Suppr超能文献

关于生物分析方法一般变更的全面和部分验证的基于风险的科学方法提案。

Proposal for risk-based scientific approach on full and partial validation for general changes in bioanalytical method.

作者信息

Mochizuki Ayumi, Ieki Katsunori, Kamimori Hiroshi, Nagao Akemi, Nakai Keiko, Nakayama Akira, Nanba Eitaro

机构信息

Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Clinical Management, Headquarters of Clinical Development, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 3-2-27 Otedori, Chuo-ku, Osaka 540-0021, Japan.

Pharmacokinetics & Bioanalysis Center, Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Ltd., 16-1 Minamiakasaka, Kainan, Wakayama 642-0017, Japan.

出版信息

Bioanalysis. 2018 Apr 1;10(8):577-586. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0226. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

Abstract

The guidance and several guidelines on bioanalytical method validation, which were issued by the US FDA, EMA and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, list the 'full' validation parameters; however, none of these provide any details for 'partial' validation. Japan Bioanalysis Forum approved a total of three annual discussion groups from 2012 to 2014. In the discussion groups, members from pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations discussed the details of partial validation from a risk assessment viewpoint based on surveys focusing on bioanalysis of small molecules using LC-MS/MS in Japan. This manuscript presents perspectives and recommendations for most conceivable changes that can be made to full and partial validations by members of the discussion groups based on their experiences and discussions at the Japan Bioanalysis Forum Symposium.

摘要

美国食品药品监督管理局(US FDA)、欧洲药品管理局(EMA)以及日本厚生劳动省发布的指南和多项生物分析方法验证指南列出了“全面”验证参数;然而,这些指南均未提供“部分”验证的任何详细信息。日本生物分析论坛在2012年至2014年期间共批准了三个年度讨论小组。在这些讨论小组中,来自制药公司和合同研究组织的成员基于对日本使用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)进行小分子生物分析的调查,从风险评估的角度讨论了部分验证的细节。本手稿基于讨论小组成员在日本生物分析论坛研讨会上的经验和讨论,提出了对全面验证和部分验证最可能做出的改变的观点和建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验