs as on normal ones. Correct cuff application was more critical than indicated by the manufacturers, suggesting that some of the failures of intermittent pneumatic compression may have resulted from improper cuff placement. The results show that different designs of intermittent pneumatic compression equipment accelerate venous flow in the leg.
用多普勒速度探测器记录了20条正常腿和20条患有静脉炎后综合征的腿在使用三种不同的间歇性气动压迫装置时股总静脉血流的变化。测量了平均速度和峰值速度的增加,并表示为静息基线值的百分比。在正常人和异常者中,三种装置产生的峰值速度增加没有显著差异;然而,平均速度增加存在差异。这些装置在患有静脉炎后的腿上和正常腿上的效果一样好。正确的袖带应用比制造商指出的更为关键,这表明间歇性气动压迫的一些失败可能是由于袖带放置不当造成的。结果表明,不同设计的间歇性气动压迫设备可加速腿部静脉血流。