Suppr超能文献

[日本应答偏差:应答方式的跨层次和跨国比较]

[Japanese response bias: Cross-level and cross-national comparisons on response styles].

作者信息

Tasaki Katsuya, Shin Jiwon

出版信息

Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2017 Apr;88(1):32-42. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.88.15065.

Abstract

This study attempts to identify response styles of Japanese students by cross-level and cross-national analyses. Tasaki and Ninomiya (2013) demonstrated the existence of an acquiescence response behavior of Japanese students based on the model by Billet and McClendon(2000), who measured latent response characteristics as “style factor.” In this study, we used a different response style measurement model proposed by Weijters, Schillewaert, & Geuens (2008) positing that response styles are psychological constructs and observed response style variables are summary indicators derived from sets of various, but independent, test items. Results of cross-national analyses indicated that Japanese and Korean participants were more likely to choose a mid-point response (MRS) and less likely to choose an acquiescence response (ARS) than American counterparts, but no significant difference was observed for an extreme response (ERS) among participants from the three nations. Within the Japanese response style model, cross-level analyses showed that ARS scores were significantly higher than ERS scores, indicating that Japanese participants had an acquiescence response style, consistent with the findings from Tasaki & Ninomiya (2013).

摘要

本研究试图通过跨层次和跨国分析来识别日本学生的反应方式。田崎和二宫(2013年)基于比利特和麦克伦登(2000年)的模型,证明了日本学生存在默认反应行为,该模型将潜在反应特征测量为“风格因素”。在本研究中,我们使用了韦伊特斯、席勒瓦尔特和格恩斯(2008年)提出的不同反应方式测量模型,该模型假定反应方式是心理结构,观察到的反应方式变量是从各种但独立的测试项目集中得出的汇总指标。跨国分析结果表明,与美国参与者相比,日本和韩国参与者更倾向于选择中点反应(MRS),而不太可能选择默认反应(ARS),但在这三个国家的参与者中,极端反应(ERS)没有显著差异。在日本反应方式模型中,跨层次分析表明,ARS得分显著高于ERS得分,这表明日本参与者具有默认反应方式,这与田崎和二宫(2013年)的研究结果一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验