• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶神经调节后因感染而导致的器械取出的风险因素:一项多中心回顾性病例对照研究。

Risk factors for explantation due to infection after sacral neuromodulation: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):78.e1-78.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.005
PMID:29630890
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacral neuromodulation is an effective therapy for overactive bladder, urinary retention, and fecal incontinence. Infection after sacral neurostimulation is costly and burdensome. Determining optimal perioperative management strategies to reduce the risk of infection is important to reduce this burden.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify risk factors associated with sacral neurostimulator infection requiring explantation, to estimate the incidence of infection requiring explantation, and identify associated microbial pathogens.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a multicenter retrospective case-control study of sacral neuromodulation procedures completed from Jan. 1, 2004, through Dec. 31, 2014. We identified all sacral neuromodulation implantable pulse generator implants as well as explants due to infection at 8 participating institutions. Cases were patients who required implantable pulse generator explantation for infection during the review period. Cases were included if age ≥18 years old, follow-up data were available ≥30 days after implantable pulse generator implant, and the implant was performed at the institution performing the explant. Two controls were matched to each case. These controls were the patients who had an implantable pulse generator implanted by the same surgeon immediately preceding and immediately following the identified case who met inclusion criteria. Controls were included if age ≥18 years old, no infection after implantable pulse generator implant, follow-up data were available ≥180 days after implant, and no explant for any reason <180 days from implant. Controls may have had an explant for reasons other than infection at >180 days after implant. Fisher exact test (for categorical variables) and Student t test (for continuous variables) were used to test the strength of the association between infection and patient and surgery characteristics. Significant variables were then considered in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine risk factors independently associated with infection.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year period at 8 academic institutions, 1930 sacral neuromodulator implants were performed by 17 surgeons. In all, 38 cases requiring device explant for infection and 72 corresponding controls were identified. The incidence of infection requiring explant was 1.97%. Hematoma formation (13% cases, 0% controls; P = .004) and pocket depth of ≥3 cm (21% cases, 0% controls; P = .031) were independently associated with an increased risk of infection requiring explant. On multivariable regression analysis controlling for significant variables, both hematoma formation (P = .006) and pocket depth ≥3 cm (P = .020, odds ratio 3.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-8.89) remained significantly associated with infection requiring explant. Of the 38 cases requiring explant, 32 had cultures collected and 24 had positive cultures. All 5 cases with a hematoma had a positive culture (100%). Of the 4 cases with a pocket depth ≥3 cm, 2 had positive cultures, 1 had negative cultures, and 1 had a missing culture result. The most common organism identified was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (38%).

CONCLUSION

Infection after sacral neuromodulation requiring device explant is low. The most common infectious pathogen identified was methicillin-resistant S aureus. Demographic and health characteristics did not predict risk of explant due to infection, however, having a postoperative hematoma or a deep pocket ≥3 cm significantly increased the risk of explant due to infection. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous hemostasis as well as ensuring the pocket depth is <3 cm at the time of device implant.

摘要

背景

骶神经调节是治疗膀胱过度活动症、尿潴留和粪便失禁的有效方法。骶神经刺激后感染的代价高昂且带来负担。确定降低感染风险的最佳围手术期管理策略对于减轻这一负担非常重要。

目的

我们旨在确定与需要取出的骶神经刺激器感染相关的危险因素,估计需要取出以治疗感染的发生率,并确定相关的微生物病原体。

研究设计

这是一项 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日期间完成的骶神经调节程序的多中心回顾性病例对照研究。我们确定了 8 家参与机构中所有的骶神经刺激可植入脉冲发生器植入物以及因感染而取出的植入物。病例是在审查期间因感染而需要可植入脉冲发生器取出的患者。如果患者年龄≥18 岁,植入可植入脉冲发生器后有≥30 天的随访数据,并且植入是在进行取出的机构进行的,则将患者纳入病例。每例病例匹配 2 例对照。这些对照是在识别病例之前和之后由同一位外科医生立即植入可植入脉冲发生器的患者,如果符合纳入标准,则将患者纳入对照。如果患者年龄≥18 岁,植入可植入脉冲发生器后无感染,随访数据在植入后≥180 天,并且在植入后 180 天内无任何原因导致的取出,则将患者纳入对照。对照可能因植入后 180 天以上的其他原因而取出。使用 Fisher 确切检验(用于分类变量)和 Student t 检验(用于连续变量)来检验感染与患者和手术特征之间的关联强度。然后,将显著变量纳入多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定与感染独立相关的危险因素。

