Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):78.e1-78.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
Sacral neuromodulation is an effective therapy for overactive bladder, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. Infection after sacral neurostimulation is costly and burdensome. Determining optimal perioperative management strategies to reduce the risk of infection is important to reduce this burden.
We sought to identify risk factors associated with sacral neurostimulator infection requiring explantation, to estimate the incidence of infection requiring explantation, and identify associated microbial pathogens.
This is a multicenter retrospective case-control study of sacral neuromodulation procedures completed from Jan. 1, 2004, through Dec. 31, 2014. We identified all sacral neuromodulation implantable pulse generator implants as well as explants due to infection at 8 participating institutions. Cases were patients who required implantable pulse generator explantation for infection during the review period. Cases were included if age ≥18 years old, follow-up data were available ≥30 days after implantable pulse generator implant, and the implant was performed at the institution performing the explant. Two controls were matched to each case. These controls were the patients who had an implantable pulse generator implanted by the same surgeon immediately preceding and immediately following the identified case who met inclusion criteria. Controls were included if age ≥18 years old, no infection after implantable pulse generator implant, follow-up data were available ≥180 days after implant, and no explant for any reason <180 days from implant. Controls may have had an explant for reasons other than infection at >180 days after implant. Fisher exact test (for categorical variables) and Student t test (for continuous variables) were used to test the strength of the association between infection and patient and surgery characteristics. Significant variables were then considered in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine risk factors independently associated with infection.
Over a 10-year period at 8 academic institutions, 1930 sacral neuromodulator implants were performed by 17 surgeons. In all, 38 cases requiring device explant for infection and 72 corresponding controls were identified. The incidence of infection requiring explant was 1.97%. Hematoma formation (13% cases, 0% controls; P = .004) and pocket depth of ≥3 cm (21% cases, 0% controls; P = .031) were independently associated with an increased risk of infection requiring explant. On multivariable regression analysis controlling for significant variables, both hematoma formation (P = .006) and pocket depth ≥3 cm (P = .020, odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-8.89) remained significantly associated with infection requiring explant. Of the 38 cases requiring explant, 32 had cultures collected and 24 had positive cultures. All 5 cases with a hematoma had a positive culture (100%). Of the 4 cases with a pocket depth ≥3 cm, 2 had positive cultures, 1 had negative cultures, and 1 had a missing culture result. The most common organism identified was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (38%).
Infection after sacral neuromodulation requiring device explant is low. The most common infectious pathogen identified was methicillin-resistant S aureus. Demographic and health characteristics did not predict risk of explant due to infection, however, having a postoperative hematoma or a deep pocket ≥3 cm significantly increased the risk of explant due to infection. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous hemostasis as well as ensuring the pocket depth is <3 cm at the time of device implant.
骶神经调节是治疗膀胱过度活动症、尿潴留和粪便失禁的有效方法。骶神经刺激后感染的代价高昂且带来负担。确定降低感染风险的最佳围手术期管理策略对于减轻这一负担非常重要。
我们旨在确定与需要取出的骶神经刺激器感染相关的危险因素,估计需要取出以治疗感染的发生率,并确定相关的微生物病原体。
这是一项 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间完成的骶神经调节程序的多中心回顾性病例对照研究。我们确定了 8 家参与机构中所有的骶神经刺激可植入脉冲发生器植入物以及因感染而取出的植入物。病例是在审查期间因感染而需要可植入脉冲发生器取出的患者。如果患者年龄≥18 岁,植入可植入脉冲发生器后有≥30 天的随访数据,并且植入是在进行取出的机构进行的,则将患者纳入病例。每例病例匹配 2 例对照。这些对照是在识别病例之前和之后由同一位外科医生立即植入可植入脉冲发生器的患者,如果符合纳入标准,则将患者纳入对照。如果患者年龄≥18 岁,植入可植入脉冲发生器后无感染,随访数据在植入后≥180 天,并且在植入后 180 天内无任何原因导致的取出,则将患者纳入对照。对照可能因植入后 180 天以上的其他原因而取出。使用 Fisher 确切检验(用于分类变量)和 Student t 检验(用于连续变量)来检验感染与患者和手术特征之间的关联强度。然后,将显著变量纳入多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定与感染独立相关的危险因素。
在 8 所学术机构的 10 年期间,由 17 名外科医生进行了 1930 例骶神经调节植入。共确定了 38 例因感染需要设备取出的病例和 72 例相应的对照。需要取出以治疗感染的感染发生率为 1.97%。血肿形成(病例 13%,对照 0%;P=.004)和袋深≥3 cm(病例 21%,对照 0%;P=.031)与需要取出以治疗感染的风险增加独立相关。在控制显著变量的多变量回归分析中,血肿形成(P=.006)和袋深≥3 cm(P=.020,优势比 3.26;95%置信区间,1.20-8.89)仍然与需要取出以治疗感染显著相关。在 38 例需要取出的病例中,有 32 例采集了培养物,24 例培养物阳性。所有 5 例有血肿的病例均有阳性培养物(100%)。在 4 例袋深≥3 cm 的病例中,有 2 例培养物阳性,1 例培养物阴性,1 例培养物结果缺失。最常见的病原体是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(38%)。
骶神经调节后需要取出设备以治疗感染的发生率较低。最常见的感染病原体是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。人口统计学和健康特征不能预测因感染而取出的风险,但是术后有血肿或袋深≥3 cm 显著增加了因感染而取出的风险。这些发现强调了在设备植入时仔细止血以及确保袋深<3 cm 的重要性。