Department of Clinical Research, New York University (NYU) Langone - Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, City University of New York School of Public Health, New York City, New York, USA.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Aug;72(8):746-751. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210437. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
Seatbelt use, alone and in conjunction with an airbag, is associated with lower risk of mortality, blunt abdominal trauma and kidney injury in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs). However, the effect of these protective devices on risk of severe liver injury is not well characterised.
This retrospective cohort study included patient admissions with liver injuries from MVCs from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), collected from 2010 to 2015 in the USA. We examined associations between injury severity and seatbelt use and airbag presence individually and in the presence of additive interaction. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications and discharge disposition.
We analysed 55 543 records from the National Trauma Data Bank. In adjusted analysis, seatbelt use alone was protective against severe (AAST VI or above) hepatic injury (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.84), while airbag presence alone was not (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.8 to 1.12). The joint association of seatbelt use and airbag presence with injury severity was greater than seatbelts alone (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.79), with 13% of the joint lower risk attributable to interaction (95% CI 3% to 24%). The adjusted mortality risk of those without protective devices (10.3%, n=2297) was nearly double that of patients who used a seatbelt in conjunction with a present airbag (5.3%, n=699, p<0.001).
Seatbelts are associated with lower liver injury severity and are more protective with airbags present, while airbags without seatbelt use were not protective against severe injury among patients with liver injury.
安全带的使用,无论是单独使用还是与安全气囊一起使用,都与机动车事故(MVC)中死亡率、钝性腹部创伤和肾损伤的风险降低相关。然而,这些保护装置对严重肝损伤风险的影响尚未得到很好的描述。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)中 2010 年至 2015 年期间 MVC 导致的肝损伤患者的住院记录。我们分别检查了安全带使用和安全气囊存在与损伤严重程度的关联,以及在存在附加交互作用的情况下的关联。次要结局是死亡率、并发症和出院去向。
我们分析了来自国家创伤数据库的 55543 份记录。在调整后的分析中,安全带单独使用可预防严重(AAST VI 或以上)肝损伤(风险比(RR)0.79,95%CI 0.75 至 0.84),而单独使用安全气囊则不能(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.8 至 1.12)。安全带使用和安全气囊存在的联合与损伤严重程度的关联大于单独使用安全带(RR 0.74,95%CI 0.70 至 0.79),交互作用导致的联合风险降低了 13%(95%CI 3%至 24%)。没有使用保护装置的患者(10.3%,n=2297)的调整死亡率风险几乎是使用安全带和安全气囊的患者(5.3%,n=699,p<0.001)的两倍。
安全带与较低的肝损伤严重程度相关,与安全气囊同时使用更具保护作用,而没有安全带使用的安全气囊并不能预防肝损伤患者的严重损伤。