Franken Margreet G, Leeneman Brenda, Jochems Anouk, Schouwenburg Maartje G, Aarts Maureen J B, van Akkooi Alexander C J, van den Berkmortel Franchette W P J, van den Eertwegh Alfonsus J M, de Groot Jan Willem B, van der Hoeven Koos J M, Hospers Geke A P, Kapiteijn Ellen, Koornstra Rutger, Kruit Wim H J, Louwman Marieke W J, Piersma Djura, van Rijn Rozemarijn S, Suijkerbuijk Karijn P M, Ten Tije Albert J, Vreugdenhil Gerard, Wouters Michel W J M, van Zeijl Michiel, Haanen John B A G, Uyl-de Groot Carin A
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment.
Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University.
Anticancer Drugs. 2018 Jul;29(6):579-588. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000628.
There is limited evidence on the costs associated with ipilimumab. We investigated healthcare costs of all Dutch patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma who were treated with ipilimumab. Data were retrieved from the nation-wide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Costs were determined by applying unit costs to individual patient resource use. A total of 807 patients who were diagnosed between July 2012 and July 2015 received ipilimumab in Dutch practice. The mean (median) episode duration was 6.27 (4.61) months (computed from the start of ipilimumab until the start of a next treatment, death, or the last date of follow-up). The average total healthcare costs amounted to &OV0556;81 484, but varied widely (range: &OV0556;18 131-&OV0556;160 002). Ipilimumab was by far the most important cost driver (&OV0556;73 739). Other costs were related to hospital admissions (&OV0556;3323), hospital visits (&OV0556;1791), diagnostics and imaging (&OV0556;1505), radiotherapy (&OV0556;828), and surgery (&OV0556;297). Monthly costs for resource use other than ipilimumab were &OV0556;1997 (SD: &OV0556;2629). Treatment-naive patients (n=344) had higher total costs compared with previously-treated patients (n=463; &OV0556;85 081 vs. &OV0556;78 811). Although patients with colitis (n=106) had higher costs for resource use other than ipilimumab (&OV0556;11 426) compared with patients with other types of immune-related adverse events (n=90; &OV0556;9850) and patients with no immune-related adverse event (n=611; &OV0556;6796), they had lower total costs (&OV0556;76 075 vs. &OV0556;87 882 and &OV0556;81 480, respectively). In conclusion, this nation-wide study provides valuable insights into the healthcare costs of advanced cutaneous melanoma patients who were treated with ipilimumab in clinical practice. Most of the costs were attributable to ipilimumab, but the costs and its distribution varied considerably across subgroups.
关于伊匹单抗相关成本的证据有限。我们调查了所有接受伊匹单抗治疗的荷兰晚期皮肤黑色素瘤患者的医疗费用。数据取自荷兰全国黑色素瘤治疗登记处。通过将单位成本应用于个体患者的资源使用情况来确定成本。在荷兰的实际治疗中,共有807名在2012年7月至2015年7月期间被诊断的患者接受了伊匹单抗治疗。平均(中位数)病程为6.27(4.61)个月(从开始使用伊匹单抗直至开始下一次治疗、死亡或最后随访日期计算)。平均总医疗费用达81484欧元,但差异很大(范围:18131欧元 - 160002欧元)。伊匹单抗是迄今为止最重要的成本驱动因素(73739欧元)。其他成本与住院(3323欧元)、门诊就诊(1791欧元)、诊断和影像学检查(1505欧元)、放疗(828欧元)及手术(297欧元)有关。除伊匹单抗外的资源使用月度成本为1997欧元(标准差:2629欧元)。初治患者(n = 344)的总成本高于既往接受过治疗的患者(n = 463;85081欧元对78811欧元)。尽管与患有其他类型免疫相关不良事件的患者(n = 90;9850欧元)和无免疫相关不良事件的患者(n = 611;6796欧元)相比,患有结肠炎的患者(n = 106)除伊匹单抗外的资源使用成本更高(11426欧元),但其总成本更低(分别为76075欧元对87882欧元和81480欧元)。总之,这项全国性研究为临床实践中接受伊匹单抗治疗的晚期皮肤黑色素瘤患者的医疗费用提供了有价值的见解。大部分成本归因于伊匹单抗,但成本及其分布在不同亚组间差异很大。