Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
BJU Int. 2018 Oct;122(4):627-632. doi: 10.1111/bju.14242. Epub 2018 May 4.
To characterise the outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) pre-treated patients found to be lymph node (LN)-positive at the time of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (RC/PLND) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB).
Of 1484 patients treated with RC/PLND for UCB from 2000 to 2010, we analysed 198 patients with clinically non-metastatic (cN0M0) muscle-invasive UCB who were found to be LN-positive at RC/PLND. As patients not receiving perioperative chemotherapy were significantly older and comorbid, we compared LN-positive patients previously treated with NAC (32 patients) to LN-positive patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC, 49 patients) using Cox proportional hazards models. A sensitivity analysis was designed to account for the additional time to RC in NAC patients.
The 3-year recurrence-free survival estimate for LN-positive NAC patients was 26%, compared with 60% for LN-positive AC patients. LN-positive patients treated with NAC had significantly higher risks of disease recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in univariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR] 2.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-5.19, P = 0.001 and HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.34-4.65, P = 0.004, respectively) and multivariable analyses adjusting for pathological stage and LN density (HR 3.11, 95% CI 1.59-6.07, P = 0.001 and HR 3.05, 95% CI 1.46-6.35, P = 0.003, respectively). Sensitivity analyses similarly demonstrated worse outcomes for NAC pre-treated LN-positive patients.
LN-positive patients previously treated with NAC have a poor prognosis, significantly worse than LN-positive patients subsequently treated with AC, and should be considered for protocols using sandwich chemotherapy approaches or novel agents. These results should be considered in the interpretation of and stratification for clinical trials.
描述在根治性膀胱切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(RC/PLND)时发现新辅助化疗(NAC)预处理的膀胱癌患者的淋巴结(LN)阳性患者的结局。
在 2000 年至 2010 年期间,对 1484 例接受 RC/PLND 治疗的膀胱癌患者进行分析,我们分析了 198 例临床非转移性(cN0M0)肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者,在 RC/PLND 时发现 LN 阳性。由于未接受围手术期化疗的患者年龄明显较大且合并症较多,我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型比较了先前接受 NAC 治疗的 LN 阳性患者(32 例)与接受辅助化疗(AC,49 例)的 LN 阳性患者。设计了敏感性分析以考虑 NAC 患者 RC 的额外时间。
LN 阳性 NAC 患者的 3 年无复发生存估计为 26%,而 LN 阳性 AC 患者为 60%。单因素分析中,LN 阳性接受 NAC 治疗的患者疾病复发和癌症特异性死亡的风险显著增加(风险比 [HR] 2.86,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.58-5.19,P = 0.001 和 HR 2.50,95%CI 1.34-4.65,P = 0.004),多变量分析调整病理分期和 LN 密度后(HR 3.11,95%CI 1.59-6.07,P = 0.001 和 HR 3.05,95%CI 1.46-6.35,P = 0.003)。敏感性分析同样表明,NAC 预处理的 LN 阳性患者预后较差。
先前接受 NAC 治疗的 LN 阳性患者预后较差,明显差于随后接受 AC 治疗的 LN 阳性患者,应考虑使用夹心化疗方法或新型药物的方案。这些结果应在临床试验的解释和分层中加以考虑。