• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架:三年随访1

Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for patients presenting with non STelevation-acute coronary syndrome: A three-years follow-up1.

作者信息

Anadol Remzi, Dimitriadis Zisis, Polimeni Alberto, Wendling Franziska, Gönner Svenja, Ullrich Helen, Lorenz Liv, Weissner Melissa, Munzel Thomas, Gori Tommaso

机构信息

Kardiologie I, Universitätsmedizin Mainz und DZHK Standort Rhein-Main, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):3-8. doi: 10.3233/CH-189101.

DOI:10.3233/CH-189101
PMID:29630530
Abstract

AIM

To investigate three-year outcomes of patients presenting with nonSTelevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) treated with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffolds (BRS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included a total of 488 consecutive patients, enrolled between May 2012 and December 2013 (median age 65 [56-74], 392 men. 269 patients presented with either NSTEMI or unstable angina at the time of enrolling, 219 patients with stable or silent angina. The primary device-oriented endpoint (Target Lesion Failure, TLF) was defined as a combination of cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction or clinically driven target lesion revascularization.Among the cardiac risk factors, NSTE-ACS patients were more frequently smokers (P = 0.028), had less frequently dyslipidemia (P = 0.003) and a history of prior PCI (P < 0.01).The median follow-up was 1070[763-1197] days. The three-years incidence of TLF was slightly higher but did not differ significantly between groups (NSTE-ACS: 16.3% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.163). Accordingly, there was no difference in any of the other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of NSTE-ACS with BRS appears to be safe and effective. In this group, risk factors for events during follow up did not differ as compared to the general population.

摘要

目的

研究使用生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架(BRS)治疗的非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的三年预后。

方法与结果

该研究共纳入488例连续患者,于2012年5月至2013年12月期间入组(中位年龄65岁[56 - 74岁],男性392例)。269例患者在入组时表现为非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛,219例患者表现为稳定型或无症状型心绞痛。主要的以器械为导向的终点(靶病变失败,TLF)定义为心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或临床驱动的靶病变血运重建的组合。在心脏危险因素中,NSTE-ACS患者吸烟更频繁(P = 0.028),血脂异常较少见(P = 0.003),且既往有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)史较少(P < 0.01)。中位随访时间为1070天[763 - 1197天]。TLF的三年发生率略高,但两组间无显著差异(NSTE-ACS组:16.3% vs. 15.9%,p = 0.163)。因此,其他任何终点均无差异。

结论

使用BRS治疗NSTE-ACS似乎是安全有效的。在该组中,随访期间事件的危险因素与一般人群相比无差异。

相似文献

1
Bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for patients presenting with non STelevation-acute coronary syndrome: A three-years follow-up1.用于非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱血管支架:三年随访1
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):3-8. doi: 10.3233/CH-189101.
2
Impact of postdilatation on performance of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with everolimus-eluting stents: A propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter "real-world" registry.与依维莫司洗脱支架相比,后扩张对急性冠状动脉综合征患者生物可吸收血管支架性能的影响:一项来自多中心“真实世界”注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析。
Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):374-83. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0052. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
3
1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收支架与依维莫司洗脱支架的1年结局:GHOST-EU和XIENCE V美国注册研究的倾向匹配比较
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Mar 14;9(5):440-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.042. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry.依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架在常规临床实践中的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:欧洲多中心GHOST-EU注册研究的早期和中期结果
EuroIntervention. 2015 Feb;10(10):1144-53. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M07_11.
5
Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死:倾向评分匹配比较的 1 年结果:BVS-EXAMINATION 研究(生物可吸收血管支架——依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt B):189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.005.
6
Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes After Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中依维莫司洗脱生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱金属支架治疗结局的荟萃分析比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;122(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
7
A randomized comparison of novel bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The CENTURY II high risk ACS substudy.新型生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机对照研究:CENTURY II高危急性冠状动脉综合征亚组研究
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):355-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stent for coronary bifurcation lesions.ABSBORB 生物可吸收血管支架与依维莫司洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的中期临床结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.123.
9
Early outcome of magnesium bioresorbable scaffold implantation in acute coronary syndrome-the initial report from the Magmaris-ACS registry.急性冠状动脉综合征中镁生物可吸收支架植入的早期结果- Magmaris-ACS 注册研究的初步报告。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E287-E292. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28036. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.生物可吸收依维莫司洗脱支架与金属依维莫司洗脱支架治疗初发原生冠状动脉病变所致缺血性心脏病的比较(ABSORB II):一项随机对照临床试验的临床和操作次要终点 1 年中期分析。
Lancet. 2015 Jan 3;385(9962):43-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61455-0. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Bioresorbable scaffolds advances, challenges, and future directions.生物可吸收支架的进展、挑战及未来方向。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Apr 22;87(7):4173-4183. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003424. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Effect of Prostanoids on Human Platelet Function: An Overview.前列腺素对人血小板功能的影响:概述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 27;21(23):9020. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239020.
3
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: a meta-analysis.用于经皮治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞的生物可吸收血管支架:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Mar 15;19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1042-2.
4
Clinical results of bioresorbable drug-eluting scaffolds in short and long coronary artery lesions using the PSP technique.应用 PSP 技术治疗短和长冠状动脉病变的生物可吸收药物洗脱支架的临床结果。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0994-y.
5
Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the "PSP" Technique.生物可吸收血管支架血栓形成的手术预测因素:“PSP”技术各组成部分的分析
J Clin Med. 2019 Jan 15;8(1):93. doi: 10.3390/jcm8010093.
6
Bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a step back thinking of the future.生物可吸收血管支架:对未来的逆向思考。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(2):117-119. doi: 10.5114/aic.2018.76401. Epub 2018 Jun 19.