Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Sep;17(3):e451-e456. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) has a poor prognosis. Current first-line chemotherapy options include FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin), NG (nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine), and GEM (gemcitabine) alone. The optimal second-line regimen is unclear. For patients with disease progression with FOLFIRINOX who have a good performance status, NG might be a reasonable second-line option.
Patients in whom APC was diagnosed from 2012 to 2016 who underwent chemotherapy at CancerCare Manitoba were identified from the Manitoba Cancer Registry. Pharmacy records were used to identified those patients who had received first-line FOLFIRINOX, followed by second-line NG, GEM alone, or best supportive care. A retrospective analysis was performed to identify the patient and treatment characteristics, toxicity, radiologic response, and survival. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised, scores were analyzed to assess symptom control.
A total of 146 patients had received first-line FOLFIRINOX. Of those with disease progression who were offered second-line therapy, 30 received NG, 8 GEM alone, and 22 best supportive care. NG was more toxic than GEM alone; however, the dose intensity was similar between the 2 groups. The median progression-free survival was 3.61 months in the NG group and 2.51 months in the GEM-alone group. The median overall survival was 5.69 months in the NG group and 3.82 months in the GEM-alone group. No significant differences were found in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, revised, scores when stratified by the treatment received.
For select patients with APC in whom first-line FOLFIRINOX fails, a role might exist for second-line NG. In our institution, second-line NG was associated with improvement in survival compared with second-line GEM alone, with a manageable toxicity profile.
晚期胰腺癌(APC)预后较差。目前的一线化疗选择包括 FOLFIRINOX(5-氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康、奥沙利铂)、NG(白蛋白结合型紫杉醇、吉西他滨)和 GEM(吉西他滨)单药治疗。最佳二线治疗方案尚不清楚。对于 FOLFIRINOX 治疗后疾病进展且体能状态良好的患者,NG 可能是一种合理的二线选择。
从马尼托巴癌症登记处确定了 2012 年至 2016 年间在马尼托巴癌症中心接受化疗的 APC 患者。使用药房记录确定了接受一线 FOLFIRINOX 治疗后接受二线 NG、GEM 单药或最佳支持治疗的患者。进行了回顾性分析以确定患者和治疗特征、毒性、影像学反应和生存情况。分析了改良后的埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS-R)评分以评估症状控制情况。
共 146 例患者接受了一线 FOLFIRINOX 治疗。在接受二线治疗的疾病进展患者中,30 例接受了 NG,8 例接受了 GEM 单药治疗,22 例接受了最佳支持治疗。NG 比 GEM 单药更具毒性,但两组的剂量强度相似。NG 组的无进展生存期中位数为 3.61 个月,GEM 单药组为 2.51 个月。NG 组的总生存期中位数为 5.69 个月,GEM 单药组为 3.82 个月。根据接受的治疗分层,ESAS-R 评分无显著差异。
对于一线 FOLFIRINOX 治疗失败的特定 APC 患者,二线 NG 可能有一定作用。在我们的机构中,与二线 GEM 单药治疗相比,二线 NG 治疗与生存改善相关,且毒性谱可管理。