Departments of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States of America.
PLoS Pathog. 2018 Apr 9;14(4):e1006960. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006960. eCollection 2018 Apr.
Protection at the peak of Plasmodium chabaudi blood-stage malaria infection is provided by CD4 T cells. We have shown that an increase in Th1 cells also correlates with protection during the persistent phase of malaria; however, it is unclear how these T cells are maintained. Persistent malaria infection promotes protection and generates both effector T cells (Teff), and effector memory T cells (Tem). We have previously defined new CD4 Teff (IL-7Rα-) subsets from Early (TeffEarly, CD62LhiCD27+) to Late (TeffLate, CD62LloCD27-) activation states. Here, we tested these effector and memory T cell subsets for their ability to survive and protect in vivo. We found that both polyclonal and P. chabaudi Merozoite Surface Protein-1 (MSP-1)-specific B5 TCR transgenic Tem survive better than Teff. Surprisingly, as Tem are associated with antigen persistence, Tem survive well even after clearance of infection. As previously shown during T cell contraction, TeffEarly, which can generate Tem, also survive better than other Teff subsets in uninfected recipients. Two other Tem survival mechanisms identified here are that low-level chronic infection promotes Tem both by driving their proliferation, and by programming production of Tem from Tcm. Protective CD4 T cell phenotypes have not been precisely determined in malaria, or other persistent infections. Therefore, we tested purified memory (Tmem) and Teff subsets in protection from peak pathology and parasitemia in immunocompromised recipient mice. Strikingly, among Tmem (IL-7Rαhi) subsets, only TemLate (CD62LloCD27-) reduced peak parasitemia (19%), though the dominant memory subset is TemEarly, which is not protective. In contrast, all Teff subsets reduced peak parasitemia by more than half, and mature Teff can generate Tem, though less. In summary, we have elucidated four mechanisms of Tem maintenance, and identified two long-lived T cell subsets (TemLate, TeffEarly) that may represent correlates of protection or a target for longer-lived vaccine-induced protection against malaria blood-stages.
在疟原虫血期感染高峰期,CD4 T 细胞提供保护。我们已经表明,Th1 细胞的增加也与疟疾持续期的保护相关;然而,这些 T 细胞是如何维持的还不清楚。持续的疟原虫感染促进了保护,并产生了效应 T 细胞(Teff)和效应记忆 T 细胞(Tem)。我们之前已经从早期(TeffEarly,CD62LhiCD27+)到晚期(TeffLate,CD62LloCD27-)激活状态定义了新的 CD4 Teff(IL-7Rα-)亚群。在这里,我们测试了这些效应器和记忆 T 细胞亚群在体内的存活和保护能力。我们发现,多克隆和 P. chabaudi Merozoite Surface Protein-1(MSP-1)特异性 B5 TCR 转基因 Tem 比 Teff 存活得更好。令人惊讶的是,由于 Tem 与抗原的持续存在有关,即使在感染清除后,Tem 也能很好地存活。如前在 T 细胞收缩期间所示,TeffEarly,其可以产生 Tem,在未感染的受者中也比其他 Teff 亚群存活得更好。这里确定的另外两种 Tem 存活机制是,低水平的慢性感染通过驱动其增殖,并通过编程 Tcm 产生 Tem 来促进 Tem。在疟疾或其他持续性感染中,尚未精确确定保护性 CD4 T 细胞表型。因此,我们在免疫功能低下的受者小鼠中测试了纯化的记忆(Tmem)和 Teff 亚群在峰值病理和寄生虫血症中的保护作用。令人惊讶的是,在 Tmem(IL-7Rαhi)亚群中,只有 TemLate(CD62LloCD27-)降低了峰值寄生虫血症(19%),尽管主要的记忆亚群是 TemEarly,它没有保护作用。相比之下,所有 Teff 亚群都将峰值寄生虫血症降低了一半以上,并且成熟的 Teff 可以产生 Tem,尽管数量较少。总之,我们已经阐明了 Tem 维持的四种机制,并确定了两个长寿 T 细胞亚群(TemLate,TeffEarly),它们可能代表对疟疾血期的保护相关性或更长寿疫苗诱导保护的目标。