Suppr超能文献

用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架:三年随访1

Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for patients presenting with non STelevation-acute coronary syndrome: A three-years follow-up1.

作者信息

Anadol Remzi, Dimitriadis Zisis, Polimeni Alberto, Wendling Franziska, Gönner Svenja, Ullrich Helen, Lorenz Liv, Weissner Melissa, Munzel Thomas, Gori Tommaso

机构信息

Kardiologie I, Universitätsmedizin Mainz und DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):3-8. doi: 10.3233/CH-189101.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate three-year outcomes of patients presenting with nonSTelevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) treated with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BRS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included a total of 488 consecutive patients, enrolled between May 2012 and December 2013 (median age 65 [56-74], 392 men. 269 patients presented with either NSTEMI or unstable angina at the time of enrolling, 219 patients with stable or silent angina. The primary device-oriented endpoint (Target Lesion Failure, TLF) was defined as a combination of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.Among the cardiac risk factors, NSTE-ACS patients were more frequently smokers (P = 0.028), had less frequently dyslipidemia (P = 0.003) and a history of prior PCI (P < 0.01).The median follow-up was 1070[763-1197] days. The three-years incidence of TLF was slightly higher but did not differ significantly between groups (NSTE-ACS: 16.3% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.163). Accordingly, there was no difference in any of the other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of NSTE-ACS with BRS appears to be safe and effective. In this group, risk factors for events during follow up did not differ as compared to the general population.

摘要

目的

研究使用生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架(BRS)治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的三年预后。

方法与结果

该研究共纳入488例连续患者,于2012年5月至2013年12月期间入组(中位年龄65岁[56 - 74岁],男性392例)。269例患者在入组时表现为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛,219例患者表现为稳定型或无症状型心绞痛。主要的以器械为导向的终点(靶病变失败,TLF)定义为心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的组合。在心脏危险因素中,NSTE-ACS患者吸烟更频繁(P = 0.028),血脂异常较少见(P = 0.003),且既往有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)史较少(P < 0.01)。中位随访时间为1070天[763 - 1197天]。TLF的三年发生率略高,但两组间无显著差异(NSTE-ACS组:16.3% vs. 15.9%,p = 0.163)。因此,其他任何终点均无差异。

结论

使用BRS治疗NSTE-ACS似乎是安全有效的。在该组中,随访期间事件的危险因素与一般人群相比无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验