Department of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (West Campus), Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Ministry of Education, No.41 Da Mu Cang, Western District, Beijing, 100032, People's Republic of China.
Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Beijing, 100086, China.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Apr 10;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1567-2.
The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of remission induction in patients with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) in our cohort, and to investigate the characteristics, prognosis, and risk factors in the patients failed of remission induction.
We prospectively enrolled 215 newly diagnosed patients with IgG4-RD, who were initially treated with glucocorticoid (GC) alone or in combination with immunosuppressive agents (IM), and had at least 6 months of follow up. The therapeutic goals of remission induction were defined as fulfilling each of the following after the 6-month remission induction stage: (1) ≥ 50% decline in the IgG4-RD responder index (RI); (2) GC tapered to maintenance dose; and (3) no relapse during GC tapering. The patients not achieving the therapeutic goals were considered to have failed of remission induction.
There were 26 patients in our cohort who failed of remission induction, including 16 (20.8%) on GC monotherapy, and 10 (7.2%) on combination therapy comprising GC and IM. The lacrimal gland and lung were most common sites of remission induction failure. Among the patients who relapsed during remission induction stage, 52.9% had secondary relapse during follow-up. Eosinophilia, higher baseline RI, more than five organs involved and dacryoadenitis were risk factors for remission induction failure with GC monotherapy, and the incidence of remission induction failure was 71.4% in the patients with more than three risk factors. After 6-month treatment, the patients who failed of remission induction had significantly higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and IgG4.
In our cohort, 20.8% of patients failed of remission induction with GC monotherapy, while 7.2% of patients failed of remission induction with combination therapy comprising GC and IM.
本研究旨在评估 IgG4 相关疾病(IgG4-RD)患者在本队列中的缓解诱导治疗结局,并探讨缓解诱导失败患者的特征、预后和危险因素。
我们前瞻性纳入 215 例新诊断的 IgG4-RD 患者,这些患者最初接受糖皮质激素(GC)单药或联合免疫抑制剂(IM)治疗,且至少随访 6 个月。缓解诱导的治疗目标定义为在 6 个月的缓解诱导阶段后满足以下所有标准:(1)IgG4-RD 应答指数(RI)至少下降 50%;(2)GC 减至维持剂量;(3)GC 减量过程中无复发。未达到治疗目标的患者被认为缓解诱导失败。
在我们的队列中,有 26 例患者缓解诱导失败,其中 16 例(20.8%)接受 GC 单药治疗,10 例(7.2%)接受 GC 联合 IM 治疗。缓解诱导失败最常见的部位是泪腺和肺。在缓解诱导阶段复发的患者中,52.9%在随访期间再次复发。嗜酸性粒细胞增多、较高的基线 RI、受累器官超过 5 个和涎腺炎是 GC 单药治疗缓解诱导失败的危险因素,有 3 个以上危险因素的患者缓解诱导失败的发生率为 71.4%。治疗 6 个月后,缓解诱导失败的患者红细胞沉降率(ESR)、C 反应蛋白(CRP)和 IgG4 明显更高。
在本队列中,20.8%的 GC 单药治疗患者和 7.2%的 GC 联合 IM 治疗患者缓解诱导失败。