Suppr超能文献

一线 FOLFIRINOX 方案与吉西他滨联合 nab-紫杉醇化疗治疗局限性胰腺导管腺癌的反应和生存情况。

Response and Survival Associated With First-line FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine and nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy for Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

出版信息

JAMA Surg. 2020 Sep 1;155(9):832-839. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2286.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine plus nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel (GA) are first-line chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic cancer. Their relative efficacy in the setting of localized disease is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate radiographic and serologic measures of responses associated with first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or GA, and to determine the association between these drug regimens, putative measures of response, and survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This case series assessed 485 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having previously untreated localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, and who received at least 3 cycles of first-line chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX or GA. The median (range) follow-up duration was 33 (2-28) months.

EXPOSURES

Administration of FOLFIRINOX (285 patients [59%]) or GA (200 patients [41%]) as first-line chemotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Resection rate, radiographic metrics (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST], version 1.1, and change in tumor volume or anatomic staging), a serologic metric (serum cancer antigen 19-9 level), and overall survival after administration of first-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

In total, 485 patients (266 [55%] male) were included in the analysis. Patients treated with FOLFIRINOX were generally younger (median [range] age at diagnosis: 61 [30-81] vs 71 [36-89] years; P = .001) and had better performance status as indicated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (range 0-4, with lower numbers representing better performance) score of 2 or lower (274 patients [96%] vs 165 patients [82%] P = .001) but more invasive tumors than patients who received GA (91 [32%] vs 90 [45%] resectable tumors; P = .01). After propensity score matching to control for these biases, many objective serologic and radiographic metrics of response associated with administration of FOLFIRINOX or GA-including low rates of local tumor downstaging-did not differ. However, RECIST partial response was more common among patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (27 of 140 patients [19%]) than with GA (8 of 140 patients [6%]; P = .001). Moreover, (chemo)radiation (50% vs 34%; P = .001) was more commonly administered to and pancreatectomy (27% vs 16%; P = .01) was subsequently performed more frequently for patients initially treated with FOLFIRINOX. The overall survival duration of patients treated with either regimen was similar (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.97-2.26; P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort of patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received FOLFIRINOX or GA as their first line of therapy, FOLFIRINOX was associated with higher rates of RECIST partial response and subsequent pancreatectomy than GA, but the overall survival associated with these regimens was similar.

摘要

重要性

氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、伊立替康和奥沙利铂(FOLFIRINOX)以及吉西他滨联合纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(nab)-紫杉醇(GA)是胰腺癌的一线化疗方案。它们在局部疾病中的相对疗效尚不清楚。

目的

评估 FOLFIRINOX 或 GA 一线化疗与放射学和血清学反应指标的相关性,并确定这些药物方案、潜在反应指标与生存之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:本病例系列评估了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间在德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心被诊断为未经治疗的局部胰腺导管腺癌的 485 例连续患者,这些患者接受了至少 3 个周期的 FOLFIRINOX 或 GA 一线化疗。中位(范围)随访时间为 33(2-28)个月。

暴露

接受 FOLFIRINOX(285 例[59%])或 GA(200 例[41%])作为一线化疗。

主要结果和测量

切除率、放射学指标(实体瘤反应评估标准[RECIST],版本 1.1,肿瘤体积或解剖分期变化)、血清学指标(血清癌抗原 19-9 水平)以及一线化疗后总体生存。

结果

共有 485 例患者(266[55%]为男性)纳入分析。接受 FOLFIRINOX 治疗的患者通常更年轻(中位[范围]诊断年龄:61[30-81]岁 vs 71[36-89]岁;P=0.001),表现状态更好,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 量表评分较低(范围为 0-4,分数越低表示表现越好),得分为 2 或更低(274 例[96%] vs 165 例[82%];P=0.001),但肿瘤侵袭性更高与接受 GA 治疗的患者相比(91[32%] vs 90[45%]可切除肿瘤;P=0.01)。在进行倾向评分匹配以控制这些偏倚后,与接受 FOLFIRINOX 或 GA 治疗相关的许多客观血清学和放射学反应指标并未显示差异,包括局部肿瘤降期率低。然而,与 GA 相比(27 例[19%]),接受 FOLFIRINOX 治疗的患者更常见 RECIST 部分缓解(8 例[6%];P=0.001)。此外,(化疗)放疗(50% vs 34%;P=0.001)更常应用于 FOLFIRINOX 初始治疗的患者,随后行胰腺切除术(27% vs 16%;P=0.01)也更频繁。两种方案治疗的患者的总体生存时间相似(风险比,1.48;95%CI,0.97-2.26;P=0.07)。

结论和相关性

在接受 FOLFIRINOX 或 GA 一线治疗的局部胰腺腺癌患者队列中,FOLFIRINOX 与 GA 相比,RECIST 部分缓解率和随后行胰腺切除术的比例更高,但两种方案的总体生存情况相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
and its flavonoids in the treatment of digestive system tumors.及其黄酮类化合物在消化系统肿瘤治疗中的应用。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 25;15:1483785. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1483785. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

7
Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update.转移性胰腺癌:ASCO 临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2545-2556. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9636. Epub 2018 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验