Gagnier Joel J, Shen Ying, Huang Hsiaomin
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
JBJS Rev. 2018 Apr;6(4):e5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00114.
Despite the high costs of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries to patients and society, we are not aware of any systematic reviews that have been performed on patient-reported outcome instruments designed for this patient population. The purpose of the present review is to identify currently available patient-reported outcome questionnaires for patients with ACL injuries, to appraise and assess the methodological quality and psychometric evidence of the evaluations of identified instruments, and to summarize the overall evidence for each included questionnaire.
A computerized literature search was performed to identify articles appropriate for inclusion in this systematic review. Search terms were related to outcome instruments, ACL injuries, and psychometric properties. Two independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles for inclusion. The methodological quality of instrument evaluation was assessed with use of the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Psychometric properties were assessed with use of the quality criteria established by Terwee et al. The 2 assessments were synthesized to obtain an overall rating of the psychometric evidence for each questionnaire.
Forty-one studies investigating 24 instruments were included. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were the most frequently assessed instruments. The ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale had 6 properties with positive evidence and was the highest-quality instrument overall.
Many of the included studies had low COSMIN ratings. The ACL-RSI is a reliable and valid scale to measure outcomes for patients with ACL injuries. Further assessments with improved methodological quality are needed to determine the psychometric properties of other instruments.
尽管前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤给患者和社会带来高昂代价,但我们并未发现针对该患者群体设计的患者报告结局工具的任何系统评价。本综述的目的是识别目前可用于ACL损伤患者的患者报告结局问卷,评估所识别工具评价的方法学质量和心理测量学证据,并总结各纳入问卷的总体证据。
进行计算机文献检索以识别适合纳入本系统评价的文章。检索词与结局工具、ACL损伤和心理测量学特性相关。两名独立评审员评估文章纳入的适宜性。使用基于共识的健康状况测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估工具评价的方法学质量。使用Terwee等人确立的质量标准评估心理测量学特性。综合这两项评估以获得每份问卷心理测量学证据的总体评分。
纳入了41项研究,涉及24种工具。国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)表格和膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)是评估最频繁的工具。ACL损伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)量表有6项具有阳性证据的特性,是总体质量最高的工具。
许多纳入研究的COSMIN评分较低。ACL-RSI是一种可靠且有效的量表,用于测量ACL损伤患者的结局。需要进一步进行方法学质量更高的评估,以确定其他工具的心理测量学特性。