Kemeny N, Reichman B, Geller N, Hollander P
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY 10021.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1988 Feb;11(1):66-72. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198802000-00014.
A prospective randomized trial using the group sequential statistical method with frequent planned interim analyses was initiated in patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma comparing methotrexate and 5 fluorouracil (MTX-FU) to methyl CCNU, vincristine, FU, and streptozotocin (MOF-Strep). As a requirement of the group sequential design, a p value of 0.0125 was necessary to stop the trial at the first analysis. The first analysis was done after 17 patients were entered in each study arm and revealed six partial responses to MOF-Strep (35%) and one partial response to MTX-FU (6%) (p = 0.017). As a result, patient accrual continued. Problems encountered with the implementation of the group sequential methodology and the importance of stratification for prognostic variables are discussed.
一项前瞻性随机试验采用成组序贯统计方法并进行频繁的计划中期分析,纳入转移性结直肠癌患者,比较甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶(MTX-FU)与甲基环己亚硝脲、长春新碱、氟尿嘧啶和链脲佐菌素(MOF-Strep)。作为成组序贯设计的要求,首次分析时需要p值为0.0125才能停止试验。每个研究组纳入17例患者后进行了首次分析,结果显示MOF-Strep组有6例部分缓解(35%),MTX-FU组有1例部分缓解(6%)(p = 0.017)。因此,继续纳入患者。文中讨论了成组序贯方法实施过程中遇到的问题以及对预后变量进行分层的重要性。