Tasaki Katsuya, Shin Jiwon
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2017 Apr;88(1):32-42. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.88.15065.
This study attempts to identify response styles of Japanese students by cross-level and cross-national analyses. Tasaki and Ninomiya (2013) demonstrated the existence of an acquiescence response behavior of Japanese students based on the model by Billet and McClendon(2000), who measured latent response characteristics as “style factor.” In this study, we used a different response style measurement model proposed by Weijters, Schillewaert, & Geuens (2008) positing that response styles are psychological constructs and observed response style variables are summary indicators derived from sets of various, but independent, test items. Results of cross-national analyses indicated that Japanese and Korean participants were more likely to choose a mid-point response (MRS) and less likely to choose an acquiescence response (ARS) than American counterparts, but no significant difference was observed for an extreme response (ERS) among participants from the three nations. Within the Japanese response style model, cross-level analyses showed that ARS scores were significantly higher than ERS scores, indicating that Japanese participants had an acquiescence response style, consistent with the findings from Tasaki & Ninomiya (2013).
本研究试图通过跨层次和跨国分析来识别日本学生的反应方式。田崎和二宫(2013年)基于比利特和麦克伦登(2000年)的模型,证明了日本学生存在默认反应行为,该模型将潜在反应特征测量为“风格因素”。在本研究中,我们使用了韦伊特斯、席勒瓦尔特和格恩斯(2008年)提出的不同反应方式测量模型,该模型假定反应方式是心理结构,观察到的反应方式变量是从各种但独立的测试项目集中得出的汇总指标。跨国分析结果表明,与美国参与者相比,日本和韩国参与者更倾向于选择中点反应(MRS),而不太可能选择默认反应(ARS),但在这三个国家的参与者中,极端反应(ERS)没有显著差异。在日本反应方式模型中,跨层次分析表明,ARS得分显著高于ERS得分,这表明日本参与者具有默认反应方式,这与田崎和二宫(2013年)的研究结果一致。