结果

在 8 所学术机构的 10 年期间,由 17 名外科医生进行了 1930 例骶神经调节植入。共确定了 38 例因感染需要设备取出的病例和 72 例相应的对照。需要取出以治疗感染的感染发生率为 1.97%。血肿形成(病例 13%,对照 0%;P=.004)和袋深≥3 cm(病例 21%,对照 0%;P=.031)与需要取出以治疗感染的风险增加独立相关。在控制显著变量的多变量回归分析中,血肿形成(P=.006)和袋深≥3 cm(P=.020,优势比 3.26;95%置信区间,1.20-8.89)仍然与需要取出以治疗感染显著相关。在 38 例需要取出的病例中,有 32 例采集了培养物,24 例培养物阳性。所有 5 例有血肿的病例均有阳性培养物(100%)。在 4 例袋深≥3 cm 的病例中,有 2 例培养物阳性,1 例培养物阴性,1 例培养物结果缺失。最常见的病原体是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(38%)。

结论

骶神经调节后需要取出设备以治疗感染的发生率较低。最常见的感染病原体是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。人口统计学和健康特征不能预测因感染而取出的风险,但是术后有血肿或袋深≥3 cm 显著增加了因感染而取出的风险。这些发现强调了在设备植入时仔细止血以及确保袋深<3 cm 的重要性。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for explantation due to infection after sacral neuromodulation: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.骶神经调节后因感染而导致的器械取出的风险因素:一项多中心回顾性病例对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;219(1):78.e1-78.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
2
Neuromodulation and female pelvic disorders.
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Jul;26(4):321-7. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000294.
3
Outcomes in a contemporary cohort undergoing sacral neuromodulation using optimized lead placement technique.采用优化的导丝放置技术的当代队列中骶神经调节的结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38(6):1595-1601. doi: 10.1002/nau.24018. Epub 2019 May 1.
4
Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation on urological diseases: a multicentric research project.骶神经调节治疗泌尿系统疾病的疗效:一项多中心研究项目。
Urologia. 2012 Apr-Jun;79(2):90-6. doi: 10.5301/RU.2012.9278.
5
Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in Latin America: initial results of a multicenter study.骶神经调节治疗拉丁美洲大便失禁:一项多中心研究的初步结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Jun;23(6):545-550. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02004-y. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.长期经皮 SNM 测试不会引起与感染相关的解释。
BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):485-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11263.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
7
Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Sacral Nerve Modulation Therapy.接受骶神经调节治疗患者手术部位感染的危险因素
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):198-204. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000183.
8
First-in-human implantation of a mid-field powered neurostimulator at the sacral nerve: Results from an acute study.首次在人体骶神经植入中场功率神经刺激器:一项急性研究结果。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Aug;38(6):1669-1675. doi: 10.1002/nau.24035. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Evaluation of Sacral Nerve Stimulation Device Revision and Explantation in a Single Center, Multidisciplinary Study.单中心多学科研究评估骶神经刺激器的修订和取出。
Neuromodulation. 2020 Dec;23(8):1201-1206. doi: 10.1111/ner.13050. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
Sacral Neuromodulation: Determining Predictors of Success.骶神经调节:确定成功的预测因素。
Urology. 2021 Jul;153:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.023. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of Perioperative Risk Factors for Early Sacral Nerve Stimulator Explantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.早期骶神经刺激器取出术围手术期危险因素的识别:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 29;14(7):2363. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072363.
2
Can we improve techniques and patients' selection for nerve stimulation suitable for lower urinary tract dysfunctions? ICI-RS 2023.我们能否改进适合下尿路功能障碍的神经刺激技术和患者选择?ICI-RS 2023.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2024 Aug;43(6):1420-1430. doi: 10.1002/nau.25346. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
3
Assessing the effectiveness of antimicrobial pouch use for infection prevention in sacral neuromodulation.
评估抗菌袋在骶神经调节中预防感染的有效性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2513-2517. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05570-w. Epub 2023 May 24.
4
A novel sacral neuromodulation protocol is associated with reduction in removal for device infection.一种新型骶神经调节方案与因设备感染而移除的情况减少有关。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Oct;34(10):2421-2428. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05543-z. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Pyriformis muscle hematoma after percutaneous nerve sacral neuromodulation trial.经皮骶神经调节试验后梨状肌血肿
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2911-2912. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05193-7. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Evaluation of progression from first to second stage sacral neuromodulation and unplanned device removal.评估从第一阶段到第二阶段骶神经调节的进展以及非计划的设备移除情况。
Turk J Urol. 2021 Jan;47(1):58-65. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20288. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Is there a role for sacral neuromodulation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction?骶神经调节在治疗神经源性下尿路功能障碍患者中的作用如何?
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Nov-Dec;46(6):891-901. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.10.
8
[Sacral neuromodulation in under- and overactive detrusor-quo vadis? : Principles and developments].[骶神经调节治疗逼尿肌功能低下与亢进:何去何从?原理与进展]
Urologe A. 2019 Jun;58(6):634-639. doi: 10.1007/s00120-019-0949-7.