CHU Lille, Unité Fonctionnelle de Toxicologie, F-59000 Lille, France; University of Lille, EA 4483 - IMPECS - IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine, F-59000 Lille, France.
Federal Public Service Justice, National Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology, Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jul;57:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) is a worldwide problem with potentially major judiciary and life-threatening consequences. Up to now, only classical drugs of abuse (DOA) are tested for DUID detection. A challenging issue for drafting up-dated international drug policies is to take into account the recent and expanding new psychoactive substances (NPS) market. NPS consist in various narcotic or psychotropic drugs, most of them having a "legal" status, that replicate chemical structures and/or pharmacological effects of classical DOA. Although it is obvious that NPS can lead to impaired driving, the prevalence of NPS use in a DUID context is unknown since the applied roadside screening tests are not yet adapted for these compounds.
Between January and December 2016, a total of 391 oral fluid specimens were obtained from used roadside immunochemical test devices for DOA (Drugwipe-5S device). These specimens were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry and high resolution mass spectrometry.
NPS (mainly cathinone derivatives) were detected in 33 out of the 391 oral fluid samples. This NPS positivity rate of 8.4% in oral fluid of drivers who were submitted to a roadside drug testing in 2016 in France and in Belgium is comparable to the available blood data (NPS positivity rate of 7%) observed in 2015 in similar populations.
Our results demonstrate the reality of driving after NPS use in French and Belgian drivers who were submitted to a roadside DOA test. As there is a lack of on-site detection methods to screen for NPS, the detection of NPS in a rapid and cost-effective DUID detection strategy is currently impossible. The expanding use of NPS, notably by drivers as reported here, and the inability of currently used drug detection tests, should be urgently addressed by road safety and law enforcement authorities.
药物影响下驾驶(DUID)是一个全球性的问题,可能会产生严重的司法和危及生命的后果。到目前为止,只有滥用的经典药物(DOA)被用于检测 DUID。起草最新的国际毒品政策的一个具有挑战性的问题是,要考虑到最近和不断扩大的新精神活性物质(NPS)市场。NPS 由各种麻醉或精神药物组成,其中大多数具有“合法”地位,它们复制了经典 DOA 的化学结构和/或药理学效应。尽管很明显 NPS 会导致驾驶能力受损,但由于目前的路边筛选测试尚未适应这些化合物,因此在 DUID 背景下 NPS 使用的流行率尚不清楚。
2016 年 1 月至 12 月期间,共从用于 DOA(Drugwipe-5S 设备)的路边免疫化学测试设备中获得了 391 份口服液样本。这些样本使用液相色谱串联质谱法和高分辨率质谱法进行分析。
在 2016 年在法国和比利时进行的路边药物检测中,391 份口服液样本中有 33 份检测到 NPS(主要是卡他酮衍生物)。2015 年在类似人群中观察到的血液中 NPS 阳性率(7%)相似,这表明法国和比利时司机的口服液中 NPS 阳性率为 8.4%。
我们的结果表明,在接受路边 DOA 检测的法国和比利时司机中,NPS 使用后确实存在驾驶行为。由于目前还没有现场检测方法来筛选 NPS,因此在快速且具有成本效益的 DUID 检测策略中检测 NPS 目前是不可能的。正如这里所报道的,新精神活性物质的使用不断扩大,以及目前使用的毒品检测测试的能力不足,应引起道路安全和执法当局的紧急关注。