2 Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil.
3 Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Escola de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil.
Benef Microbes. 2018 Apr 25;9(3):477-486. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0082. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
The use of probiotics to prevent or treat mucosal inflammation has been studied; however, the combined effect of probiotics and prebiotics is unclear. The aim of this study was to test whether oral administration of a synbiotic (Simbioflora®) preparation containing Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium lactis plus fructooligosaccharide could help control mucosal inflammation in experimental mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Male BALB/c mice were randomly divided into six groups: control (CTL), control + prebiotic (CTL+P), control + synbiotic (CTL+S), mucositis (MUC), mucositis + prebiotic (MUC+P), and mucositis + synbiotic (MUC+S). Mice from the CTL+S, MUC+S, CTL+P, and MUC+P groups received synbiotic or prebiotic daily by oral gavage for 13 days. Mice in the CTL and MUC groups received the same volume of saline. On day 11, mice in the MUC, MUC+P, and MUC+S groups received an intraperitoneal injection of 300 mg/kg 5-FU to induce mucositis. After 72 h, all mice were euthanised. Intestinal permeability, intestinal histology, and biochemical parameters were analysed. Group MUC showed a greater weight loss and increased intestinal permeability (0.020 counts per min [cpm]/g) compared to the CTL group (0.01 cpm/g) P<0.05. Both treatments attenuated weight loss compared to the MUC group. Nonetheless, the synbiotic caused a greater reduction in intestinal permeability (0.012 cpm/g) compared to the MUC (0.020 cpm/g) and MUC+P (0.016 cpm/g) groups P<0.05. Mice in groups MUC+P and MUC+S displayed significant recovery of lesions and maintenance of the mucus layer. There were no differences in the short-chain fatty acid concentrations in the faeces between the MUC and CTL groups (P>0.05). Increased acetate and propionate concentrations were evidenced in the faeces of the MUC+P and MUC+S groups. Only the synbiotic treatment increased the butyrate concentration (P<0.05). The results indicate that administration of synbiotic can decrease mucosal damage caused by mucositis.
本研究旨在测试口服含有副干酪乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌以及低聚果糖的共生元(Simbioflora®)制剂是否有助于控制 5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)诱导的实验性黏膜炎中的黏膜炎症。雄性 BALB/c 小鼠随机分为 6 组:对照组(CTL)、对照组+益生元(CTL+P)、对照组+共生元(CTL+S)、黏膜炎组(MUC)、黏膜炎+益生元组(MUC+P)和黏膜炎+共生元组(MUC+S)。CTL+S、MUC+S、CTL+P 和 MUC+P 组的小鼠通过口服灌胃每天接受共生元或益生元 13 天。CTL 和 MUC 组的小鼠接受相同体积的生理盐水。在第 11 天,MUC、MUC+P 和 MUC+S 组的小鼠接受 300 mg/kg 5-FU 的腹腔注射以诱导黏膜炎。72 小时后,所有小鼠均安乐死。分析肠道通透性、肠道组织学和生化参数。与 CTL 组(0.01 cpm/g)相比,MUC 组显示出更大的体重减轻和更高的肠道通透性(0.020 计数/分钟 [cpm]/g)P<0.05。与 MUC 组相比,两种治疗均减轻了体重减轻。然而,与 MUC(0.020 cpm/g)和 MUC+P(0.016 cpm/g)组相比,共生元治疗导致肠道通透性降低(0.012 cpm/g)更大 P<0.05。MUC+P 和 MUC+S 组的小鼠显示出病变的显著恢复和黏液层的维持。MUC 和 CTL 组粪便中的短链脂肪酸浓度没有差异(P>0.05)。MUC+P 和 MUC+S 组粪便中乙酸和丙酸浓度增加。只有共生元治疗增加了丁酸浓度(P<0.05)。结果表明,共生元的给药可以减少黏膜炎引起的黏膜损伤。