Bearman Madeleine, Westerveld Marleen, Brubacher Sonja P, Powell Martine
Centre for Investigative Interviewing, Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Griffith Institute for Educational Research, School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Aug 12;29(2):241-255. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1904453. eCollection 2022.
This study examines how adults with limited expressive language (with average sentences of five words or less) respond to open-ended questions. Participants ( = 49) completed a baseline measure and were then interviewed about a personal experience using exclusively open-ended questions, followed by open-ended and directive questions about a staged event. Their interviews were coded for mean length of utterance (MLU), number of different words and six dimensions of the Narrative Assessment Profile. Descriptively, the participants were able to give some event-related detail in their narratives, but there was wide variability in narrative quality. Correlational and regression analyses indicate that their MLU was stable across contexts. The findings suggest that adults with limited expressive language can provide informative responses to open-ended questions about their experiences, and that their expressive language is likely to show stability across introductory and substantive interview phases.
本研究考察了表达性语言有限(平均句子长度为五个单词或更少)的成年人如何回答开放式问题。49名参与者完成了一项基线测量,然后使用完全开放式问题就个人经历接受访谈,接着就一个虚构事件接受开放式和指导性问题的访谈。对他们的访谈进行编码,以计算话语平均长度(MLU)、不同单词的数量以及叙事评估概况的六个维度。从描述性角度来看,参与者能够在叙事中提供一些与事件相关的细节,但叙事质量存在很大差异。相关性和回归分析表明,他们的MLU在不同情境下是稳定的。研究结果表明,表达性语言有限的成年人能够就其经历对开放式问题提供丰富的回答,并且他们的表达性语言在访谈的介绍阶段和实质性阶段可能表现出稳定性。