Fujiwara Yuki, Miyadera Takayuki, Kuhara Eriko, Kobayashi Juichi
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2017 Feb;88(1):11-20. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.88.15042.
The effects of two introductory styles on substantive information provided by Japanese children were investigated. Children aged 5–6 years (n = 42) and 7–8 years (n = 40) took a simulated physical examination. One week later, the participants were interviewed about the examination in a narrative introductory condition using open-ended questions, or a non-narrative introductory condition using directive and yes/no questions. Substantive information provided by the children in the two conditions was compared. Results indicated that in the narrative condition, the participants provided more accurate information about the examination in response to open-ended questions. Additionally, the 7–8 year-old children in the narrative condition provided a wider range of critical information. These findings suggest that an open-ended introductory style is effective in eliciting more accurate information from children, including preschoolers, and more varied information from school-age children.
研究了两种介绍方式对日本儿童提供的实质性信息的影响。5至6岁(n = 42)和7至8岁(n = 40)的儿童接受了模拟体检。一周后,参与者在叙事性介绍条件下使用开放式问题接受关于体检的访谈,或在非叙事性介绍条件下使用指导性问题和是/否问题接受访谈。比较了两种条件下儿童提供的实质性信息。结果表明,在叙事性条件下,参与者针对开放式问题提供了关于体检的更准确信息。此外,叙事性条件下7至8岁的儿童提供了更广泛的关键信息。这些发现表明,开放式介绍方式在从儿童(包括学龄前儿童)那里获取更准确信息以及从学龄儿童那里获取更多样化信息方面是有效的。