Bove F, Di Lazzaro G, Mulas D, Cocciolillo F, Di Giuda D, Bentivoglio A R
Funct Neurol. 2018 Jan/Mar;33(1):45-49. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2018.33.1.045.
Accelerometry is a reliable tool for gauging the occurrence, amplitude and frequency of tremor. However, there is no consensus on criteria for accelerometric diagnosis of tremor syndromes. We enrolled 20 patients with essential tremor (ET), 20 with dystonic tremor (DT), and 20 with classic parkinsonian tremor (PD-T), all meeting accepted clinical criteria. All the patients underwent dopamine transporter imaging (by means of single-photon emission computed tomography) and triaxial accelerometric tremor analysis. The latter revealed groupwise differences in tremor frequency, peak dispersion, spectral coherence, unilaterality and resting vs action tremor amplitude. From the above, five diagnostic criteria were extrapolated for each condition. Receiver operating characteristic curves, depicting criteriabased scoring of each tremor type, showed negligible declines in specificity for scores ≥4 in patients with ET or DT and scores ≥3 in patients with PD-T, thus providing a simple scoring method (accelerometrically derived) for differential diagnosis of the principal tremor syndromes.
加速度测量法是一种用于评估震颤的发生、幅度和频率的可靠工具。然而,对于震颤综合征的加速度测量诊断标准尚无共识。我们纳入了20例特发性震颤(ET)患者、20例肌张力障碍性震颤(DT)患者和20例典型帕金森病震颤(PD-T)患者,所有患者均符合公认的临床标准。所有患者均接受了多巴胺转运体成像(通过单光子发射计算机断层扫描)和三轴加速度测量震颤分析。后者揭示了震颤频率、峰值离散度、频谱相干性、单侧性以及静息与动作震颤幅度的组间差异。据此,针对每种情况推断出了五条诊断标准。描绘每种震颤类型基于标准评分的受试者工作特征曲线显示,ET或DT患者评分≥4以及PD-T患者评分≥3时,特异性下降可忽略不计,从而为主要震颤综合征的鉴别诊断提供了一种简单的(基于加速度测量得出的)评分方法。